![](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/onlysky.media\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/the-fab-five.jpg\")
<\/p>\nThese subjects aren’t going away, because so many people are as gullible as ever — understood as inevitable human nature. This may imply a cap on the potential of the human race, in terms of its ability to engage with reality to ensure its survival against existential threats. Items from OnlySky, BigThink (Lee McIntyre), and Scientific Mindset.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
OnlySky, M.L. Clark, 18 Aug 2023<\/strong>: Meet the Fab Five of misleading information<\/a>, subtitled “On misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, truthiness, and just-so stories”<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Overview:<\/p>\n Error is an inevitable part of information-sharing. But when we disseminate error, whether through misinformation or with ill-intent, we risk damaging our discourse. Here’s what to look out for in false forms, and how to defend against them.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n \\<\/p>\n Big Think, Kevin Dickson interviewing Lee McIntyre, 5 Sep 2023<\/strong>: Disarming disinformation: How to understand and counter the \u201cpost-truth playbook\u201d<\/a>, subtitled “Philosopher Lee McIntyre discusses the dangers of disinformation, how such falsehoods spread, and what we can do about it.”<\/p>\n Key Takeaways The previous piece at OnlySky made some similar points, but there are lots of good passages to quote in this one. McIntyre has a new book out, On Disinformation: How to Fight for Truth and Protect Democracy<\/b><\/a>.<\/p>\n McIntyre:<\/strong> If I had five minutes with a microphone that could reach everyone in the world, that is the distinction I would draw. It\u2019s that important.<\/p>\n Misinformation<\/a> is a mistake or an accident. It\u2019s when somebody says something that isn\u2019t true, and they believe it is, but it just happens to be false. If you show them the evidence, maybe they would see where they were wrong and change their mind.<\/p>\n Disinformation<\/a> is a lie. It is false information that is intentionally false and shared by someone who knows it is false. And they do it with a purpose. They do it to deceive others into thinking the falsehood is true and to distrust anyone who doesn\u2019t believe that falsehood. So, disinformation can lead not only to false beliefs but also to hate for the other side.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n With a long aside about how the cigarette companies staged an aggressive campaign, beginning in the 1950s, to deny the scientific findings that smoking caused lung cancer. Why? Because they wanted to make lots of money. Then how politicians, and people, have always lied, but today there’s amplification of disinformation via websites and Twitter.<\/p>\n You sometimes hear science deniers say, \u201cWhat about this? What about that and this other thing?\u201d By the time you give them the facts, they have already moved on to something else. It takes so much longer to debunk something than it does for a falsehood to spread. It\u2019s their way of slowing down the other side.<\/p>\n It\u2019s a technique that dates back to [Lenin\u2019s] Cheka: the firehose of falsehood. The disinformer doesn\u2019t give one falsehood. He gives 20, even ones that contradict the others. That way, people have to go, \u201cWhoa, I\u2019m going to have to really sit down and think about that.\u201d Meanwhile, he\u2019s still out spreading falsehoods and evading accountability.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n This is the familiar Gish Gallop. (Mentioned several times<\/a> recently.)<\/p>\n Key point:<\/p>\n Kevin:<\/strong> That connects to another quality of disinformation you mention in your book: When people reach their conclusions without facts, facts won\u2019t change their mind. It\u2019s more about community and values.<\/p>\n McIntyre:<\/strong> Yeah. Disbelief can be a strong bond builder between people. You want to be with your tribe, the people who believe what you believe.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n With more about amplifiers and believers, and “bothsidesism.”<\/p>\n McIntyre:<\/strong> The believers are victims. Usually, they\u2019re people who are being taken advantage of. Go back to the cigarette example. The people who believed the tobacco companies were the victims. They were the ones who continued to smoke thinking there was a scientific debate, and they died.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The same can be said for Covid-deniers, of course. A key point, about trust:<\/p>\n People sometimes wonder why they can\u2019t convince somebody who disagrees with them with facts. I think one answer is that it\u2019s not about facts. It\u2019s about trust. If you don\u2019t trust the person who\u2019s sharing the facts, then you aren\u2019t going to believe what they say.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n With a discussion about how the idea that there were microchips in the Covid vaccines was originally a product of a Russian troll farm, and was exposed, but still many people believe it, without knowing it was deliberate disinformation. Some people will believe anything, and the trolls know this.<\/p>\n Final quote:<\/p>\n So, the wrong way to be skeptical is to not believe anything anybody says. The right way to be skeptical is to think, why does that person want me to believe this? Sometimes, the answer will be because it\u2019s true. They are scientists, they\u2019ve studied it, and they\u2019ve got the evidence. But sometimes, they want you to not look very hard.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The familiar example of this kind of skeptical thinking is: Follow the Money.<\/p>\n \\\\<\/p>\n Finally for today, here’s an item linked by one of my Facebook friends (a NASA scientist, so I’ll trust the source even though I’ve never seen it before, and still relevant though being two years old). Do we still need to discuss the motivations of conspiracy theorists? Maybe we do. This is succinct, though I’m pretty sure it makes points I’ve made before.<\/p>\n Scientific Mindset, Antony Javaid with David Hundsness, 4 Dec 2021<\/strong>: Psychologist Lists 4 Reasons Why People Fall For Conspiracy Theories<\/a>: “but it’s ego that actually does the heavy lifting.”<\/p>\n Oddly the post is a set of images from a video. So I’ll type:<\/p>\n One, is when there’s a lack of information, a conspiracy theory fills in that missing gap of knowledge.<\/p>\n Two, is when something causes anxiety, a conspiracy theory helps you predict where that threat is coming from, so it doesn’t feel so random.<\/p>\n Three, is wanting to follow your in-group. So if your political party or whatever believes a conspiracy, then you are more likely to believe it.<\/p>\n And the fourth reason is ego. People believe conspiracy theories believe they are in a special group of independent thinkers who know the truth. They think they have a superior knowledge while the majority of people are just sheep who are foolishly gullible and easily manipulated…<\/p><\/blockquote>\n I’ve long thought the third point here is the key, especially for people living in small towns, where everyone knows each other, and it’s dangerous to think independently, contrary to the conventional wisdom of the neighborhood.<\/p>\n At the same time… truth about reality doesn’t matter to most people.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" These subjects aren’t going away, because so many people are as gullible as ever — understood as inevitable human nature. This may imply a cap on the potential of the human race, in terms of its ability to engage with … Continue reading ![](\"https:\/\/bigthink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/AdobeStock_609777246.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n\u2022 Misinformation is a mistake. Disinformation is a lie told to cover the truth and spread hate. \u2022 Belief in disinformation is often less about facts and more about tribalism and community. \u2022 To counter disinformation, we can\u2019t give into cynicism or helplessness; we must stay engaged through healthy skepticism.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n![](\"https:\/\/scientificmindset.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/enn1.jpg\")
<\/p>\n