“We think and dream and fuss and project entire worlds into existence”

  • A new NYT newsletter called Gravitational Pull;
  • Remembering Roger Williams, an early American advocate of religious liberty;
  • And about early American philosophers Jonathan Williams and Benjamin Franklin;
  • And revisiting Richard Einhorn’s Voices of Light, after 30 years; it’s still beautiful.
– – –

So what is this?

NY Times, The Morning newsletter, Melissa Kirsch, today: Gravitational Pull, subtitled: “We think and dream and fuss and project entire worlds into existence. Meanwhile, the earth’s orbit continues and the sun goes on shining.”

Beginning:

Earlier this week, the earth reached its greatest distance from the sun, a point known as “aphelion.” It seems counterintuitive that Earth reaches aphelion in summer, but it’s the planet’s tilt, not its proximity to the sun, that gives us the season.

At aphelion, we’re about 94.5 million miles from the sun, a distance so vast as to be unfathomable. What we can fathom: our two feet pressing into Earth, taking up just inches of space. We’re here, now, in this room, in this house, in this town, a body and a mind and five senses taking in as much as we can. We’re so small, but so powerful that we can think and dream and fuss and project entire worlds into existence. And then we think those worlds are the entire universe. Meanwhile, the earth’s orbit continues, the sun goes on shining.

And about the upcoming film “The Odyssey.” Musing about the midpoint of the year. So is this a periodic musings about nature and science, mindfulness-style? A companion to The Atlantic item I noticed yesterday? We’ll see.

\\\

OnlySky, Becky Garrison, 10 Jul 2026: On America’s 250th anniversary, let’s remember Roger Williams, subtitled “A pioneer of religious liberty reminds us why secularism is the better way.”

Donald Trump and his Christian nationalist cronies envision a cramped future of religious coercion and enforced uniformity for America. But one of our nation’s founder figures preached a better way, and his lesson still has value for us. If we learn from him, we have the chance to build a future that’s freewheeling, fearless, and gloriously unorthodox.

Warren Throckmorton, author of The Christian Past That Wasn’t: Debunking the Christian Nationalist Myths that Hijack History observes, “During the nation’s 250th anniversary celebration, the current presidential administration seems intent on fostering an ever-closer relationship between Christianity and state. Vice President JD Vance recently declared that ‘Christianity is America’s creed.’ President Trump’s Department of Labor posted to social media a fictitious portrait of George Washington praying in Pennsylvania snow. It regularly depicts images which suggest that worship in America takes place only on Sunday, ignoring members of other faiths who worship on other days of the week. Early in his term Trump told a prayer group, ‘They say separation between church and state, I said, “All right, let’s forget about that for one time.”’”

Roger Williams, the writer’s 12th-great-grandfather, founded Rhode Island. He

proclaimed that “forced religion stinks in one’s nostrils.” That sentiment could easily be applied to this politicized and militarized form of Christianity that’s more reminiscent of the Handmaid’s Tale than anything.

And

The myth of American exceptionalism, the claim that America should set an example for the world as a stronghold of the Protestant Christian faith, is at least as old as the original thirteen colonies. The first governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, John Winthrop, coined the phrase “a city upon a hill” as early as 1630.

In contrast to Winthrop, Williams chafed at the notion of a “Christian nation” because, in his view, those who call themselves Christians should be guided in their convictions by faith and repentance, not by government authority or coercion. He advocated liberty of conscience—the belief that one should be free to worship as they please, without having their beliefs dictated or forced upon them by any governing body. Such views, radical for his era, resulted in him being banished from Massachusetts by Winthrop. Williams fled in the dead of winter to the wilds of Rhode Island, where he crafted the first constitution in the Western world that granted religious freedom even to “heretics” who chose to reside in the new colony.

Rather than a groupthink consensus where everyone follows a particular form of orthodoxy, Williams preferred the cacophony of free thinkers arguing passionately in the public square. He engaged in vigorous theological debates and was tolerant of opposing views, in comparison with other Puritan religious leaders who demanded strict conformity in their faith communities.

How have things turned out?

Even though the Founding Fathers wrote the principle into the First Amendment, they differed on what “freedom of religion” really meant. While a few hewed closer to Williams’ vision, more often it was Winthrop’s style of coercion and authority that dominated the early U.S. political landscape. Even today, conservative religious leaders are still trying to impose their particular brand of religion on the rest of the nation—and the world—with events such as the National Prayer Breakfast, CPAC, America Reads the Bible, Freedom 250, Freedom Con, and Freedom Night in America. Progressive-minded believers counter this narrative with their own version of a City on a Hill by promising, “if we build a better church, they will come.”

Yet the statistics tell a different story, one that accords with neither the religious left nor the religious right. The Public Religion Research Institute reported in 2016 that “one-quarter of Americans claim no formal religious identity,” which makes this group larger than any single religion in the United States. Moreover, the number of those who list their religion as “none” is continuing to rise.

Religion is essentially tribal: it provides a sense of belonging, a shared set of beliefs (the more irrational the better) that guarantee fellow believers can be trusted. Some kind of group function like this is likely to last forever. But one reason religion has faded is that their supernatural claims have been increasingly refuted, or debunked, by all that humanity has learned in the past two millennia. Religions shift to pretend it’s all just allegory. But some believers still believe literally.

\\\

This, too, is about how human culture perpetuates, even progresses.

Big Think, Jonny Thomson, 9 Jul 2026: “Live deliberately”: The origin of America’s first philosophy, subtitled “How a culture of independence gave rise to a philosophy of self-reliance, solitude, and inner authority.”

Key Takeaways

  • We don’t choose our beliefs from scratch: People and societies inherit ideas before they learn to challenge them.
  • Figures like Jonathan Edwards and Benjamin Franklin helped America step out from Europe’s intellectual shadow and begin thinking on its own terms.
  • With transcendentalism, the young nation found its first major philosophy — one that prized self-reliance, solitude, nature, and inner authority over old-world institutions and traditions.

Well, of course. A social species like our grows by learning from the experience of our ancestors. Each person can’t learn about the world from scratch.

As much as we might hate the idea, many of our values are inherited rather than consciously chosen.

But the reason humanity has progressed is because some people do think beyond what they’ve inherited. The article goes on about the first strands of “American philosophy,” with Jonathan Edwards and Benjamin Franklin. The writer compares his situation with theirs.

I feel a great affinity with Edwards and Franklin — a strange thing to hear from someone schooled in the British university system — because I never enrolled in a postgraduate philosophy program. I do not have a PhD. In some European circles, that’s a badge of shame. “Dr. Thomson” would open doors — often centuries-old and bolted with medieval iron — that “Mr. Thomson” cannot. And yet, here I am as the “lead philosopher” of Big Think, writing for a successful and prestigious American company. It doesn’t matter that I don’t have a 50,000-word thesis on late Wittgenstein on my bookshelf. It matters that I can write about philosophy well and get it (mostly) right.

This is for good reason. American culture celebrates the self-taught hustler and the side-door entrant, from the self-made men of the early republic to the college-dropout CEOs of Silicon Valley, and the two dominant figures in 18th-century American philosophy lived, wrote, and excelled outside of formal academia.

\\\

This evening listening to an album I loved 30 years ago, but have been afraid to listen to again. Would it be outdated, somehow trite? My hesitation was partly because this composer, Richard Einhorn, seems never to have done anything substantial since this album. Wikipedia shows he’s done some film scores, from the late ’70s through the ’90s, for minor films I’ve never heard of.

But this piece is still really good. It’s on YouTube, but in the obnoxious format the splits each track into a separate post, with commercials.

Posted in Music, Philosophy, Religion | Leave a comment

Human Limitations and Potential

Rethinking again the categories of posts I do here, while working on a new set of overview pages to supplement or replace my decade-old Provisional Conclusions. I tend to collect links about reality illiteracy (e.g. flat-earthers) and tribalistic morality (conservative yearning to retreat to a simpler past), but also about modernity and secularism, and about reality.

Let’s do a couple three on the last theme. But I only have a few minutes…

Here’s one that explores the idea of scale. A key component of ‘reality illiteracy’ is that humans evolved in an ancient environment where, over hundreds of thousands of years, human nature developed intuitions at local scales. We’re intuitive about distances of a few miles or down to an inch; we’re intuitive about time scales from moments to a generation. But the real world is vastly greater, in all dimensions, as humans have been able to deduce from the evidence of the physical world around us.

Here’s an example. We think of things as deep, or high, without really being aware of relative depth or height.

XKCD, from a couple days ago: Holes

I’ll let it speak for itself. And here’s a large version of the image

\\

And here’s the first in a series of a new column at The Atlantic, apparently.

The Atlantic, Ian Bogost, 7 Jul 2026: The Wonder of Everyday Life, subtitled “Welcome to Ordinary Extraordinary, our new, eight-week newsletter series.”

This doesn’t seem to be about science, but more about being aware of everyday life. Like the pleasure of driving a stick-shift car. The writer published this book. I’ll follow up on later installments.

\\

This one’s more speculative, and I haven’t listened to the entire thing yet.

Facebook video, Star Talk, Neil de Grasse Tyson and guest, Are We Intelligent Enough?

This goes to ideas of humanity’s cognitive limitations, and whether there are ideas about the universe we may never be able to understand. And, for that matter, why so many humans deny knowledge and prefer myths.

Posted in reality, Science | Leave a comment

Religious Presumption and Denial of Reality

  • Dale Partridge wants the white race to again subdue and enslave the Africans;
  • Red Joseph thinks gays are impossible;
  • Recalling Howard Zinn, who told the history conservatives would deny;
  • Will conservative historians 50 years from now erase MAGA, as an embarrassing episode from the 2020s?
– – –

Right Wing Watch, Kyle Mantyla, yesterday: Dale Partridge Calls For The Return Of ‘European Christian Colonization Of African Nations’

For the last several weeks, far-right Christian nationalist pastor Dale Partridge has been preaching on the Curse of Ham, a controversial theological theory long used to justify slavery and racism.

Originating in Genesis 9, the theory posits that black people were perpetually cursed by God to serve and be ruled by white people because Ham, one of the sons of Noah, looked upon his father when he was passed out drunk and naked in his tent.

Partridge claimed that “the African peoples … and some of the people from India” are the modern-day descendants of Ham and that they have been assigned by God to be ruled over and dependent upon whites, Europeans, Asians, Jews, and Arabs, who are allegedly the descendants of Ham’s brothers, Shem and Japheth.

This is why religion poisons everything, in Hitchens’ words. Here Partridge is using it to justify the presumptions of white Europeans to subdue the black and brown races around the world. Don’t they have anything to say about it? Also, the curse of Ham is seeing his father naked? That’s it?

\\\

The main problem with faith is that it teaches you to believe things that are not true. It teaches you a simplified version of reality.

Friendly Atheist, Hemant Mehta, today: Evangelical GOP candidate Rod Joseph: “You cannot be born gay. That’s impossible”, subtitled “The Republican said being gay is a choice, despite campaigning in one of South Florida’s most LGBTQ-friendly districts”

“You cannot be born gay. That’s impossible biologically,” he said.

Joseph said sexuality is a preference, not an inherent orientation. “Sexual preference from the Roman Empire to date, it’s always a preference.”

Joseph, in an interview Tuesday, also said he is concerned that people are somehow indoctrinated or influenced to become LGBTQ. “Most of the people, they’re victims of sexual abuse at the very young age.”

Nonsense, especially the last comment. He’s ignorant. Homosexuality is perfectly possible and happens among hundreds of animal species, as has been well-documented. He’s blinded by faith.

(Of course, there is always this response: if being gay is just a choice, so what? Why do they care? Isn’t being American about freedom, to do whatever one wants without government or religious coercion?)

\\\

A running theme here is that conservatives retell the past to suit their current priorities and values. Perhaps all nations and religions do this. More broadly: even human memory is subject to selective editing, to place the self in better circumstances. (Don’t trust your memories, especially your older ones, especially those that placed you in a good or bad light.)

LA Times, Dave Zirin, yesterday: Howard Zinn spoke to this moment, even decades ago

Howard Zinn, who died in 2010, was the author of A People’s History of the United States, which might be defined as a record of all the history of the US that conservatives want to deny and erase. I have a copy, but have only read a portion. It’s relevant now because of Trump’s ambitions to whitewash history in the Smithsonian Museums. (See Inside Trump’s Ideological Fight With the Smithsonian.)

Not many historians have seen their work referenced on “The Simpsons” and “The Sopranos.” Not many historians have been condemned by name by a president on the White House lawn for the “crime” of researching and writing about this nation’s history. And not many historians have taught countless people that this country’s past looks quite different depending upon the perspective of those doing the telling. This is Howard Zinn, who shaped Americans’ understanding of themselves through seven decades of activism and whose insights should continue to color how we understand the news of the day.

Those doing the telling, precisely. This is both political and psychological.

Zinn is both perhaps the most banned historian in U.S. history and the author of arguably the most enduring U.S. history text, the 46-year-old and still best-selling “A People’s History of the United States.” He had died a decade earlier when President Trump — amid the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic — held Zinn responsible for “left-wing rioting and mayhem” and “propaganda tracts … that try to make students ashamed of their own history.”

At the barest-bones level, detractors attack Zinn for the same reason teachers, students and readers celebrate him: because his work inspires people to think critically, fight back and make their own history. For the authoritarian, the thought of people being inspired in such a manner is chilling. It also contradicts their politically useful belief that history only happens at the behest of “great men.” Those who’ve read Zinn — and some of the generations of historians inspired by him — recognize this to be the greatest lie of all. As he wrote: “The good things that have been done, the reforms … all of that was not done by government edict. … It was all done by citizens’ movements. … What really matters is what are people doing, and what are people saying, what are people demanding.”

The biggest lie is that history is the result of “great men.” That’s a simplistic view of history, and so of course beloved by conservatives. Reality is more complex, as always.

The balance of the article is about how Zinn’s influence is waning. This, I think, is the inescapable cycle of history. Yet which manages to progress. The article ends:

History proves that when there are green shoots pushing out of the concrete, then — to paraphrase Tupac Shakur — those of us who want change need to tend to them, not ignore or even stomp these glints of hope because they aren’t yet what we want them to be.

We need hope and truth-tellers more than ever because this country at 250 is being smothered: suffocating under an avalanche of disinformation and “alternative facts.” Fighting for the truth — however inconvenient — means telling the stories of the deliberately unheard. That was the life’s work of Howard Zinn. And we need it more than ever.

\

Thought. Conservatives would prefer that history not teach the worst of conservative (racist) thinking; better edit it away, pretend it didn’t happen. It was all about states’ rights, and so on. I wonder if the same will happen about the 2020s, and MAGA. An embarrassment, best forgotten, 50 years from now.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The End of Reading?

  • The decline of reading, and all that that means;
  • And how MAGA folk don’t understand why the rest of us aren’t pretending anymore. It’s about conscience.
– – –

Things that generations take for granted can change and be gone.

The Atlantic, Rose Horowitch, today: The End of Reading Is Here, subtitled: Optimists once believed that universal literacy was inevitable. Now it seems that the age of reading might be a short anomaly in human history. [gift link]

The article begins by recalling the Library of Alexandria.
Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Politics, Technology | Leave a comment

Falling Birthrates as Tribal Panic

  • Another examination of the roots of falling birthrates, a global reality; I see the concern about it as tribal panic;
  • Briefly noted: make gun violence great again!; more about the latest GOP scare tactic; more about those who spread false history; how claims of voting by non-citizens may be evidence of clinical paranoia; and how MAGA cares about nothing unless it’s about America and winning.
– – –

So what is this about? Anything new here? This issue has been discussed before.

Slate, Jill Filipovic, yesterday: We Need More Good Men, subtitled: Conservatives often lay the blame for declining fertility at women’s feet. They’re wrong.

The writer begins with a personal anecdote about her decision, married and 39 and living in a small upstate New York town, not to have a child. Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Human Nature, Psychology | Leave a comment

The New Commie Threat

  • Robert Reich on the Commie threat, a tired Republican charge, recalling McCarthy;
  • Lazy Republican thinking about communism and current kids these days;
  • Twisted thinking about religious liberty;
  • A video of Paula White, presidential spiritual advisor;
  • Stephen Miller, divine providence, and mental illness;
  • Recognizing The Good Liars and the work they do to challenge MAGA folks;
  • And how folks who don’t align with tribal Christian values are “divisive radicals,” at the Smithsonian.
– – –

Anything more about the 250th? Or about Trump? Of course there is!

Robert Reich, today: Why Is He Using the Communist Trump Card?, subtitled “He’s run out of other cards.”

(The image is of an anti-communist comic book published in 1947.)

Trump has run out of cards to play in the midterm elections, which is why he’s now talking about the “communist menace.”

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, conservatives, Human Nature, Lunacy, Politics, Religion | Leave a comment

Toby Ord, THE PRECIPICE

Subtitled: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity
(Hachette, 2020, 468pp, including 225pp of resources, acknowledgements, appendices, further reading, notes, bibliography, and index.)

Here is book about existential risks, a topic on which I have several books, though this one and a couple other recent ones address the subject in the context of Effective Altruism. That is, part of EA would be to decide how to direct resources to avoid future calamities, with the usual cost/benefit considerations. Ord, along with MacAskill and Singer and many others, were mentioned in the Rutger Bregman book I read recently (review here). This one seems more specifically focused on risks.

*

Key Points

  • Author defines the “precipice” as the moment in history when it became possible for the human race to destroy itself, and places that moment at the explosion of the first atomic bomb in 1945. (And it roughly coincides with the beginning of the Anthropocene.)
  • This book is about existential risks, which he defines rather precisely. Not just garden-variety catastrophes, from which a small population of humans might eventually recover.
  • He places the current situation in the context of humanity as being some 200,000 years old, as having gone through three great transitions, the agricultural revolution some 10,000ya, the scientific revolution, only about 400ya, and the industrial revolution, a couple hundred years ago. Each brought problems, but average human conditions are better now than they’ve ever been in history.
  • And, there are potentially centuries ahead for humanity, given the average mammalian species lasting about a million years. If we leave the earth, millions or billions more years are available to us.
  • So it’s imperative now to avoid risks while we can take action to avoid them.
  • How existential risks are different from extinction or the collapse of civilization. He recalls Jonathan Schell, and invokes the term “longtermism.” This entails the economic concept of ‘discounting’, which places relative values on people alive today vs all those billions who may be alive in the future.
  • Then he steps through various natural risks: supervolcanoes, stellar explosions, the death of the sun; anthropogenic risks: nuclear weapons, climate change, environmental damage including resource depletion; and then future risks: pandemics, AI, various dystopian scenarios such as totalitarianism.
  • Part Three starts quantifying things, and comes up with a 1 in 2 change that humanity will survive to achieve its potential. Then considers how to prioritize risks, considering importance, tractability, and neglectedness.
  • Then a general strategy for humanity. Reach existential security; conduct a “long reflection”; and achieve our potential. The middle step is in MacAskill too. How expanding into space would or would not solve anything. What role a world government would have. What technological progress can do. With examples of what not to do, and what we can do right now.
  • The final chapter contemplates our potential: how long humanity might endure; some comments about scale; the quality of human life; and the choices we can make along three dimensions: time, space, and experience.

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Culture, Evolution, Human Progress | Leave a comment

A Muted July 4th

  • San Francisco fireworks hidden by fog;
  • Trump’s July 4 speech.

Last night, the DC fireworks being delayed, and the SF fireworks obscured, we were left watching Trump’s July 4th speech.

The fireworks shot off the Golden Gate Bridge were yet again shrouded by Pacific fog, as they are almost every year, from our viewpoint in the Oakland hills. (Actually, the SF fireworks are usually shot off from the Marina area; this was only the third time in history that the Golden Gate Bridge was shut down for a couple of hours, for this reason.)

We thought we might walk down to a prime viewing site, on a street below us, but by 9:15 it was clear that the fog would block all views. So we just sat at home and watched TV. At the same time, while there’s no official fireworks in Oakland, there have always been dozens or hundreds of local, likely illegal, fireworks, seen from our vantage out along the flats of Oakland.

As for Trump’s speech.

Continue reading

Posted in Personal history | Leave a comment

The 250th, Patriotism, and the Sin of Pride

On the bright side,

  • 25 reasons to be optimistic about the future;
  • 5 questions that will determine America’s next 50 years;
  • Connie Willis relates some potential optimism in the decline of MAGA;
  • Why Americans are living longer;
  • Nicholas Kristof on Nordic happiness;

On the dark side,

  • The dangerous idea that the United States was chosen by God;
  • Trump treats half the American population as enemies, now calling them “communists”;
  • Why church and state should be kept separate, as the founders wanted;
  • Thought: didn’t the earliest settles to North America flee the same kind of religious persecution that MAGA is eager to impose on others?
– – –

Today is the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, by the US, to separate itself from English rule.

*

Some overviews then.

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Human Nature, Human Progress, Politics, Psychology | Leave a comment

About the Appeal of Stories

  • How the great books appeal both to literary standards and our lizard brains;
  • With my speculations about the appeal of science fiction;
  • July 4th. The Guardian on how the US is a global citizen gone rogue; how the stain on America is the narcissist Trump;
  • Brief items about the MAGA indifference to Trump’s billions in personal gains, the jingoistic view that only the USA benefits from the greatness of Jesus; and Republican idiocy about wind and solar power.
– – –

What is the appeal of stories? Both in books and at the movies?

The Atlantic, Boris Kachka, today: The ‘Have It Both Ways’ Theory of Great Books, subtitled “Many literary classics have a way of appealing to our lizard brains while making us question why we’re so compelled by them.”

A standard answer goes to the roots of tribalism and the human understanding of cause and effect in the natural world. We tell stories to relate cause and effect, e.g. thunder is caused by the god Thor tossing lightning bolts. And we tell stories to valorize heroes and leaders who unite the tribe. Why the appeal of stories about danger and violence? As lessons about the risks of the world. Or as rehearsal to situations we might face. A kind of abstract, inverse, play. What about science fiction stories? But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. To the article:
Continue reading

Posted in Narrative, Politics | Comments Off on About the Appeal of Stories