You Mean Yet!: TOS #21: “Tomorrow Is Yesterday”

The Enterprise accidentally travels back in time to Earth in the 1960s, where it’s seen as a UFO, and then struggles to erase records of its visit and to return to its own time.

  • This is a fun episode that doesn’t bear close examination of its plot points or theoretical basis.
  • The episode opens, as “The Conscience of the King” did, with a brief scene without reference to the Enterprise – in this case, a contemporary US Air Force base reacting to the appearance of a UFO, and scrambling a jet to approach it. (No date is mentioned, but it’s presumed it’s contemporaneous with the viewer’s present, in early 1967.)
  • And then it’s quite striking to see that the UFO is – the Enterprise! One of the best episode teasers ever.
  • Despite Memory Alpha (http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Tomorrow_is_Yesterday_(episode)), Kirk does *not* say ‘subjective time’ in his log entries. After all, in the first one, he doesn’t yet realize the ship has been thrown back in time. It does however raise the question of what ‘stardate’ actually means, but this is a topic that, though raised many times, has no satisfactory resolution.
  • There are two areas of mind-boggling coincidence in this story. The first is the sheer physical exactitude with which the Enterprise, having encountered a “black star” and then been thrown some light-years, presumably, off its course, should happen to land *just within the extremely thin atmosphere* of Earth – not smashing into the planet, not arriving at some random point in space billions of miles away – and furthermore, not still moving at some great speed — but rather, as we see, limping slowly upward into Earth’s sky. (The image above is from the original show; the enhanced graphics on the currently available Blu-Ray discs greatly improve the images of the Enterprise among the clouds.) And over the US, another coincidence!
  • Later, at the end of the episode, similar miraculous exactitudes are achieved when the Enterprise, having slung-shot around the sun to accelerate and reproduce the time effect (though for some reason this time in the other direction, toward the future), passes quickly by the Earth and while doing so manages to time the beaming down of both its accidental tourists from this era who’ve managed to get aboard the Enterprise—to exactly the spots, or close enough, from where they were first beamed up. And via a chain of vocal commands! To achieve such precision is, to put it mildly, amazing.
  • A nit: Captain Christopher is beamed out of his jet in flight position, yet appears on the transporter pad standing up.
  • Christopher, 1960s US Air Force pilot, is appropriately amazed by appearing aboard the Enterprise, as he gradually gathers what kind of ship it is. Cushman suggests this is part of the charm of this episode – it visualizes a viewer fantasy for a contemporary person to actually *be* on the Enterprise.
  • A female crewman? Wow. Kirk mentions that there are only 12 like this ship in the fleet. It was an accident that the Enterprise is here; Christopher replies, “You seem to have a lot of them,” referring to the prevalent speculations about UFOs at the time.
  • Spock quickly realizes the consequences of Kirk’s rather rash decision to beam Christopher aboard: now that Christopher has seen the future, he cannot be returned to Earth of this time, lest he use that knowledge to make certain speculations that might change history – and wipe the Enterprise and all aboard out of existence, like a soap bubble. There are of course many, many theories of time travel among science fiction stories, of which Spock’s worry is a common one, but far from the only one; there are many other possibilities. (Examples: the past is fixed and cannot be changed, so that Christopher’s efforts were he returned would have no effect; or, the past might be changed and branch a separate timeline.)
  • This episode features a gratuitous humor element that I’ve never cozied to: the computer Kirk speaks to replies in a sultry, female voice, and calls him “dear”. Cpt. Christopher, hearing this in Kirk’s cabin, observes how people of his era have such interesting problems. Spock drolly explains that the computer system was programmed by the female society on Cygnet XIV, which gave it, of course, a female personality. And that to fix it would require a complete three-week overhaul at a starbase. But really: three weeks?? Whereas now we can change the voice option on our phone or in our car with a few swipes, in a few seconds. Failure of imagination.
  • Anyway, the voice is sexist. But fans at the time – and the producers, and NBC – loved it.
  • Act 1 ends as Scotty repairs the engines, but observes: “We have no place to go in this time!”. A startling observation, but… how could this be true? Did the entire Federation of Planets, as we later understand it, arise only because *Earth* emerged into the galaxy? Weren’t there other races who’d developed space flight and colonized other worlds before humans, whom the Enterprise might have sought out in Earth’s 1960s? Surely one would think so, but Trek producers and writers never thought very deeply in these directions, or avoiding doing so to not complicate scripts.
  • In a sloppy bit of plotting, as in “The Alternative Factor”, Cpt. Christopher is allowed to wander around the Enterprise decks on his own. Allowing him to knock out a crewman, steal his phaser, and use it to try ordering the transporter room guy to beam him down. Kirk shows up to belt him.
  • Leading to the scene in which Spock reveals that Captain Christopher’s *son* — not yet born! – will have an effect on history, heading the first successful Earth-Saturn probe. Christopher says he doesn’t have a son. McCoy, with a twinkle in his eye, says “You mean yet!” And Christopher realizes what this means. “I’m going to have a son…!” It’s a legitimately charming moment.
  • Then we have Kirk and Sulu beaming down to the base to try to retrieve whatever camera recordings and other data that would leave evidence of the Enterprise’s visit. It’s always struck me as amazingly coincidental that, by opening up a computer unit with tape reels, they can identify which reels contain evidence of their visit; and a bit later, find the photographic evidence too, so easily.
  • This episode is regarded as the first deliberately semi-comedic episode – the result of D.C. Fontana’s script. The next scene (after the female computer voice) that displays this is Kirk’s being captured and playing dumb. “I popped in out of thin air.” He’ll be locked up for 200 years. “That ought to be just about right.”
  • The episode’s endgame has the Enterprise trying to recreate the slingshot/time travel effect by swinging around Earth’s sun (though, as above, they think it will throw them forward in time, not back). In the original episode, there were no special effects to support this – we never saw the sun itself, just the Enterprise jiggling in space. The enhanced graphics for this episode do show the sun, and in fact shows the Enterprise banking closely around the sun – but in a nonsensical way that echoes the way the Enterprise has always been shown to ‘bank’ around planets it orbits – visibly arcing, and banking like a jet fighter would do in an atmosphere.
  • A recurrent Trek bad physics theme: “Since we passed Mercury… the sun’s pull has increased on us greatly.” No. The Enterprise is flying though space; the “sun’s pull” is only a matter of being in orbit, or doing a flyby; it’s a matter of the trajectory the Enterprise will take around the sun. It’s not a matter of the sun *pulling* on the Enterprise, as if it were an object not moving relative to the sun.
  • Anyway, this sun flyby works, as the Enterprise accelerates through the warp drive, and then passes Earth and achieves those amazing precise beam downs….
  • The Enterprise “passed Pluto”. Well, no; this presumes that the planets around our sun are somehow lined up, so that the Enterprise entering the solar system, or leaving it, would pass by the planets in order. While of course, at any given moment, the planets are in their orbits but scattered around the sun in their orbital arcs. Would have been better to say, “passed Pluto’s orbit.”
  • Of course, the Enterprise might well have been heading somewhere in the galaxy not along the Sun’s ecliptic; that is, at some acute or right angle to the plane of the planets. So ‘passing Pluto’ or ‘passing Pluto’s orbit’ would be an academic point, since the ship might well be headed in some relatively perpendicular direction. Trek routinely assumed – to the point of visualizing the Enterprise’s encounter with other spaceships, and the way it departed planets at the end of episodes – that the galaxy lay in some flat plane. Yet even the Milky Way galaxy’s plane doesn’t match the solar system’s. A prominent Trek example of how complicated physics and astrophysics is simplified for intuitive, non-scientific viewers.
  • And finally, the story ends as the Enterprise winds down its warp-drive thrust into the future… and gets voice confirmation from Starfleet that they are back in their age. Really? Exactly back in their age? The exact time they left from, before encountering that ‘black star’? Don’t ask.
  • Again, a fun episode that does not bear too close examination.

 

  • Music notes: the whirling music as the Bluejay 4 pursues the Enterprise is the ‘spinning cube’ music from The Corbomite Maneuver; and in the next scene, Cpt. Christopher’s view of the Enterprise is underscored with the ‘Fesarius’ theme from that same episode score.
  • The music as Kirk and Sulu slowly wander the hallways of the air force base is the slow, creepy version of the main Mudd’s women theme. We hear the “Shore Leave” bunny music as a wandering security policeman is beamed up.
  • The fight in the photo lab is scored with Finnegan’s fight theme from “Shore Leave”.
  • When the security policeman gets his chicken soup in the transporter room, we hear a version of the “Shore Leave” theme; the following scene, back at the base, opens with Courage’s “No Man” theme.

Blish’s adaptation, in ST2:

  • Blish omits the initial off-ship scenes of the US air base detecting the ‘UFO’ and sending up a fighter to bring it down. But he does spend a couple long paragraphs at the beginning providing some astrophysical background about the notion of “black star.”
  • In passing, Blish establishes that warp 4 is 64 times the speed of light.
  • On the one hand Blish describes the Enterprise as being in a “fixed orbit” around Earth, but on the other hand that the ship is “too low in the atmosphere to retain this altitude,” which doesn’t sound like an orbit at all. So even Blish doesn’t seem to have a reasonable understanding of orbits or how things move through space.
  • As Blish does several times in his books, he describes Uhura as a “beautiful Bantu girl,” which surely was never in any script.
  • In the scene in which Spock relates his research in the future contributions of this Air Force pilot, Cpt. John Christopher, Blish (unlike the scriptwriters) has Spock note that “There was a popular author by that name, but it was a pen name; you are not he.” He’s referring to http://www.sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/christopher_john.
  • Similarly, Blish adds a bit of background or perspective that didn’t occur to the scripters. When Scott says the engines are working, but “we’ve no place to go in this era,” Blish has him go on: “Mister Spock tells me that in the 1970s the human race was wholly confined to the Earth. Space outside the local group of stars was wholly dominated by the Vegan Tyranny, and you’ll recall what happened when we first hit them.” Fascinating.
  • And Kirk clarifies, for Christopher: “There is no such solar planet as Vulcan… Mr. Spock’s father was a native of The Vulcan, which is a planet of 40 Eridani.” 40 Eridani being a real star, only about 16 light years from the sun (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/40_Eridani). But no Trek episode ever established Spock’s Vulcan as being a planet of 40 Eridani. Anyway Spock warns: “If we took the Enterprise there, we would unwrite their future history too.”
  • Blish omits the entire subplot of Kirk and Sulu beaming down to retrieve Air Force evidence of the Enterprise, their capture by a policeman, and the inadvertent beaming up of yet another local.
  • As they discuss the idea of slingshotting back into the future, Blish has Kirk made an extraordinary concession: “I would rather destroy the Enterprise than the future.”
  • And as Christopher expresses distress for possibly losing his memories of this glimpse of humanity’s future, McCoy offers some advice, which at first repulses Christopher, then deeply impresses him. McCoy: “In perhaps sixty more years, or a few more, you will forget things many times more important to you than this—your wife, your children… You will forget every single thing you ever loved, and what is worse, you will not even care.” Christopher is shocked; but McCoy goes on: “I’m only trying to remind you that regardless of our achievements, we all at last go down into the dark. …I’m trying to call to your attention the things that are much more valuable to you than the fact that you’ve seen men from the future and a bucketful of gadgetry. You will have those still…” He goes on; it’s quite a passage.
  • Blish, more than once, refers to a “navigation tank” located presumably at the helm and nav station – a suggestion that a depiction of 3-dimensional space would need a 3-dimensional image, not a flat, round panel.
  • And Blish implicitly acknowledges the absurdity of the crew manually timing the beam down of Christopher as the Enterprise flings past Earth: “This was going to have to be the most split-second of all Transporter shots. No human operator could hope to bring it off; the actual shift would be under control of the computer.”
  • And Blish avoids the question of whether the Enterprise returns precisely to its own time, by not mentioning it at all, nor having the Enterprise contact star fleet command. Instead Blish ends with Spock alluding to the poet Omar, and the passage about the moving finger that, having writ, moves on.
Posted in Star Trek | Comments Off on You Mean Yet!: TOS #21: “Tomorrow Is Yesterday”

Links and Comments: Tribal Loyalty and Values v. Reality

NY Times: The 15 Best-Educated Congressional Districts in the U.S..

All but two of which, including the just contested Georgia district north of Atlanta, are solidly Democratic. Hmm.

\\

Also: Trump’s Lies, a comprehensive, up-to-date list. It’s not surprising that Trump lies (or at least shades what he says to fit the moment, or the crowd, without any concern for intellectual honesty or self-consistency), it’s that so many people, still, don’t seem to care.

\\

And they don’t care because politics is about tribal loyalty and subjective ‘values’, not recognition or reality or respect for truth.

Vox, Matthew Yglesias: he health bill might pass because Trump has launched the era of Nothing Matters politics, subtitled, “When in doubt, lie and distract.”

The watchwords of Trump-era politics are “LOL nothing matters.” If you’re in a jam, you just lie about it. If you’re caught in an embarrassing situation, you create a new provocation and hope that people move on. Everything is founded, most of all, on the assumption that the basic tribal impulses of negative partisanship will keep everyone on their side, while knowing that gerrymandering means Republicans will win every toss-up election. If you happened to believe that Republicans in office would deliver on their health care promises, well, you might be interested in a degree from Trump University.

And, Slate, Food Evolution Is Scientifically Accurate. Too Bad It Won’t Convince Anyone., subtitled, “The new documentary misses that the debate over GMOs isn’t about facts. It’s about values.”

When the topic of GMOs comes up at dinner parties, I am the skunk who will gently remind everyone of everything Tyson says about GMO safety in Food Evolution. I have a litany of facts and studies that I cite. After listening politely and patting me on the head like a child out of his depth, they always checkmate me with, “What about Monsanto?”

It’s hard to overstate the significance of that albatross on the GMO debate. …
…
Of course, the reality is that it is possible for Monsanto to be terrible and for GMOs to still be safe. …

\\

Via, Laura Huss at Rewire: Study: Anti-Abortion State Laws Deny Science, subtitled, “Are you surprised? A recent Guttmacher Institute report systematically documents anti-choice laws and the research that debunks their claims.”

Because conservatives and the faithful *know* things to be so, no matter any evidence otherwise.

\\

Yet it’s that this is essentially *tribalistic* thinking — not motivated by faith — is the only way I can understand the paradox captured in this article.

Forward Progressives: A 5-Step Guide: Explaining Christianity to Republicans, by Allen Clifton.

The five steps (with paragraphs of explanation):

  1. Help the helpless, provide for the needy
  2. Be kind to others and don’t judge those who are different than you.
  3. Be hopeful
  4. Don’t be a hypocrite
  5. Stop being driven by greed

I will quote his expansion of item #3, since it resonates with the quote from LA Times at the bottom of this post, about how NRA conventioneers are so motivated by fear. Here’s Clifton (with his links retained):

Republicans are nothing if not paranoid and afraid of damn near everything. From immigrants invading the United States, to Muslims enacting Sharia law to President Obama confiscating guns – I could spend hours dissecting how many conspiracies I’ve seen Republicans perpetuate over the years and how none of them actually came true. Besides, as people of faith, what’s there to be so scared of? If you truly have faith that God’s in control, shouldn’t your faith always be that blanket of hope that guides you through life? I’m not quite sure how someone can say they have the utmost faith in their God – while seemingly having no faith in that same God’s “plan.”

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Politics, Science | Comments Off on Links and Comments: Tribal Loyalty and Values v. Reality

Absolute Annihilation: TOS #20: “The Alternative Factor”

Kirk wrestles with a bizarre pair of near-duplicate antagonists whose meeting threatens to wipe out the entire universe.



  • This is in the running for worst Trek episode ever, with an incoherent premise, overwrought acting, and sloppy writing and direction.
  • The story set-up is routine: the Enterprise is conducting a survey of an ordinary, albeit arid, planet. (With an “oxygen-hydrogen” atmosphere, says Spock – really? Presumably scripters meant oxygen-nitrogen.)
  • Then some violent event rocks the ship, and who knows what else, which we see depicted as an image of the Trifid Nebula (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trifid_Nebula) – not the galaxy, as Cushman says – that is superimposed over our view of the bridge, and whirls in and out for a few moments, then stops. What was that? Spock announces that it’s as everything suddenly ‘winked-out’ – a moment of nonexistence. Moreover, the formerly barren planet below now shows evidence of a single human on the surface.
  • Three plot lines commence.
  • First, a crew beams down to the planet surface – yet another episode filmed at Vasquez Rocks – where they discover a lone human, a crazed man named Lazarus who talks about battling an enemy in a ‘holy cause’, an enemy who destroyed an entire civilization and who must be killed. They take him up to the Enterprise.
  • Second, a Lt. Commander Charlene Masters reports to Kirk that the event has drained the ship’s dilithium crystals, without which the ship’s orbit will decay in 10 hours. [Another instance of the Trek physics issue that orbits decay unless the ship maintains constant power.] Kirk orders her to ‘reamplify’ the crystals, and subsequently we see Masters and her assistant doing so in a special Engineering set we’ve not seen before.
  • Third, Kirk learns from a commodore at Starfleet Command (apparently they have instantaneous communication) that this blinking-out effect has appeared over a wide area, “and far beyond”, and this commodore is ordering evacuation of all Starfleet units and personnel within 100 parsecs. (Really?? 100 parsecs? *Evacuation*? Of hundreds and people and facilities out of an area 100 parsecs around?) Leaving the Enterprise to handle this problem all by itself.
    • Because it was dumb luck that the Enterprise just happened to be near the planet where this cosmos-threatening winking-out event occurred. What greater coincidence could there be in all of literature or pop-culture?
  • Sloppy writing: once aboard the Enterprise, Lazarus is allowed to just roam around the ship. We see the ‘blinking out’/Triffid Nebula effect again and again, and though no one else apparently notices, we see that Lazarus changes: the raving maniac with a bandage on his forehead is switched for a calmer, rational Lazarus with no wound to the forehead. McCoy does notice, but by the time he notifies Kirk, the effect has happened again.
  • For some reason Lazarus hears about the dilithium crystals, and for some reason they are exactly what he needs for his own little ship – a bubble-headed saucer prop perched down among Vasquez Rocks – and plots to steal them. (Curiously, there’s never a plot point about investigating this little spaceship.) This involves Masters and her crystal recharging room.
  • Once Lazarus installs the crystals in his own ship, he’s able to activate his ship and appears in some kind of negative/magnetic corridor, fighting another person – these scenes shot in negative effect, with a tilting camera to make the scene look unsteady.
  • In a scene with Spock and Kirk in the briefing room, the two make a series of remarkable deductions: that since there are (they realize by now) two Lazaruses, and since the radiation they detect from the planet is not from their universe…that there are therefore two parallel universes. That they must be positive and negative. Like matter and antimatter. Meaning if the two Lazaruses meet, that would result of complete annihilation – of *everything*.
    • This is a series of analogies masquerading as scientific deduction. For instance – why might there not be an infinite series of parallel universes?
    • Anyway, no, the two Lazaruses meeting would not result in complete annihilation – it would only result in the annihilation of the pair of Lazaruses.
    • Ironically, the idea of anti-matter shows up later in the series, not mentioned as yet, as being the source of power of the Enterprise engines, i.e. a fuel source, not a danger to the existence of the universe.
  • Further scenes on the planet, i.e. at Vasquez Rocks, involve Lazarus falling off a high rock a second time, Kirk accidentally transporting into the ‘magnetic corridor’ that connects the two universes, and Kirk wrestling the evil Lazarus into that same corridor – with two security guards standing placidly in the background – in order to trap him there.
  • Kirk meets the rational Lazarus, who explains what’s going on, how his civilization discovered the existence of a parallel, opposite universe, and this so enraged the maniac Lazarus, he became obsessed with destroying his duplicate.
  • The plan to resolve this is to trap the two Lazaruses in the corridor, and then for the Enterprise to destroy Lazarus’ ship on the planet, so they can’t escape. Leaving the two trapped in the corridor forever.
  • Which they do.
  • Why not just destroy the ship in the first place, cutting off the transfer?
  • Why is there one scene, the one with Kirk and the sane Lazarus, obviously filmed on a sound stage? And why in this scene is Kirk standing with casually folded arms, as if they are not talking about the existence of all existence?
  • Cushman’s book has two back-stories to the production of this episode that are more interesting than the episode itself.
  • First, the character of Charlene Masters was written in early drafts to be a love-interest to Lazarus. This was rejected by Coon because of the similarity to a plot point in another script in development, “Space Seed”; and thus some of the scenes here, such as the one in the rec room, are stubs of their original selves. Also, it was a tad daring for the time, apparently, for the actress to appear with a natural ‘afro’ hair-style, however short, rather than the stylized straight hair that black actresses at the time, including Nichelle Nichols, typically wore.
  • Second, the actor who played Lazarus, Robert Brown, was a last-minute recruit to replace the actor originally hired, John Drew Barrymore, who objected to late changes in the script and refused to show up for filming. Brown was hired the Monday night before filming with his character began on Tuesday.

Lawrence adaptation, in ST10:

  • Another late adaptation that follows the broadcast script very closely.
  • The adaptation reverses the order of the early scenes between Kirk and McCoy and Kirk and Charlene Masters.
  • The first meeting of Kirk and Lazarus occurs in sickbay, not in Kirk’s quarters.
  • The adaptation omits the scene between Lt. Masters and her assistant. Instead, there’s a scene between Lazarus and Spock, in which Lazarus describes his civilization, and Spock refers to an experiment he has in progress (which is his discovery of the ‘rip’ in the universe).
  • But we do get the scene of Lazarus breaking into the engineering room and subduing Masters and her assistant.
  • In Act Four as Kirk meets the second Lazarus in the alternate universe – at the point where the dialogue lapses and the scenes dissolves to a bit later with the same two characters – the adaptation has a short scene in which Spock beams down to the original planet and confronts the mad Lazarus.
Posted in Star Trek | Comments Off on Absolute Annihilation: TOS #20: “The Alternative Factor”

A Most Promising Species: TOS #19: “Arena”

Kirk is pitted in a one-on-one contest with the reptilian alien captain of a starship that destroyed a Federation outpost.

  • This is the famous episode, filmed on location (again at Vasquez Rocks), in which Kirk battles this green reptilian (though standing upright in humanoid fashion) ‘Gorn’ in hand-to-hand combat, with stunts and effects that look dated 50 years later, but which became classic and remains instantly recognizable. There was nothing else like it, in Trek, or any other show up until then.
  • Fully half the episode, though, is padding—the events leading up to Kirk and the Gorn being isolated. These scenes begin as the Enterprise arrives at a Federation outpost on Cestus III and discovers that the base has been wiped out.
  • (So the voice messages from Commodore Travers on the base inviting them down were faked? There’s a lot of that going around in recent episodes; and this time they must have been faked by the Gorns!)
  • The impressive live set of the Cestus III outpost had been built in 1956 for a TV series about a British Calvary unit in India, per Cushman’s book. It remained for many years before being torn down when Vasquez Rocks became a county park.
  • These early scenes include several innovations, first-time mentions of familiar concepts in Trek, including the first use of ‘photon torpedoes’ (with their distinctive sound) by the Enterprise, and the first mention of the term ‘Federation’, both contributions of scriptwriter Gene L. Coon. We also see Spock wearing an earpiece like Uhura, and uses of the terms ‘azimuth’ (for directions on the ground) and ‘parsecs’ (for distances in space); also some odd nomenclature in which the ship position is specified as 2279 PL, which a planetary system ahead is placed at 2466 PM. No idea what these were supposed to mean.
  • Trek astronomy vs. rote special effects: as the Enterprises approaches a solar system ahead, and stars still stream past in the special effects.
  • The set up scenes strike me as rather hasty in jumping to the conclusion, based on a destroyed base and a fleeing alien ship, that the Federation faces invasion—and, Kirk decides, the Enterprise must therefore pursue and destroy the alien. Spock does caution concern for other sentient life, in a nod toward Trek humanistic values.
  • In a dramatic if implausible scene, both the alien ship and the Federation are forced to an abrupt halt, rapidly decelerating from high warp speeds to a complete standstill. Sulu calls out their falling warp velocities. (Does dropping in warp speed involve everyone on the bridge being thrown forward somewhat, but not enough to splatter them against the front wall of the bridge? Apparently.)
  • And then an alien presence appears on their screen, a Metron, accusing both ships of invading their planet’s territory. We don’t see the alien itself, just some rapidly swirling lights, but hear the voice, in English, a calm, placid, wise voice. Somehow I haven’t remembered, if I ever knew, that the voice here is that of Vic Perrin, most famous for narrating the “Control Voice” opening of the earlier TV series “The Outer Limits” – in fact, here it is — and just as in that narration, the voice says “We are controlling transmission…” in this episode the Metron, explaining the duel to commence, says, “We will control them…”
  • Cushman’s book even states that the producers deliberately wanted to emulate the Outer Limits Control Voice, and so hired Perrin.
  • In a sexist bit, as Kirk vanishes from the bridge, Uhura, the only woman around, screams.
  • The clever and arresting premise of the show, alas, was not original, and famously the screenwriter, producer Gene L. Coon, wrote the first draft over a weekend and sent it to the network, NBC, for initial approval, after which NBC’s staff discovered that the script shared the basic premise and many plot points with a 1944 short story by Fredric Brown with the same name. So the studio contacted Brown for approval. He gave it, and was given retroactive ‘story’ credit for the show. Coon, presumably, had read the story years before and remembered the idea, but not the source.
  • Another new device: both Kirk and the Gorn are given handheld translator devices to communicate with each other. These props turned up in later episodes as standard issue Enterprise equipment, for the same purpose.
  • The groundside battle commences. The Gorn is strong, but slow; Kirk is nimble, but not strong enough to land effective blows.
  • At some point the Enterprise bridge crew is given a view of the battle on their main monitor. They see, as Kirk discovers, deposits of various minerals and other substances strewn among the rocks: white powder, yellow powder, diamonds, coal, bamboo. The Metron advised that resources would be present to make weapons. And so as Kirk deduces what can be done with them, Spock watches in admiration, and says to McCoy: “He knows, Doctor, he has reasoned it out.” (But how many people today, let alone 300 years from now, would know enough basic chemistry to be able to recreate gunpowder?)
  • Meanwhile time Kirk and the Gorn talk, and the Gorn accuses the Federation base of intruding on the Gorn territory. McCoy, watching, is taken aback: “Then we could be in the wrong.” The Gorn were just protecting their territory.
  • This is a nice sentiment, another nod toward Trek values that don’t automatically assign aliens to be the bad guys; but it doesn’t quite excuse why the Gorn would have simply wiped out the human outpost without warning.
  • In the finale, Kirk creates a weapon, a kind of cannon, and brings the Gorn down. Kirk can use a diamond blade to stab the Gorn to death… but does not. He pauses, and calls up into the sky, to the Metrons, No, I won’t do it!
  • And so the Metron appears, in the guise of young boy (with Vic Perrin’s voice), casually mentioning that he is 1500 years old, and expresses admiration for Kirk’s compassion. “By sparing your helpless enemy who surely would have destroyed you, you demonstrated the advanced trait of mercy. Something we hardly expected.” And, “You are still half savage. But there is hope.”
  • This, as with the previous episode, is one of the great Trek reveals, and a signal indicator of the broad vision Trek takes of humankind’s capability for growth, and its junior presence in the galactic scheme of things.
  • And both Kirk and the Gorn captain are returned to their ships, with an implication of later diplomatic contact.
  • In a final, almost gratuitous plot twist (made presumably just to avoid the imminent diplomatic contact just implied), the Enterprise is hurled 500 parsecs across space. Sulu is shocked at the positions of Sirius, Canopus, and Arcanis. (The last star name is fictitious.) And so the Enterprise sets off, back to Cestus III (why?), at warp 1 (i.e. the speed of light, which will entail some 1700 years to travel 500 parsecs; but Trek was never very careful about these issues).

Blish’s adaptation, in ST2:

  • Blish jumps to the chase, so to speak, omitting nearly the entire first half of the broadcast episode that concerned the discovery of the destroyed outpost on Cestus III and the pursuit of the alien vessel. All of this is summarized in the first page of Blish’s prose. (Blish makes no attempt to rationalize how alien beings could have faked voice recordings of the outpost’s commander inviting the Enterprise crew down.)
  • After that, the dialogue and action follow the broadcast script pretty closely. Per the focus on Kirk, though, we never see that the Enterprise bridge crew gets to watch the action down on the planet.
  • One big plot difference: Blish retains a line (from an earlier version of the script, presumably), in which, as the Metron reveals himself at the end, he explains that he lied earlier – that the Metrons’ plan all along was the destroy the winner of this battle, since the winner would obviously be the greater threat to the Metrons.
  • But since Kirk refused to kill the Gorn, the Metrons were left with no clear winner. The Metron does offer, after all, to destroy the Gorn ship—and Kirk hastily explains that that’s not necessary.
Posted in Star Trek | Comments Off on A Most Promising Species: TOS #19: “Arena”

Frequency Interactions

When I was a teenager, in the Fall of 1971 just after I turned 16 years old, and just a few months after my family had returned to California from a three-year stay in Illinois, I took a typing course at James Monroe High School, in the 11th grade, and my family (for some reason I don’t recall) acquired a small, portable typewriter, which I immediately took possession of, and kept in my room. To practice my typing, I began a sort of journal. The early months and year of this ‘journal’ consisted of much japery — spoofs of strange meanings of made-up foreign words, riffs on songs and TV lines. Over the next couple years, it congealed, if that’s the word, to a more conventional diary-like journal.

(Irony: the reason I took a typing course was that, entering a new school and despite having exemplary grade reports from my high school in Illinois, the staff at James Monroe was reluctant to enroll me in too many academic courses, let alone advanced placement courses. Thus, between my years in high school in Illinois and California, I never did have a formal American History course, or Biology course. The irony is that having learned typing at that age proved a great advantage in later years.)

In those early years, sitting in my bedroom in our house on Hayvenhurst Avenue, with my parents and three other kids younger than me, I can’t now imagine what my parents must have thought, as I sat banging away on that typewriter in the afternoons and evenings and weekends. (Did my mother peak into my room when I was away at school to see what I was doing? It never occurred to me at the time, but in retrospect it seems inevitable.)

As my typing settled into a conventional journal, I would write as if addressing some hypothetical person interested in what I thought and what I was doing. Is that the typical stance? Who does one write a diary to?

Of course I now, as perhaps I realized even then, understand that the person I was writing to was me, myself decades years later. And I deeply appreciate my early effort.

I’ve been preoccupied this past week — to the point of neglecting posts on other topics on this blog — with reviewing these early journals, in concert with my gathering of old family photos, especially of Apple Valley, and reflecting on what it all means, and how my living there influenced, or perhaps reflected, my personal inclinations and the life I was to lead.

My typewritten journal went through the mid-1980s, until it was overtaken by learning to use computers (at work, at first), and keeping logs and journals electronically, rather than on a noisy typewriter. The typewritten journal got fairly sophisticated over the years, combining the requisite angst of young adulthood with perception and understanding of the greater world that, all these years later, is not dis-respectable.

In particular, every entry in my journal had a title. Trends in titles changed over the years. Early ones were nonsensical, that is playful ploys on languages; some later years used single words, or two word ‘the xx’ phrases. Later ones — by 1980 and following — employed fanciful poetic or philosophical terms, phrases with suggestive meanings but no obvious allusion to the topic under discussion in that post, mixed in with quotations from songs or plays that had come to my attention. All these years later, looking back on them, I’m impressed. How can I re-use them? Well, here’s one.

And some similar ones, all from 1980:

Clouds, from the Four Quarters of the Universe

Collective Extremities

Science Fiction Distillations [years later, my short fiction review column in Locus, beginning 1988, was called “Distillations”]

Depth Structures

The Whiteness of the Dawn

Sublime Disparities

Transient Continuities

Conjectures on Ships that Sail the Moon

Shadows of Starlight and Symphonies of Mind

Prickling Dissonance

Tapestry of Refulgent Fuligin [my review of Gene Wolfe’s The Shadow of the Torturer]

Circular Explorations

The Last Day of the Old World

Always There Will be Greater

Transparency Contexts

Presence Fixes

Dreams that Can’t Come True

…and many more. In retrospect, it’s sad, I admit, that I was unable to channel these creative urges, for whatever they might have been worth, to anything beyond my personal journal.

Posted in Personal history | Comments Off on Frequency Interactions

Carl Sagan’s “Baloney Detection Kit”

Carl Sagan, one of the great scientist-communicators to the general public of the past century, author of the 1980 book Cosmos and host of the 1980 TV series of that name, has a list of ideas for how to evaluate any kind of claim, a “Baloney Detection Kit”, described many times and recently posted again here: 9 questions Carl Sagan encourages you to ask before believing anything anyone has to say.

Briefly:

  1. Independently confirm ‘facts’
  2. Encourage debate
  3. There are no authorities, but there are experts
  4. Spin more than one hypothesis
  5. Don’t become attached to a hypothesis because it’s yours
  6. Quantify
  7. Examine every link in a chain of arguments
  8. Occam’s Razor
  9. Always consider if a given hypothesis can be falsified; beware if not
Posted in MInd, Psychology, Science | Comments Off on Carl Sagan’s “Baloney Detection Kit”

Studying My Predators: TOS #18: “The Squire of Gothos”

The Enterprise encounters a remote planet where a foppish ‘squire’ insists on entertaining (and studying) them and challenging them to the death when they refuse.

  • I’m fascinated in retrospect by how episodes open, about what is going on before the Enterprise and its crew encounter whatever challenge will form the basis of this week’s story. Sometimes these are just as interesting as the main story, for what they reveal about how daily life aboard the Enterprise works, or what the writers and producers imply about the ship’s mission.
  • In this case, the opening establishes that the Enterprise is crossing some kind of ‘star void’ on its way to Beta VI, which it will reach in 8 days, and that they’re 900 light years from Earth. Routine on the bridge: we see a (female) yeoman passing out coffee; we have yet another navigator, this time DeSalle (for some reason they didn’t settle on a regular navigator character – Chekov – until the second season).
  • The ‘star void’ notion is a curious one, of no particular importance (and such an idea is never mentioned in any other episode), except presumably to underscore how odd it is for the Enterprise to come across a lone planet ahead in their path, as they do. As they approach the planet, Sulu, trying to change course, abruptly vanishes from the bridge, and then so does Kirk. Spock shouts out “full reverse power!” a bit oddly since they haven’t actually reached the planet yet. End of Teaser.
  • Spock orders the ship to orbit the mysterious rogue planet, as messages begin to appear on their screens, e.g. “Greetings and Felicitations.” Spock sends a landing party down to the planet, to the one small area that seems livable – McCoy, DeSalle, and a geologist named Jaeger – and the planet we see, in this episode, is a staged planet set (unusually, featuring numerous trees instead of sand and fake boulders). Nearby is the front of a small castle.
  • They enter the castle and discover Kirk and Sulu, frozen in position, and then Squire Trelane, playing a harpsichord, a foppish chatterbox who releases the frozen men and welcomes them all as examples of the savage Earth culture he’s been studying. As he admires humans for their missions of conquest, noting them as a “predator species that preys even on itself,” Kirk and the others realize Trelane knows only what Earth was like 900 years ago, given the distance this planet is from Earth. The subtext here is in line with Trek’s progressive vision of the future: that the violent past of the human species has been overcome.
  • William Campbell is great in the role; Cushman’s book mentions that Roddy McDowell was originally considered, and he would have been good too.
  • Spock, disapproving of Trelane’s antics, has a good line: “I object to you. I object to intellect without discipline. I object to power without constructive purpose.” To which Trelane replies, delightedly, “Why, Mr. Spock, you do have one saving grace after all—you’re ill mannered!”
  • Kirk keeps insisting they be allowed to depart, and Trelane keeps forcing them to stay, until the situation devolves into a personal duel between Trelane and Kirk, with antique pistols. Kirk takes the opportunity to destroy a mirror he thinks is the source of Trelane’s power.
  • The Enterprise departs, only to have the planet Gothos appear in their path again and again, as if by magic (or superfantastic alien powers). There’s some typically wrong intuitive physics going on here, as the Enterprise veers first one way, then another, to evade the planet, and everyone on the bridge *sways* first one way, then the other, as this happens. As if the velocities and accelerations involved have only that very minor effect on the bridge crew’s ability to keep standing.
  • A brief trial scene between Kirk and Trelane leads to a chase through the woods outside, until Kirk realizes he can call Trelane’s bluff, and simply breaks Trelane’s sword. Trelane reacts in childish hurt, and Kirk scolds him like a child. “You have a lot to learn about winning, Trelane. In fact, you’ve got a lot to learn about everything, haven’t you?”
  • Which sets up the story’s resolution, with a blatant deus ex machina that is also one of the best Trek reveals: two glowing lights appear above them, shining a light down upon Trelane, and speak as his parents, “It’s time to come in now, come along.” Trelane complains, “I haven’t finished studying my predators yet!” and the parents reply, “This is not ‘studying’ them. If you cannot take proper care of your pets, you cannot have them at all.” Trelane whines, “I was winning! I coulda won!” The parents apologize to Kirk, and let him return to his ship, as Trelane fades away.
  • This is great because it undermines the simple premise that Trelane is some powerful, malicious alien – he is that, but he’s also a child, and that explains what’s gone on so much more completely. It also echoes a recurring Trek theme, one also just mentioned regarding “Shore Leave”– that the universe is filled other powerful races whose presence only incidentally overlaps human exploration of space. It’s this repeated demoting of humanity as being the boss of outer space that gives the Enterprise’s missions their own special but limited significance, a certain humbleness to the human endeavor, and gives the show such open-ended potential. (A potential that, I think, was lost in later Trek series that devolved into politics between the Federation and the Klingons, e.g.)
  • Music notes: “Vina’s theme” underscores Trelane’s parents; the cat and mouse between Enterprise and Gothos is set to the Fesarius theme. A lengthy post about TOS first season music will soon be posted.
  • And then the episode ends with the by-now obligatory humorous note. Kirk wonders if Spock didn’t also play pranks as a boy—“Dipping little girls curls in inkwells. Stealing apples from the neighbor’s trees. Tying cans on…”, before Spock gives him a droll look. Anachronistic, too.
  • Final thought, watching the end credits of this episode: I wonder if anyone has explored the idea that the stills of scenes from other episodes, shown under the end credits, often revealed episodes that had not been aired yet. Teasers of a sort, for not just next week’s episodes, but for other episodes yet to come! In this case, the end credits show a scene from “The Return of the Archons”, four episodes on from “The Squire of Gothos” in production order, though presumably done by the time final post-production of “Gothos” got it ready to air.

Lawrence’s adaptation, in ST11:

  • The adaptation omits the opening lines discussing the ‘star desert’ and the urgency of getting to Beta 6; the latter is summarized.
  • Also omitted: Spock’s shouting “Emergency! Full reverse power!,” and the Act One log entry. Instead he initiates the full search of the ship mentioned by Scott at the beginning of Act One.
  • (Again, we might wonder why the navigator, De Salle, is suitable to lead a search party, but that’s a routine Trek issue. At the same time, at least Spock allows that both he and Scott are needed on the ship.)
  • The opening scene of Act Two on the bridge is included, by oddly has Spock refer to the planet as Gothos—something he has no way of knowing.
  • In the following scene on the planet, the adaptation has Kirk call Spock to update him—even though earlier it was established that their communicators weren’t working.
  • A couple scenes later, back on the bridge, Uhura also mentions the name Gothos.
  • When the Enterprise crewmembers are taken back to the planet, McCoy has some lines about how Trelaine would have been considered a little god of war, 3000 years ago on Earth.
  • (We might wonder, at the beginning of Act Three, how Kirk has the time to make this log entry, while apparently about to duel with Trelaine. Or is he retroactively retelling the story?)
  • The adaptation condenses, or is missing, much of the dialogue between Trelaine and his parents; in the broadcast version Trelaine had about a dozen lines; in the adaptation, only half a dozen.
Posted in Star Trek | Comments Off on Studying My Predators: TOS #18: “The Squire of Gothos”

Gary K. Wolfe, How Great Science Fiction Works

This is a course released by The Great Courses (http://www.thegreatcourses.com/) in early 2016. The course consists of audio or video downloads or discs (as lead Locus reviewer Gary K. Wolfe delivers lectures on a set), and comes with a 200-page booklet summarizing the 24 lectures.

The following compiles principle titles mentioned in each text lecture, omitting titles mentioned only in passing, and adding titles in the “Readings” section at each chapter end that were not already mentioned in the text. (And omitting some titles listed there that seem egregiously misplaced, including two or three reference to Gene Wolfe’s The Book of the New Sun which nevertheless is not mentioned in the text.) Titles that get multiple paragraphs and have subheaders are indicated with *s.

1, Mary Shelley

  • *Mary Shelley, Frankenstein
  • Other readings:
  • Brian Aldiss/ David Wingrove, Trillion Year Spree
  • Adam Roberts, The History of Science Fiction

 

2, 19th Century Science Fiction

  • *Edgar Allan Poe, e.g. “The Unparalleled Adventure of One Hans Pfaal” and The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym
  • *Jules Verne, From the Earth to the Moon
  • *H.G. Wells, The Time Machine; The War of the Worlds

 

3, Science Fiction Treatments of History

  • Mark Twain, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court
  • Sprague de Camp, Lest Darkness Fall
  • Michael Moorcock, Behold the Man
  • *Connie Willis, Doomsday Book
  • *Isaac Asimov, The Foundation Trilogy
  • *James Blish, Cities in Flight
  • *Philip K. Dick, The Man in the High Castle

 

4, Evolution and Deep Time in Science Fiction

  • *Olaf Stapledon, Last and First Men; Star Maker
  • *Arthur C. Clarke, Against the Fall of Night
  • *Gregory Benford, In the Ocean of Night, and subsequent novels
  • *Stephen Baxter, Evolution; Xeelee sequence

 

5, Utopian Dreams, Dystopian Nightmares

  • *Ursula K. Le Guin, “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas”
  • *Sir Thomas More, Utopia
  • Francis Bacon, The New Atlantis
  • *Jack London, The Iron Heel
  • *Yevgeny Zamyatim, We
  • *George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four
  • Other readings:
  • Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid’s Tale
  • Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451

 

6, Rise of Science Fiction in the Pulps

  • Edgar Rice Burroughs: A Princess of Mars
  • Hugo Gernsback, Ralph 124C 41+
  • E. Smith, The Skylark of Space
  • Stanley G. Weinbaum, “A Martian Odyssey”
  • Lester del Rey, “Helen O’Loy”
  • John W. Campbell, Jr., “Twilight”; “Who Goes There?”
  • Other readings:
  • Mike Ashley, The Story of the Science Fiction Magazines, vol. 1
  • F. Bleiler, Science-Fiction: The Early Years

 

7, The Golden Age of Science Fiction Stories

  • Campbell’s influence as editor; Asimov “Trends”; Heinlein “Misfit” and “The Roads Must Roll”
  • *A.E. van Vogt, Slan
  • *C.L. Moore & Henry Kuttner, “Vintage Season”
  • Other readings:
  • Mike Ashley, The Story of the Science Fiction Magazines, vol. 1
  • John Huntington, Rationalizing Genius

 

8, The Spaceship as a Science Fiction Icon

  • Jules Verne, From the Earth to the Moon; Around the Moon
  • *Robert A. Heinlein, “Universe” (expanded as novel Orphans of the Sky)
  • Harry Harrison, Captive Universe
  • James Blish, Cities in Flight
  • Kim Stanley Robinson, Aurora
  • Robert Reed, Marrow
  • Anne McCaffrey, The Ship Who Sang
  • Frank Herbert, Destination: Void
  • Cordwainer Smith, “The Game of Rat and Dragon”

 

9, The Robot: From Capek to Asimov

  • *Karel Capek, R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots)
  • Lester del Rey, “Helen O’Loy”
  • L. Moore, “No Woman Born”
  • *Isaac Asimov, I, Robot; and two later novels
  • Jack Williamson, “With Folded Hands”

 

10, The Golden Age of the Science Fiction Novel

  • *Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451
  • *Frederik Pohl & C.M. Kornbluth, the Space Merchants
  • *Arthur C. Clarke, Childhood’s End
  • Other readings:
  • Alfred Bester, The Stars My Destination

 

11, From Mars to Arrakis: The Planet

  • David Lindsay, A Voyage to Arcturus
  • S. Lewis, Out of the Silent Planet; Perelandra
  • *Ray Bradbury, The Martian Chronicles
  • *Kim Stanley Robinson, Red Mars; Green Mars; Blue Mars
  • *Frank Herbert, Dune

 

12, The Science Fiction Wasteland

  • *Jack London, The Scarlet Plague
  • *George Stewart, Earth Abides
  • *Walter M. Miller, Jr., A Canticle for Leibowitz
  • Cormac McCarthy, The Road
  • Neal Stephenson, Seveneves

 

13, Invasions, Space Wars, and Xenocide

  • *George Tomkyns Chesney, “The Battle of Dorking”
  • G. Wells, The War in the Air; The World Set Free; The War of the Worlds
  • Garrett P. Serviss, Edison’s Conquest of Mars
  • Thomas M. Disch, The Genocides
  • Orson Scott Card, Ender’s Game
  • Greg Bear, The Forge of God; Anvil of Stars
  • *Robert A. Heinlein, Starship Troopers
  • *Joe Haldeman, The Forever War
  • Other readings:
  • F. Clarke, Voices Prophesying War [nf]
  • Bruce Franklin, War Stars [nf]

 

14, Religion in Science Fiction

  • *James Blish, A Case of Conscience
  • *Mary Doria Russell, The Sparrow
  • *Robert A. Heinlein, Stranger in a Strange Land
  • *Octavia Butler, Parable of the Sower; Parable of the Talents

 

15, Science Fiction’s New Wave

  • G. Ballard, Crash; Concrete Island; High Rise
  • *J.G. Ballard, “The Terminal Beach”
  • *Pamela Zoline, “The Heat Death of the Universe”
  • Other readings:
  • Colin Greenland, The Entropy Exhibition

 

16, Encounters with the Alien Other

  • *Jack Finney, The Body Snatchers
  • Murray Leinster, “First Contact”
  • *Larry Niven & Jerry Pournelle, The Mote in God’s Eye
    *Stanislaw Lem, Solaris
  • *Karen Joy Fowler, Sarah Canary
  • *James Tiptree, Jr., “The Women Men Don’t See”

 

17, Environmentalism in Science Fiction

  • *Johanna Sinisalo, The Blood of Angels
  • *Philip Wylie, The End of the Dream
  • *John Brunner, The Sheep Look Up
  • *Ursula K. Le Guin, The Word for World is Forest
  • *Kim Stanley Robinson, Forty Signs of Rain, and sequels
  • *Sheri S. Tepper, Shadow’s End
  • *Paolo Bacigalupi, The Water Knife

 

18, Gender Questions and Feminist Science Fiction

  • *Ursula K. Le Guin, The Left Hand of Darkness
  • *Joanna Russ, The Female Man
  • Suzy McKee Charnas, Walk to the End of the World
  • James Tiptree, Jr., “The Women Men Don’t See” and “Houston, Houston, Do You Read?”
  • Doris Lessing, The Four-Gated City
  • Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid’s Tale
  • Other readings:
  • Brain Attebery, Decoding Gender in Science Fiction
  • Justine Larbalestier, The Battle of the Sexes in Science Fiction
  • Sarah Lefanu, In the Chinks of the World Machine: Feminism and Science Fiction

 

19, Cyberpunk and the 1980s

  • *William Gibson, Neuromancer
  • *Bruce Sterling, Islands in the Net; Holy Fire; Zeitgeist
  • Neal Stephenson, Snow Crash
  • John Kessel & James Patrick Kelly, Rewired: The Post-Cyberpunk Anthology (anthology)

 

20, The 1990s: The New Space Opera

  • *M. John Harrison: The Centauri Device; Light; Nova Swing; Empty Space
  • *Iain M. Banks, Culture novels: Consider Phlebas; The State of the Art
  • Dan Simmons, Hyperion Cantos
  • Alastair Reynolds: Revelation Space
  • Peter F. Hamilton, The Reality Dysfunction and following
  • Ken MacLeod, Newton’s Wake and following
  • J. Cherryh: Downbelow Station
  • Lois McMaster Bujold, novels
  • David Hartwell & Kathryn Cramer, The Space Opera Renaissance (anthology)

 

21, The Artifact as a Science Fiction Icon

  • *Arthur C. Clarke, “The Sentinel”; Rendezvous with Rama
  • Larry Niven, Ringworld
  • Bob Shaw, Orbitsville
  • Stephen Baxter, Ring
  • *Algis Budrys: Rogue Moon
  • *Boris & Arkady Strugatsky, Roadside Picnic
  • Gregory Benford: In the Ocean of Night, and sequels

 

22, Science Fiction’s Urban Landscapes

  • John Brunner, Stand on Zanzibar
  • Robert A. Heinlein, “The Roads Must Roll”
  • G. Wells, The Sleeper Awakes
  • *E.M. Forster, “The Machine Stops”
  • Robert Silverberg, The World Inside
  • *Arthur C. Clarke, The City and the Stars

 

23, Science Fiction in the 21st Century

  • *Nalo Hopkinson, Brown Girl in the Ring; Midnight Robber
  • *Nnedi Okorafor, Zahrah the Windseeker; The Shadow Speaker; Who Fears Death; The Book of Phoenix
  • *Lavie Tidhar, Osama, and others

 

24, The Future of Science Fiction

  • Jonathan Lethem
  • Michael Chabon
  • Emily St. John Mandel, Station Eleven
  • Junot Diaz, The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao
  • *Daniel Keyes, Flowers for Algernon

 

Posted in Book Notes, Science Fiction Nonfiction | Comments Off on Gary K. Wolfe, How Great Science Fiction Works

Linkdump: Science, society, conspiracy theories, the fear of NRA conventioneers

Science:

The Atlantic: Are We Living in a Giant Cosmic Void?. Maybe.

Scientific American: How the Science of “Blue Lies” May Explain Trump’s Support. Subtitle: “They are a very particular form of deception that can build solidarity within groups”

Guardian: Oldest Homo sapiens bones ever found shake foundations of the human story. (Well, newspaper headlines often exaggerate; but the history of science is a steady progression of filling in details and expanding the limits of what was previously thought settled.)

Sam Harris interview with Siddhartha Mukherjee: The Moral Complexity of Genetics. Mukherjee wrote the acclaimed book The Gene.

New York Times Sunday Review, Gray Matter column: You’re Not Going to Change Your Mind. It’s not just about confirmation bias:

But what if confirmation bias isn’t the only culprit? It recently struck us that confirmation bias is often conflated with “telling people what they want to hear,” which is actually a distinct phenomenon known as desirability bias, or the tendency to credit information you want to believe. Though there is a clear difference between what you believe and what you want to believe — a pessimist may expect the worst but hope for the best — when it comes to political beliefs, they are frequently aligned.

Jerry Coyne comments on Sean Illing’s interview of Robert Sapolsky

Psychology Today, via Alternet: The Deep Roots of Left vs. Right. Subtitle: And how to get both wings to fly together.

(This relates to my thought that, no matter what I might personally think is true or right, it takes a range of personalities and psychologies for a society to be functional. If everyone were just like me — or you– it wouldn’t work.)

Remembering that what we’re all really negotiating—the right balance of constraint and freedom, security and liberty—may make us more receptive to negotiation, and smarter negotiators too, not taken in by hyperbolic half-truths about the one true way.

Society:

QZ.com: A ‘coastal elite’ named Marie Myung-Ok Lee takes a car trip across southern US with her autistic son, and concludes, My road trip through Trump country taught me that staying in the liberal bubble has its advantages.

ThinkProgress: The strange origins of the GOP ideology that rejects caring for the poor. Subtitle: “No, that’s not what Jesus says.”

Handy term: Overton Window: the range of ideas the public will accept. It shifts over time, generally in a progressive direction — you don’t see conservatives campaigning against women’s suffrage, as they might have done a century ago — but lately the alt-right has made claims that their views — of nationalism, racism, white purity, etc., — has shifted this window back.

Is this an example?

Patheos.com: Wisconsin State Rep: ‘The Earth Is 6,000 Years Old, That’s A Fact’

Skeptoid.com: There Is No Finland: Birth of a Conspiracy Theory. Some people will believe anything.

LA Times Op-Ed: What happened when a 64-year-old liberal attended his first NRA convention

One common thread among the conventioneers I met was fear. Real, genuine fear. But that’s no accident. Protecting yourself from crime, real and imagined, is what the NRA is all about. The NRA’s America, unrecognizable to the vast majority of Americans except from television, is a very dangerous place. Lawlessness, crime and violence reign. Rioters rule the streets. Islamic terrorists are coming to your town. Unarmed women are rape bait. Unarmed men are cowards. It is twilight in America and no one is going to defend you. Except you.

NY times, Masha Gessen: Trump’s Incompetence Won’t Save Our Democracy. “History shows that stupidity and autocracy aren’t mutually exclusive. In fact, they go hand in hand.”

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Cosmology, Lunacy, MInd, Psychology, Science | Comments Off on Linkdump: Science, society, conspiracy theories, the fear of NRA conventioneers

The Need for Play: TOS #17: “Shore Leave”

The Enterprise visits a lovely planet where the crew discover that their daydreams and memories become instant reality.

  • This is a fun episode, but also sort of a kitchen-sink episode, in which many colorful things happen without much relationship to one another. You could swap out any of these independent storylines with any similar random events, and it wouldn’t matter.
  • This is a rare episode shot on location – not on a soundstage and not even on a backlot, like “Miri”, but away from the studio in a real natural setting. I didn’t know, until now, via Cushman’s book, where that location was. It’s a place called Africa USA, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_World/Africa_USA, north of Los Angeles in Soledad Canyon. It’s a wide spot in the Santa Clara river where an animal training compound was established in 1962. Coincidentally, I knew the area well, in the late 1970s and early ‘80s, when I was very into bicycling, and would ride long trips on weekends in every direction from the San Fernando Valley. I both bicycled and drove through Soledad Canyon many times; it was a backroad route on the way to Apple Valley, as well. (The area is also near where Steven Spielberg’s “Duel” was filmed.)
  • The compound was washed out in 1969, according to Wikipedia, and never rebuilt. As you watch this show, you see the river (not a lake) in several shots, and in the background, the dry desert-like hills on either side of this river valley.
  • A secondary location in this episode is the famous Vasquez Rocks (which was also used for two of the following three Trek episodes). Vasquez Rocks (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasquez_Rocks) is likely one of the most familiar locations in TV and movie in history – those big slabs of angled sedimentary layers are instantly recognizable. You still see them routinely used in TV car commercials.
  • The episode’s story is familiar: the crew prepares to beam down to this idyllic planet to enjoy a shore leave after a weary three months in space, but strange things start happening: McCoy see a large white rabbit and little girl, straight out of Alice in Wonderland; Sulu finds a police pistol like one he always wanted; Yeoman Barrows meets Don Juan; Kirk meets both an old Academy prankster, Finnegan, and an old flame from 15 years before, Ruth.
  • It takes them a while to deduce the obvious: that these things appear in response to their thoughts about them, whether those things are imaginary or are memories from their pasts. And these things can be dangerous: both McCoy and a female crewman are apparently killed!
  • On the other hand, they all get some kind of emotional satisfaction from these events. Kirk has a five-minute brawl with Finnegan (surely the most spectacular fist-fight in the entire series), and realizes, at the end, that he enjoyed it – it was something he’d always wanted to do.
  • The story also features a recurring element necessary for story tension: the landing party gets cut off from the Enterprise via some convenient energy field, or radiation, or whatever. ‘Convenient’ because otherwise the landing party could just pull out their communicators and say “beam me up”! Time and again in these Trek episodes, you can see that such a random story element occurs precisely to prevent this from happening; otherwise the story would quickly be over. (We’ve already seen this in “Miri”, where the communicators get stolen; “The Galileo Seven”, where the effects of the “quasar-like phenomenon” cut off communications between the shuttlecraft and the Enterprise; and “Dagger of the Mind”, where a force field prevents a rescue party from beaming down.)
  • McCoy’s death in this episode was a legitimate shock, as Cushman points out. While in general, long before Game of Thrones, you could trust that the lead characters in an ongoing TV series could not die – if they seemed to, somehow it would be a trick, or they would be brought back – at this point in Trek’s first season, DeForest Kelley was not a named star in the series’ opening credits, and regular viewers had already seen one recurring character, Yeoman Rand, disappear from the show without explanation (as mentioned earlier, it was mostly about the difficulty of maintaining her suggestive relationship with Kirk). So anyone watching this episode when first broadcast might have legitimately been shocked by McCoy’s death. Of course, the guarantee of returning stars didn’t stop this gimmick from being used in future episodes – Kirk’s death, at Spock’s hands, in 2nd season “Amok Time”, for instance. You knew that Kirk couldn’t die, so the suspense was more about how his apparent death would be rationalized.
  • Cushman also describes an interesting production decision, by the film editor for this episode, Fabien Tordjmann. Filming of the show at Vasquez Rocks included numerous shots of Finnegan (played by Bruce Mars) taunting Kirk from various spots over the rocks, and when Tordjmann got all the footage, he had a hard time piecing it together to look like a coherent straight line action sequence. So he decided to emphasize the randomness of Finnegan’s appearances, adding a bit of surrealism to the show, as if various versions of Finnegan were taunting Kirk from different places. When the producers and director saw the result, they loved it.
  • At the end a kindly caretaker appears, a member of the advanced race that built this planet as a kind of ‘amusement park’. He explains that none of the effects are permanent: McCoy and Angela are just fine (and they both reappear, unscathed). It’s a planet for ‘play’. Kirk provides the key insight, and the central line of this episode: “The more complex the mind, the greater the need for the simplicity of play.”
  • This is another example of how in Trek the human crew on the Enterprise encountered advanced aliens whose presences only incidentally overlap with human exploration of space. I think this was a constant theme throughout the series, one perhaps not as appreciated as the humanistic idea that mankind had solved its own internal conflicts and had built an idealistic society.
  • Cushman provides considerable background about the development of the script, written by the famed SF author Theodore Sturgeon but then heavily rewritten by Gene Coon and Gene Roddenberry, the latter rewriting scenes on location as the show was being filmed. Sturgeon’s concept was over-the-top and potentially very expensive (showing, e.g., mechanical arms reaching up out of the surface of the planet to remove the dead or deposit imagined artifacts). And the network wanted the fantasy elements toned down. And the network didn’t want another ‘illusion’ show after “The Menagerie”, an obvious concept the crew might have considered anyway, but is brushed aside with a single line of dialogue.
  • The episode ends with another humorous tag, as the bridge crew chuckle about something Spock says; another Gene Coon touch, presumably, here more appropriate than most, as Spock repeats his objection to the idea of spending energy to relax.
  • The music is by Gerald Fried, his first for the series, and resembles the episode: a variety of interesting components that have very little to do with one another. I’ll discuss the score in a separate post about the first season TOS music.

Lawrence’s adaptation, in ST12:

  • The adaptation refers to Yeoman Barrows as ‘the girl.’
  • This very late adaptation is typically extremely literal, to the point of having Kirk recite his log entry from the beginning of Act One – though the order of this, and the scene with Sulu and McCoy on the planet, is reversed.
  • The first few lines of Rodriguez and Teller’s dialogue are omitted.
  • Does it omit the scene w/R&T and tiger? Also Sulu’s Samurai—he reports it, but we don’t see it.
  • The adaptation does correct the odd line of Sulu’s: “Someone beaming down from the bridge.” To say “from the ship.”
  • The scene near the end when the tiger appears to Kirk and Spock is longer, with several lines of dialogue; as the two men leave, the tiger “turned itself off.”
  • Also, Angela returns to the living just after McCoy sends away his two chorus girls, with a couple lines of dialogue. In the broadcast show, she just sort of appears in the background; perhaps cut for time.
Posted in Star Trek | Comments Off on The Need for Play: TOS #17: “Shore Leave”