Varieties of Homophobic Experience

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jessica-joseph/getting-up-close-to-homophobia_b_5264373.html

Fascinating essay by a woman who reacts to “an intensely homophobic part of the world: the Caribbean”, and describes how…

I’ve actually started engaging homophobes in deep conversation, looking for the reasons, spoken and unspoken, that they feel this total incomprehension, disgust and dislike when it comes to gay people, especially gay men. My findings have led me to a sort of classification of homophobia into seven (often overlapping) types based on its source: gender norms, religion, ignorance, misogyny, personal experience, sexual insecurity or what I’d deem sociopathy.

Several of her categories correspond with the comments I made a while back, at the bottom of this post, about why people object to homosexuality.

Her two most relevant categories are these:

Type G: This homophobe’s stance is primarily rooted in an unnatural, simplistic, narrow, binary conception of gender. These gender norms shape their identity, their sense of pride and their understanding of how much power they wield in the world. They believe that anatomy determines psyche, purpose and personality, and that all men are supposed to be one way, want the same thing and have the same range of expression, and likewise for all women.

…

When you look at a map of the most homophobic places in the world, those places also tend to be the most gender-oppressive places, where women are often not allowed self-determination or the ability to achieve their fullest potential. This is not a coincidence.

Type R: This type of homophobe can be seen as a subset of Type G. They just believe that the aforementioned rigid and narrow gender molds are ordained by God. They usually don’t believe in evolution or put much stock in science in general, so they don’t believe in naturally occurring diversity, complexity and anomalies. They believe that once upon a time, everything was uniformly utopian in a garden paradise somewhere in the Middle East. They see gay people the same way that people in medieval times saw left-handed people: as manifestations of an evil generational curse called “sin” and/or being possessed by some kind of sinister force.

Type-R homophobes often deeply resent being called “homophobes.” They may actually believe that they are loving gay people even while saying defamatory, demeaning and discredited things about us. They refuse to recognize that their words and actions actually cause serious harm. Type-R homophobes claim to know that God shares their exact views on homosexuality, so for them, rejecting homophobic religious views is akin to rejecting God.

She has other categories, including the notorious repressed gays who lash out at others in response to feeling they have but can’t acknowledge.

Posted in The Gays | Comments Off on Varieties of Homophobic Experience

Rainbows and the Afterlife

Notes for an idea.

Had thought the other day to pursue the metaphor about human life being a transient state of a vast collection of molecules that will eventually collapse and disperse, leaving nothing behind, rather analogous to the way a rainbow is a temporary pattern of water droplets and reflected light, that once dispersed, leaves nothing behind. There is no rainbow heaven.

And the naive notion that there must be something more to the human mind (or ‘soul’) than mere atoms.

And to the idea, as I mentioned in the blog once already, that this is like thinking the Bible (or any other book), is a mere collections of letters, and therefore needing some ‘extra’ substance or power to have meaning.

The exercise is this: compare the total number of words in the Bible to the total number of atoms in a human body – or the total number of molecules (proteins, etc.). Suspect the numbers in the human body are vastly higher by orders of magnitude. So if the arrangement of 26 letters can bring about such profound human meaning in a book, why is it not plausible that the arrangement of many more molecules and many more different kinds of molecules -– all of which are continually interacting with each other, at the speed of electricity, and interacting with the outside world at the same rate — cannot comprise what we pleasingly think is something profound and therefore non-materialistic?

Answers:
http://answers.reference.com/information/terminology/how_many_words_in_the_bible

That is a combined total of 774, 746 words in the Bible.

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091023021908AAGOeL3

So if we take roughly 2.3 x 10^13 (23 trillion) as the number of molecules in a cell, and roughly 5 x 10^13 (50 trillion) as the number of cells in the human body, we get approximately 10 x 10^26, or 10^27, or one thousand trillion trillion molecules in the human body.

Better comparison might be the number of molecules in the human brain…
http://education.jlab.org/qa/mathatom_03.html

this says: 1.519*10^26 molecules
or about three times that many atoms..
That’s how many molecules in the brain for every word in the bible?

Posted in Religion, Science | Comments Off on Rainbows and the Afterlife

Trek vs Wars

A long Facebook post by David Gerrold a few days ago captures my own feelings about Star Trek vs Star Wars, and since I can’t figure out how to link it, I’ll quote it below, and hope he doesn’t mind.

Trek debuted was I was the magical age of 11 — remember the cliche “the golden age of science fiction is 12”, which is to say, you are most affected by things you experience at around that age. I watched Trek in original broadcasts when I could (and I especially remember which episode I saw on the hospital TV when I was recovering from my appendectomy in early 1969), and I became obsessed with the show when it went into syndicated reruns beginning in late ’69, with episodes rerun on local stations every weeknight. I compiled lists of episode titles, planet names, stardates, and anything else I could write down, long before all this information was available in books, let alone on the internet.

But I did outgrow it, or at least recognized how basic it was compared to the far more sophisticated works by SF writers. I watched the ‘Next Generation’ series in the ’80s religiously, though I think I did miss one episode, in the last season, which I’ve never bothered to catch up on; and I’ve never watched any of the episodes a second time. After that I never watched any of the later series at all. I’d moved on. (I was mortified when, at my father’s funeral 10 years ago, an old family friend, who hadn’t seen me since I was 15, described me as a ‘trekkie’. He may as well described by younger sister as a Monkees fan, which she was, once.)

Re: Star Wars. I saw the first movie twice, because Grauman’s Chinese Theater (as it was known then) in Hollywood did not clear the theater between showings, and the friends I was with wanted to see it again. So we sat through it again. I’ve seen the subsequent movies once each, even the recent ones, more out of duty than any enthusiasm. Doubt I will bother with any of the new ones.

Here is David Gerrold:

I’m not a Star Wars fan.

I loved the first movie, I enjoyed the next two, but after that … no.

Star Wars is a triumph of special effects over logic. Thought has been sacrificed to action and eye-candy.

It’s fantasy with spaceships and light-sabres and a mish-mash of stuff that ultimately defies logic.

By contrast, classic Star Trek was about exploring the universe, about finding our place in it, about discovering what it means to be a human being. Yeah, TOS was quaint, under-budgeted, and squeezed out through the filters of 1966-style television. But despite that, it was the most ambitious series in American television, because it invited the audience to think about ideas.

At its best, classic Trek was a faint intimation of what real science fiction could be — the books, the stories, the sense of wonder — but at least it aspired to invite the viewer into the genre.

Star Wars … meh. It’s a dead-end. It’s a self-indulgent exercise in toy sales.

Who’s the most notable figure in the Star Wars universe? Darth Vader — a guy who betrayed his Jedi training, murdered the younglings, was an accomplice to the destruction of Alderaan — and oh yeah, we forgave him all that because he saved his son from the evil Emperor. (Hitler loved dogs, but I’m still not going to forgive him for the Holocaust.)

Who’s the most notable figure in the Star Trek universe? Take your pick, Kirk or Spock. Spock, whose commitment to logic is unfailing — or Kirk whose commitment to justice is equally unconditional.

In the SW universe, a handful of rebels overthrows a vast sprawling empire with unlimited resources — it’s a universe of endless war where some species have been written off as terminal bad guys.

In the Trek universe, a federation of many races and species works together in partnership to build peace and partnership. Yes, there are battles, especially in all the reinvented versions of Trek — but the underlying commitment is still peace and partnership among all races.

Real science fiction is a literature of ideas — a literature of transformation. It’s a literature of possibilities. It’s a genre where the reader is invited to think about the very substance of life and what he or she wants it to mean.

Star Wars uses the scenery of science fiction, but it’s not designed to take us out beyond its own limits, out where the sense of wonder kicks in.

Posted in Films, science fiction | Comments Off on Trek vs Wars

Passage from Clarke, 1

Science fiction isn’t about prediction, of course, but some SF authors do take seriously the idea of projecting future possibilities. I’ve read several works by Arthur C. Clarke in the past month, and am rallying my notes on them for posts here; meanwhile, here’s a short passage from a very early Clarke novella called “The Lion of Comarre”. Our protagonist is walking across the African countryside, some 500 years or more in the future.

He carried with him that mist of unobtrusive music that had been the background of men’s lives almost since the discovery of radio. Although he had only to flick a dial to get in touch with anyone on the planet, he quite sincerely imagined himself to be alone in the heart of Nature, and for a moment he felt all the emotions that Stanley or Livingstone must have experienced when they first entered this same land more than a thousand years ago.

So here is Clarke, in 1946, anticipating the iPod.

Posted in Arthur C. Clarke, science fiction | Comments Off on Passage from Clarke, 1

What the Bible Says about Homosexuality

(Posted last night on Facebook)

The Bible backs same-sex couples: Point by point, why the haters are wrong

Matthew Vines has been around making his case about how the Bible does not in fact condemn same-sex couples for a couple years now. He’s not an ‘outsider’ to those he addresses: he’s an evangelical Christian who found his faith in conflict with his identity, and did some investigating and research. I’m not sure what his argument is evidence of: that the Bible is read superficially by most people, without understanding the historical and sociological context in which its pieces were written (not to mention the assumptions translators over the centuries have made about certain loaded terms); or that anyone can interpret selective passages of the Bible (or any other holy book) to support whatever case they want to make. Both, I think.

Posted in Religion, The Gays | Comments Off on What the Bible Says about Homosexuality

Blessed Are

This is an old Joan Baez song, from her 1971 album of the same title — an original song by her, after she had passed through her folk music phase and begun composing her own songs. Has some nice lyrics, e.g. “…and their personal acquaintance with pain”. And:

Rain will come and winds will blow,
wild deer die in the mountain snow.
Birds will beat at heaven’s wall,
what comes to one must come to us all.

(There’s no video to see, just that of a tape recorder.)

Brought to mind by this interesting item in Sunday’s New York Times: They Feel ‘Blessed’: Blessed Becomes a Popular Hashtag on Social Media.

Fascinating, because with a single familial exception, this is a phrase I never hear, not at work, not in SoCal social life, not at science fiction conventions, not in posts of any of the blogs or news sites I follow. And if I did hear it in any of these contexts, I would have to be careful not to raise my eyebrows…

The article’s take:

There’s nothing quite like invoking holiness as a way to brag about your life. But calling something “blessed” has become the go-to term for those who want to boast about an accomplishment while pretending to be humble, fish for a compliment, acknowledge a success (without sounding too conceited), or purposely elicit envy. Blessed, “divine or supremely favored,” is now used to explain that coveted Ted talk invite as well as to celebrate your grandmother’s 91st birthday. It is carried out in hashtags (#blessed), acronyms (#BH, for the Hebrew “baruch hasem,” which means “blessed be God”), and even, God forbid, emoji.

“ ‘Blessed’ is used now where in the past one might have said ‘lucky,’ ” said the linguist Deborah Tannen. “But what makes these examples humble-brags is not ‘blessed’ itself but the context: telling the world your fiancé is the best or that you’ve been invited to do something impressive. Actually I don’t even see the ‘humble’ in it. I just see ‘brag.’ ”

Posted in Cosmology, Music, Religion | Comments Off on Blessed Are

Hike to Parker Mesa Overlook

Today’s hike, a longer one, about two hours round trip: Parker Mesa Overlook.

http://www.hikespeak.com/trails/parker-mesa-overlook-in-the-santa-monica-mountains/

Same area as the Los Liones hike we did a few weeks ago, starting near the western end of Sunset Blvd near Pacific Coast Highway (PCH), climbing into the hills, ending at yet another spectacular mountain-top vista, with views to Saddle Peak (the hike two weeks ago) to the northwest, Malibu to the southwest, Santa Monica Bay directly south, and the towers of Century City and downtown LA to the southeast.

Two unusual events were part of this hike. At the top, on the mesa, was a group of 20 or so people apparently engaged in some sort of transcendental meditation ritual, seated on the ground in yoga poses. When they finished they got up and were all speaking Italian. Tourists, I’d guess.

On the way down we witnessed what must have been the beginning moments of a brush fire, at the bottom of the canyon to the east, along Palisades Drive — an area we drove through for our Skull Rock hike back in March. We could see flames, and the start of a column of smoke. As we continued the hike back down, we heard the sirens of fire trucks and police cars. Latest report is that the fire is under control, contained to about 5 acres, and no structures were damaged. (It is warm today in SoCal, but there was no wind, or it could have been much worse.)

http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Brush-Fire-Reportedly-Threatening-Homes-in-Pacific-Palisades-257866751.html

Posted in Personal history | Comments Off on Hike to Parker Mesa Overlook

Tonight’s favorite song: John Grant, Where Dreams Go to Die

Wikipedia has this post about the album.

There’s a lyric here — “I know you know I know you know that I know that you know…” * — that illustrates the idea that human minds are able to speculate on what other minds are thinking, to three or four orders (though not children; it takes a while for children to develop this ‘theory of mind’). It reminds me of the Ted Talk we were listening to this morning as we drove to the trail head of today’s hike. It’s a fascinating talk about the subjunctive, a grammatical ‘mood’ that exists in English and not in some other languages, like Vietnamese, and therefore an example of how different languages really do allow, or inhibit, different kinds of thinking. (And the subjunctive is, perhaps, the philosophical essence of science fiction.)

*Reminds me a bit of that punctuation challenge, to make sense of “John, where Sarah had had had had had had had had had had had the teacher’s approval.” Insert the right punctuation marks, and it makes sense.

Posted in Music, Thinking | Comments Off on Tonight’s favorite song: John Grant, Where Dreams Go to Die

Goonan Quotes

Like the meaty interview with Joan Slonczewski a couple months ago, Locus Magazine’s May interview with Kathleen Ann Goonan, of which I posted excerpts this afternoon, has several passages of particular interest to my theme here.

About science fiction:

At Georgia Tech, the student’s minds are prepared for science fiction because it’s one of the top engineering schools in the world, so I also taught ‘The Short Story in Science Fiction’ during my first semester there. Since then, I’ve taught the SF Novel, and used Neuromancer, The Female Man, Dawn, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, The Lathe of Heaven, The Diamond Age, and Zendegi. It was a wild ride, a lot of reading, and very intensive. The student’s enthusiasm regenerated my interest in science fiction – its history, its long-running conversation, its boldness in bringing important issues to life.

About brain/mind/consciousness:

For a long time we had no tools to study the brain, so consciousness was a subject for religion and philosophy. I minored in philosophy because I was so interested in not only the mind, but in what is going on around us – everything. I started from the ground up, I suppose, since gaining the tools to see what is very small or very distant is what moved humanity from religion and philosophy as explanations for phenomena to careful observation – science. Philosophy and religion, disciplines that examine questions like what is free will, what is life, what is really going on? They fascinate me. That is why my own interests turned from pre-science philosophy and religion to science.

What we think of as ‘reality’ is the brain putting together an idea of what’s happening around us, and we base our behavior on that interpretation. We live in a shared reality. That’s what the title, This Shared Dream, means to me. What we think of as the familial past is actually a lot of different people’s versions of the past. Every child in a family has a different idea family history, depending on their birth order, because their very presence changes family dynamics. That’s another thing I wanted to explore, because it echoes the concept that consciousness has much to do with how we perceive time.

This resonates as I think back on my own personal history and how different that history must have been for my siblings.

One more, which I didn’t include in the post:

I am always struck by the idea people have that consciousness is just in the brain. They think, ‘Oh, we’ll freeze the brain and live forever.’ That’s a mostly discarded idea now, although Henry Markram, head of the European Blue Brain Project, wants to slice the brain really thin, including his own brain when he dies, with the idea that all the information of memory and consciousness will be there. But consciousness involves your entire body, and time. A lot of what happens in the body simply isn’t known by the conscious mind. These processes are totally mysterious, and we don’t even realize they’re happening. It’s counter-intuitive, but it’s true: we are not just our conscious state of mind. We are not only our brain. We are our whole bodies, our entire hormonal system. Everything is all one system. The history of humanity in religion and philosophy is about how the soul will survive: the idea that there is something in us that is not physical. But I don’t think that’s true. There’s not anything that isn’t physical, including consciousness. If you are going to preserve yourself, what self do you want to be, really? What a nightmare that could be. In 2005 I was totally depressed – what if that’s the age at which you’re preserved, by chance? Or, ‘I will be in a perfect digital world and everything will be fabulous.’ It’s a bit like the questions that might plague one about the possibilities of heaven.

Posted in Quote at Length, Science, science fiction | Comments Off on Goonan Quotes

Another Revised Ten Commandments

I’ve been collecting these. This is is from Facebook today.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152110608613553&set=a.32904403552.30927.597123552&type=1

Posted in Religion, Ten Commandments | Comments Off on Another Revised Ten Commandments