What Would Be the Cure for Being Human?

  • Jim Palmer’s six existential realities that humans try to escape…;
  • Short items: Fox News provides the conservative need for the panic of the day, or month; even National Review calls out Trump as shameless; Pete Buttigieg on how Republicans take credit for Democratic projects; and how Christian Nationalists are plain about their intentions to “seize power.”
– – –

I briefly noted this piece back on 9/24. Let’s spend a little more time with it today. What does he mean by “trying to escape”? This goes to the core of his metaphysics, which I still haven’t exactly figured out.

Jim Palmer, Deconstructionology, 23 Sep 2026: There Is No Cure for Being Human, subtitled “The Six Existential Realities We Spend Our Lives Trying to Escape”

It’s 37 screens long, on my big laptop. Just write a book and be done with it! Let’s see if we can find his six.

Here’s part of his preface:

As Existential Health becomes established as a field of health, there is necessary work to be done defining its concepts, developing its theoretical foundations, examining its applications, and subjecting its claims to serious scrutiny. I have published an academic paper on Existential Health in a peer-reviewed journal, completed Volume One of the Existential Health White Papers, and am currently working on Volume Two, which explores the field across applied domains.

That work is important. But I also don’t want us to overthink or complicate what is ultimately at stake.

At the center of Existential Health is something almost embarrassingly simple: our relationship to being alive.

This is intriguing. Can humans ever understand existence and reality without resorting to childish religious myths? To Palmer’s point, what does it mean to be human, if it means trying to escape being human?

(Oh wait, he does have a book. I saw it before, when it was only available as an ebook. Even as a paperback, it has signs of being self-published. I’ll check it out anyway.)

So, here’s the paragraph where he identifies his “six existential realities”:

I have begun thinking of six in particular as existential givens: meaning, mortality, insatiability, isolation, uncertainty, and suffering. I do not mean that these exhaust the human condition, nor that every philosophical tradition would name them in the same way. They identify a territory every life eventually encounters.

Sections of this long essay expand on these six, with these subheadings:

  • Meaning and the Absence of a Final Explanation
  • Mortality and the Life We Cannot Keep
  • Insatiability and the Problem of Enough
  • Isolation and the Distance Between Us
  • Uncertainty and the Desire for Ground
  • Suffering and What Cannot Be Made Right

And then,

  • Our Elaborate Attempts to Escape
  • Existential Exposure
  • The Historical Moment We Are In
  • Capability Is Not Capacity
  • A Different Understanding of Health
  • There Is No Cure for Being Human

I’ve addressed some of these issues myself, via insights from science and philosophy. Palmer is a lapsed evangelical megachurch pastor. Does he have any insights from science and philosophy? Not that I can tell. Even so, or rather to the point, he is thoughtful enough to see through the shabby rationalizations of the common religions.

\\\

Otherwise today, I have only reports from the current ongoing civilizational crisis.

Posted in Human Nature, Philosophy | Leave a comment

The Biggest Inflection Points

  • Big picture: What we know about how life arose, a good summary by NYT’s science writers;
  • Relatively trivial items: Vance lies about gas prices; men in groups; Edsall on Trump’s real agenda; Krugman on how Trump actually hates America and what it stands for; Reich criticizing the NYT for its false equivalencies; and Heather Cox Richardson on charges from a decade ago that Trump is Putin’s puppet.
  • Mahler’s Das Lied von der Erde.
– – –

Decent summary. Not sure of the occasion.

NY Times, William J. Broad, Kenneth Chang and Carl Zimmer, yesterday 19 Oct: How Did Life Arise? [gift link]

Subtitled: “Where did it start? How did it grow complex? Why did it get big? Three moments in Earth’s early history when evolution suddenly, inexplicably turned up the dial.”

Apparently this is part of a NYT series called “Unknowns” — “A special project exploring unanswered scientific questions — the big mysteries about ourselves, our origins, our world and our universe.” — that also included that item about whether babies are conscious a couple weeks ago.

I’ll quote the intro:

Life on planet Earth is a riot of diversity: ants and elephants, frogs and blue whales, tulips and redwoods, even a branch of the great apes known as humans. Uniting it all is biochemistry, in particular the shared biochemistry of genetic inheritance — DNA and RNA, the universal instruction kits of life.

Tracing these biochemical threads back through time has convinced many scientists that all life descends from a so-called Last Universal Common Ancestor, or LUCA, that emerged between 4 billion and 4.5 billion years ago, after Earth itself congealed from the gas and detritus of a nascent solar system. How this LUCA rose from the primordial stew may be impossible to ever say definitively. No fossils exist to provide a window onto that moment in time, and scientists have no point of comparison: So far, Earth is the only place in the universe known to harbor life.

After that initial “how,” the questions become marginally easier for scientists to address. Here’s what’s known about three of the biggest inflection points in the evolution of life on Earth.

4 billion years ago: Where did life first emerge?

2 billion years ago: How did life get complex?

580 million years ago: Why did life get big?

There are many ideas about these questions, all based on the evidence of reality that sits all around us. (And not, as is my persistent theme, revelations from ancient prophets or appeals to imaginary gods, which are essentially story-telling.) A sample of the conclusions from the three writers:

“It looks like the early events happened really, really fast, which points to ‘first life’ not being the hardest part,” she said. “Maybe the origin of life was easier than we thought.”

and

One thing is clear: Once the eukaryote cell evolved, Earth was never the same. From coral reefs and giant squid to Amazonian rainforests and vast herds of wildebeest on the African savanna, eukaryotes gave rise to all the life we can see, including the one in the mirror.

and a counter-intuitive one, the kind of insight that I think might solve many of the so-called deep problems of science:

Dr. Butterfield, for his part, thinks that scientists have been looking at the question backward. He proposes that complex animals began to appear before Snowball Earth, not afterward, simply as the culmination of random genetic mutations. This revolution in evolution, he says, upended the food chain, altered the chemistry of the oceans, pulled carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere — and tipped the world into a frozen state. Big life caused Snowball Earth, not the other way around.

“To my eye, the single most insulting, ecologically insulting, thing that has ever been imposed on this planet,” Dr. Butterfield said, “is animals.”

Reality is far more interesting than childish religious myths. These basics should be taught as part of any curriculum, at least by high school. Humanity has discovered many things about the actual world.

\\\

I’ll note these just briefly. They all support recurring themes.

  • NY Times, guest essay by Kate Manne, a professor of philosophy at Cornell University, today 20 Oct: What Makes Men in Groups Behave So Badly?
  • This is about the Cornell incident.
  • My premise for some time has been that there is danger in any group of like-minded people, because such groups reinforce the members’ prejudices and tribal values, and discourage individual thought.
  • NY Times, another long guest essay by Thomas B. Edsall, today 20 Oct: Trump Can No Longer Mask His Real Agenda
  • “Trump, however, is anything but a routine politician. Throughout his three presidential campaigns, he claimed again and again to be the savior of working-class America. Those claims, however, mask his real agenda: to protect and enhance the wealth and income of the superrich — most importantly himself — while leaving driblets behind for the struggling working class.”
  • Paul Krugman, today 20 Oct: The Traitor in Chief, subtitled “Trump and his allies hate America and what it stands for”
  • Then why do they say they love America and those who don’t support Trump hate it?
  • Because Trump supports Putin, and other dictators. Reich elaborates.
  • The right dismisses the New York Times for their reasons. But some on the left dismiss the NYT for bending over backward to pretend that both sides have their points.
  • Robert Reich, today 20 Oct: Enough With the False Equivalencies!
  • Subtitled: We’re two weeks from deciding the future of our democracy, but what does The New York Times do? Bury what’s really at stake.
  • Hesitating conspiracy thinking, it’s long been speculated the Putin has something on Trump. (See David Brin.) That P is blackmailing T. How else to explain some things?
  • Heather Cox Richardson, today: October 19, 2026
  • An exchange between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump a decade ago about whether Trump is a puppet of Putin. He denied it. Since then, the evidence mounts.

\\\

Dark is life, is death. The Mahler symphony no one counts as one. Bernstein.

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Evolution, Music, Politics | Leave a comment

Speculations on a New World Order

  • Speculation on a new world order;
  • Tom Nichols on how Trump has abandoned the Western order;
  • Reconsidering what business schools promote;
  • Fareed Zakaria’s essay;
  • How Fox News peddles “fear porn”;
  • How the Trump administration is discouraging even legal immigration.
– – –

What might this new order be?

NY Times, opinion by Serge Schmemann, yesterday 18 Oct 2026: The Old World Order Is Over. This Is What Could Come Next.

Opening:

By now it is clear to most of America and much of the world that America and what it stands for have changed. The dominant face of that change is President Trump and his determined and deliberate efforts to accumulate greater powers than the Constitution apportioned to the president, to create a cult of personality based on grievance and vengeance and to challenge every aspect of the postwar global order, demeaning allies and courting autocrats.

Continue reading →

Posted in conservatives, History, progress, Social Progress | Leave a comment

Placeholder

This post from Oct 18 was a placeholder containing content originally compiled from Oct 4 to Oct 6. To represent them fairly, I’ve created separate posts for those three days, and set the publish dates accordingly.

 

Posted in Politics, Psychology, Religion | Leave a comment

If Humanity Doesn’t Have a Grasp on Reality, Does It Matter?

  • Wondering if it matters that humanity doesn’t have a grasp on reality, via recent politics about James Talarico.
  • And today: posted page Notes on Meaning, (and Wisdom and Purpose and Progress), part of my grand plan to identify broad philosophical themes and how they relate to science fiction;
– – –

A thought piece for today.

Slate, Molly Olmstead, 16 Oct 2026: A Hoax About James Talarico Went Viral and Then Fell Apart. What Happens Next Will Tell Us a Lot About Politics in 2026., subtitled “Texas just set up a natural experiment on the power of conspiracy theories—and whether it matters if they’re debunked.”

Title on homepage: “Texas Just Accidentally Set Up a Great Experiment About Whether Facts Matter at All in 2026”

If humans cannot engage in reality, what hope is there for our race?

Continue reading →

Posted in Human Nature, Philosophy, Politics | Leave a comment

Along the Spectra

  • In the context of the Tom Cruise film Digger, thoughts about the difficulties of thinking about climate change;
  • Neil deGrasse Tyson wonders if humans are intelligent enough to understand everything;
  • Fareed Zakaria on why Marco Rubio thinks the West is great because of pre-Enlightenment values;
  • A similar piece by Ishaan Tharoor;
  • And how a Kansas GOP candidate seems to literally believe in witches;
  • The running theme: the limitations of human cognition, perhaps one spectrum among several others.

Site is back up after a couple weeks repairs from hacker attacks. Here are some items from today and yesterday. Over the next few days I’ll post items I’ve collected over the past two weeks.

\\\

From a review of Digger, the Tom Cruise climate change movie that I haven’t seen, some perspective on how difficult it is for many people to grasp the scope of the problem. This goes to themes I’ve been calling scale-blindness, and the difficulty of long-term thinking.

NY Times, opinion by Jayson Greene, 14 Oct 2026 (but in today’s print paper): Tom Cruise’s Big Flop Is a Secret Masterpiece

Continue reading →

Posted in conservatives, Human Nature, Human Progress | Leave a comment

Something New and More Modern

  • Key points of a Democratic Project 2029;
  • Brief items: Kimberly Guilfoyle is out because she embarrassed Trump; Trump claims he doesn’t call people names (followed by a long list of names he’s called people); Trump keeps claiming that schools kidnap kids and force them to transition; Florida’s new science standards downplay evolution and climate change (of course).
– – –

The Democrats have a Project 2029.

Vox, Zack Beauchamp, today 15 Oct: The radical Democratic plan to change the government for good, subtitled “The party is finally mounting an aggressive response to Trump’s slash-and-burn second term. Could their ideas for a rebooted, reimagined Washington actually work?”

Continue reading →

Posted in conservatives, Lunacy, Politics | Leave a comment

Lying About the Economy, and Everything Else

  • The GOP has never been the better party on the economy, and Trump lies about everything else, too;
  • Paul Krugman fears what Trump and MAGA will do if they lose in the upcoming elections;
  • A church wants to instruct the government on hate speech;
  • And a MAGA pastor wants to execute Mike Huckabee.

(Posted 19 Oct from items collected 14 Oct)

– – –

“Because he’s a businessman” isn’t the argument they think it is.

Salon, Kirk Swearingen, today 14 Oct: The biggest GOP lie isn’t about elections — it’s the economy, subtitled “For 50 years, the GOP has told Americans they are better on the economy. That was never true”

As Krugman and Brin and many others have been pointing out for years. His followers seem not to have noticed this, either:

Donald Trump lies. Telling untruths is not merely second nature to him; it is of the first order, automatic. He lies as naturally as he breathes.

From his claim to being a great businessman and dealmaker to calling himself not the worst president in U.S. history — which he is, by far — but the best, Trump has spewed a firehose of falsehoods to the public. But he has never reserved his lying only for his political opponents.

Continue reading →

Posted in conservatives, Economics, Religion | Leave a comment

Actions vs. Beliefs

  • Do your beliefs or your actions define your religion?
  • Hemant Mehta on plans for the live-streamed execution;
  • Two takes on Marco Rubio’s speech in Greece appealing to pre-Enlightenment, pre-Scientific Revolution ideas about humanity and society;
  • Comments from Allen Clifton about what Republicans say they are about versus what they do.

(Posted 19 Oct, from items collected 13 Oct)

– – –

Several items that seem to align today.

I know that the various religions disagree on this point — some say only belief (faith) matters, others that actions count as much or more — but the take here is on how this philosopher would *define* religions. (Also, I just noticed that this regular contributor to Big Think has his own substack.)

Big Think, Jonny Thomson, 12 Oct 2026: You’re a Christian and a Buddhist (whether you like it or not), subtitled “Is religion defined more by beliefs or practices?”
Continue reading →

Posted in conservatives | Comments Off on Actions vs. Beliefs

When the Barbarians Are In Charge

  • A Republican *had* to use fake footage [i.e. lie] in an ad in order to attract voters;
  • Whatever the meaning of life, people are more desperate to find it as they near death;
  • Fill the government with barbarians, and you get a government that would conduct executions in public;
  • How progress in science is often made when you don’t know what you’re looking for.

(Belatedly posted 19 Oct, items collected 12 Oct)

– – –

LGBTQNation, Alex Bollinger, today 12Oct: “AI slop”: GOP ad uses fake footage of opponent saying he supports men beating girls in sports, subtitled “The Republican behind the wildly transphobic ad said he had to do it to get Latino voters.”

He *had to do it* — use fake footage — in order to attract voters. Because his moral priorities apparently transcend mere lying.

Continue reading →

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Meaning, Science, Tribalism | Comments Off on When the Barbarians Are In Charge