First let’s finish the second Robert Reich item we began yesterday. Then the drones.
Robert Reich, 13 Dec 2024: America’s four stories (Part 2)
Continue reading
First let’s finish the second Robert Reich item we began yesterday. Then the drones.
Robert Reich, 13 Dec 2024: America’s four stories (Part 2)
Continue reading
I’ve been curious, but have never been sufficiently tempted, to watch or listen to right-wing media for any period of time. These two pieces confirm my impression that most of its content is about fear and outrage. Fear of a complex world conservatives don’t understand, outrage that nobody does anything about it. They just want to make it all go away, and presumably are pleased that Trump seems intent on dismantling most of the government, and making all those icky immigrants disappear. (Which of course he won’t be able to do.)
This short AlterNet piece, ‘Alternate reality’: What happened when an NYT reporter immersed himself in far-right media, posted Dec 13, summarizes this much longer NYT piece:
NY Times, Stuart A. Thompson, 13 Dec 2024: I Traded My News Apps for Rumble, the Right-Wing YouTube. Here’s What I Saw.
The writer watched 47 hours of video on Rumble for this article, beginning two weeks after the election
Continue reading
Infrastructure note. I’ve installed an initial set of theme pages under the “NF Reviews” menu item above, which appear as items in a drop down menu. All the titles on the main page are on one (and only one) of the theme pages, though many of them straddle one or more of the nominal ten themes. I’ll figure out some way of cross-referencing them.
\\
Robert Reich has a couple long posts this week titled “America’s four stories” and how Republicans have done better aligning themselves with them than the Democrats have. Haven’t read them yet. But at a glance I’m fascinated in that the four stories represent a kind of American mythology of how the world is and how Americans are supposed to behave. American behave as if these stories are truths handed down from on high, but of course they’re only *stories*, narratives, derived from the circumstances of where Americans came from and what they did when they got here — and other nations and cultures surely have different stories.
Robert Reich, 12 Dec 2024: America’s four stories (Part 1), subtitled “Trump has offered extreme versions. The Democrats stopped offering them at all.”
One of my running themes — here on this blog, in the reviews I’ve written of SF novels and stories in recent years, in my essay for Gary Westfahl awaiting publication, and in my book if I manage to write it — is that some of the ideals and presumptions of even the best science fiction of the 20th century are turning out to be totally wrong. The standard examples are: there are plenty of reasons to think that ESP, telepathy, precognition, all of that, is bunk, mere wishful thinking based on infantile perceptions of the world; and notions of easy interstellar travel that beg questions about how such travel will take place (given physics), and whether there are actually habitable planets out there we can just drop in on and build a colony. The principle reason here is that science has advanced greatly over the past century. Some of what science fiction might have legitimately speculated about 70 years ago is now out of bounds, if we’re being honest. (An earlier example: hollow Earth.) These presumptions persist in pop sci-fi — TV and movies, especially including Trek and Wars — and of course they appeal to the popular imagination in exactly the same way all those psychological biases do, that lure us into magical thinking and conspiracy theories. It’s fun to watch spaceships zooming from planet to planet in 5 minutes, and pretty to think it might be possible with technology advanced enough, but it’s unlikely to ever happen.
A few science fiction writers have realized this, the standard example, again, being Kim Stanley Robinson’s 2015 novel AURORA. But pop sci-fi, and even many published works, still attract more readers by appealing to intuitively thrilling but discredited notions.
Here’s an example of a scientist pointing out problems with one traditional science fiction, and pop sci-fi, presumption.
Big Think, Adam Frank, 11 Dec 2024: Galactic civilizations may be impossible. Here’s why., subtitled “The problem for galactic-scale civilizations comes down to two numbers.”
We took both our cars into the indie BMW shop we’ve been going to, for routine maintenance. In my case, I needed my car to be ship-shape before driving down to LA in a couple weeks.
\
Infrastructure note. In parallel with similar tasks on sfadb, I’ve spent some time in the past couple weeks updating and databasing my Nonfiction Reviews page, what you get when you click on “NF Reviews” in the menu bar above. I’ve added a couple three dozen descriptions for books I’ve blogged about the past couple years, and added stubs for other titles I’ve read but not yet blogged about. Next, I think, I’ll create subpages by theme (like the one for Math that’s already there), maybe a page listing recently read books chronologically, and maybe a listing just the highest rated (five *) books. And then, similar overhaul of the SF Reviews and other reviews pages. This is quite research; it’s more like, organizing my notes as part of research…
\\\
Time, Sam Jacobs, 12 Dec 2024: 2024: The Choice: Donald Trump
For 97 years, the editors of TIME have been picking the Person of the Year: the individual who, for better or for worse, Continue reading
Last night’s column by Heather Cox Richardson reminds us about Human Rights Day, celebrated internationally since the United Nations, 76 years ago, announced the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in the years just after World War II. (Which can be found here.) Richardson sketches the state of the world at the time. Many principles of the UDHR are familiar from American’s own Bill of Rights and various amendments, but we don’t have many of them — notably not “equal rights of men and women” since American conservatives, essentially tribal in their thinking, do not actually approve of rights for those beyond their immediate kind. Sad but true.
I’ve had a couple items in the last couple weeks about how people prefer ignorance and belief to knowledge, even when knowledge is readily available. But suppose we’re not even aware of being ignorant?
Big Think, Daniel R. DeNicola, 8 Dec 2024 (from The MIT Press Reader): Plato’s cave and the stubborn persistence of ignorance, subtitled “Plato’s cave metaphor illustrates the cognitive trap of ignorance, where we may be unaware of the limitations of our understanding.”
Two items today relate the Zakaria piece noted yesterday, about the collapse of trust in institutions in preference to individuals. First is this, relevant somewhat indirectly, but important journalistically.
NY Times, Paul Krugman, 9 Dec 2024: My Last Column: Finding Hope in an Age of Resentment [gift link]
Paul Krugman is retiring from writing his column for the NY Times, which he’s been doing since January 2000! So what does he have to say about what’s changed in 25 years?
Today we attended a neighborhood “Holiday Cookies” part, around the corner and down Crestmont from our place. I made “Mexican Wedding Cookies,” which used to be called “Mexican Wedding Cakes” in my family cookbook. It’s odd how in the first five years we lived here (we’ve been here almost 10 years!, since Feb 2015), we barely met any of our neighbors. Now, gradually, we’re meeting more and more. Of course it’s helped that since the pandemic, and everyone working from home, and my exercise (walking) requirements, we go for walks virtually every day, and have more opportunity to run into our neighbors.
\\\
Opinion piece by Fareed Zakaria, whose 2020 book I quite admired.
Washington Post, Fareed Zakaria, 6 Dec 2024: Why democracies, from South Korea to France to the U.S., are in crisis, subtitled “To save liberal democracy, save its institutions.”
I missed posting yesterday because there was a Locus Foundation meeting (via Zoom) that began at 3pm my time and ran until 5:30pm, right through my blogging hour. At 5:30 it was time to get ready for dinner with my partner. The meeting was mostly a presentation by two consultants Liza had hired to provide a vision of how Locus might continue and thrive. Many things might change in the next year; I can say no more.
\\\
Let’s see what I can choose from, among the links I’ve compiled from the past two days.
LA Times, Aine Seitz McCarthy, 5 Dec 2024: Opinion: America needs to retake Econ 101
If they ever took it at all, is my thought. I never took an econ course, but I read the news and follow economists like Robert Reich and Paul Krugman and have gathered that many things most people think are obvious about the economy simply aren’t true.
Politicians of all stripes need to move away from selling voters the false promise that they have control over inflation and globalization. … As voters, it is also our job to learn some basic economics, at least enough to understand supply and demand for housing; the effect of tariffs, taxes and subsidies as tools; and the causes of inflation.
With a list of economic policies that might actually work to do what Americans want: expand the earned income tax credit; expand the child tax credit; build more housing; subsidize child care.