Skiffy Flix: Red Planet Mars

Now we come to one of the strangest SF movies of the early 1950s, and ultimately the most risible.

This is a 1952 movie about an American astronomer — played by Peter Graves, later of Mission: Impossible and Airplane fame — who sees telescopic photos of Mars and concludes that an intelligent civilization lives there. So he manages to send a signal (via Morse Code) and gets replies that indicate an advanced civilization there that has developed all sort of high technology dwarfing anything on Earth. This news crashes the world economy. Meanwhile, a Russian agent living in the Andes, of all places, intercepts his signals and… maybe is faking the Martian replies. But the movie wants to have it another way, to salve religious sensibilities.

Continue reading

Posted in Movies, Skiffy Flix | Leave a comment

Cognitive Health and Reading

  • Cultural norms changed about exercise, and maybe they can change to address the harms of social media — by reading more;
  • How the faithful grasp at straws to find societal reassurance;
  • More about JD Vance and demons;
  • How the government is purging information about gender identity;
  • Rufus Wainwright’s “Greek Song”.
– – –

Here’s another item that’s about, in part, reading.

NY Times, guest essay by Cal Newport, 27 Mar 2026: There’s a Good Reason You Can’t Concentrate [gift link]

The essay begins with a reminder that cultural norms change.

Today we take for granted that diet and exercise are vitally important for our health and well-being. But we didn’t always think this way. Much of this awareness emerged in a remarkably short time during the middle of the last century.

In 1955, President Dwight Eisenhower suffered a heart attack after playing golf in Denver. This event shocked the nation. The president was just 64 years old and projected American strength and vitality. The surgeon general at the time said that hearing the news about the heart attack was like learning about the bombing of Pearl Harbor.

Continue reading

Posted in Lunacy, Music, Psychology | Leave a comment

David Brin, THE TRANSPARENT SOCIETY

Subtitled: Will Technology Force Us to Choose Between Privacy and Freedom?
(Addison Wesley, April 1998, 378pp, including 42pp of notes, follow-up, acknowledgements, index, and about the author.)

Here is a book that has sat my shelves for over a quarter century, unread. At the same time, I see enough of Brin’s commentaries on Facebook, and in his weekly blog posts, to know where he’s coming from. So for this book, I’ve given a sort of ‘inspectional’ or ‘summary’ reading, not a close reading of every chapter. This means I’m trying to spot the subjects he discusses, and focus in only on those I find especially pertinent to my own interests. And there were a couple of those. The most interesting core of the book is Chapter 5, about human nature and the maturity thesis. “We must choose it because it’s our only hope.”

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Human Nature, Human Progress, Technology | Comments Off on David Brin, THE TRANSPARENT SOCIETY

Again, No Kings

  • Noting the rallies held today, bigger than those last time;
  • Pieces today about how MAGA is entering the ‘acceptance’ stage of death, and how there’s no way to redeem Trump’s dismal second presidency;
  • Who are the 100 million people Bovino and Bo French want to deport?
  • How the “great man” theory of history might actually apply to Trump, since ‘great men’ aren’t necessarily good, and how progress in the world doesn’t necessarily include moral progress;
  • Philip Glass’s and Leonard Cohen’s Book of Longing.
– – –

No, I didn’t attend any of the No Kings rallies today, but that’s because I’ve never attended any kind of protest or rally (I’m just not that kind of person), and now I’m old enough that I wouldn’t be able to be on my feet comfortably, especially in the hot sun, for hours and hours. But I’m following the news. From Fb:

Two pieces today.
Continue reading

Posted in authoritarianism, Human Nature, Music, Politics | Comments Off on Again, No Kings

Reading and Introspection

  • Assessing American literacy, and the claim that being able to read a New York Times article puts you into the “hyper-literate educated elite”;
  • How Trump doesn’t read, at all.
  • How powerful tech oligarchs think introspection is dumb;
  • The new homophobia is part of yet another swing of human nature, which reading and empathy and introspection might overcome, if conservatives did not reject them;
  • Short items: Hegseth rejects women and blacks from promotions; MAGA promises to outbreed the “hideous” left; Trump gets another bogus award.
  • Rufus Wainwright, “Go or Go Ahead,” studio version.
– – –

Facebook, 25 Mar 2026: D.J. Grothe’s post

If you have the basic literacy skills to read and comprehend a New York Times article, you’re in a “weird, out of touch, elite bubble.” Widespread low levels of literacy are bad for our republic and make people vulnerable to the worst sorts of people taking advantage of them. (I’ll also say that algorithmic attention capture, as well as epistemic collapse — or what political scientists call “truth decay” — where there’s widespread declining agreement on basic facts, and a public sphere where social media competes with the institutions that used to provide the public basic information about the world, make it very hard for a society yo govern itself, although both of these are supercharged by lower levels of literacy even as they also promote lower levels of literacy, in a vicious cycle.)

Continue reading

Posted in Human Nature, Music, Politics, Psychology, Tribalism | Comments Off on Reading and Introspection

What Is American Exceptionalism, Really?

  • Lydia Polgreen on how the problem isn’t Trump, it’s America;
  • David French wonders if America is so rich, why are Americans so miserable?
  • Faith that climate change isn’t real;
  • Short items: that classic poll against Arabic numerals; how people who lose elections don’t trust elections; yet another Jewish plot; a bloodthirsty prayer; another conservative convicted of what conservatives rail against; Biblical worldview;
  • Radiohead’s “How to Disappear Completely”.
– – –

It’s not just Trump. It’s some deep undercurrent in American culture.

NY Times, opinion by Lydia Polgreen, today: It’s Not Trump. It’s America. [gift link]

Like a lot of other Americans, I’ve oscillated in these dark times between two emotional poles. At points, I tell myself that Donald Trump is a uniquely malevolent figure who has seized levers of power that no previous president had ever dared to grasp. The story doesn’t stop state violence in the streets or illegal military operations abroad. Yet it has its comforts. Once Trump passes from the scene — as the laws of nature, if not politics, require — some kind of restoration of the American democratic and constitutional project can take place.

Continue reading

Posted in Lunacy, Music, Politics, Psychology, Religion | Comments Off on What Is American Exceptionalism, Really?

Skiffy Flix: Invaders from Mars

This is a 1953 film that holds special significance for me since it was likely the first science fiction movie I ever saw, even if I saw it only in part at the time, which would be 1965 or 1966. As with Lost in Space, which had debuted in the Fall of 1965, I saw this movie at a neighbor’s house one afternoon. Neither was the kind of show or movie my parents would have on TV at home.

The story opens with a boy, David MacLean, who uses an alarm clock to wake up at 4am to stargaze with his telescope through his bedroom window. The alarm wakes his parents too, who come to investigate. David says, but Dad! Orion is at zenith! And it won’t happen for another 6 years! He pronounces it OH-rion, not oh-RI-on, as astronomers do, and it’s impossible for Orion to appear at zenith (from this presumably middle America town), and if it did it wouldn’t happen only every six years. That’s Hollywood astronomy for you. (To be fair, there’s a small town in Illinois near where my parents grew up that pronounced Orion the same way.) His father uses the scope to look at Rigel (he pronounces it ‘regal’, not RYE-jel) and Bellatrix, and his mother turns on the ceiling light, which would ruin the boy’s night vision. Bad parents! (These are the kinds of things I remember after decades, more than the exact plot.)

Continue reading

Posted in Skiffy Flix | Comments Off on Skiffy Flix: Invaders from Mars

Can I? Must I?

  • RFK Jr. illustrates the hypocritical standards of conservative motivated thinking: “Can I believe it?” (one example is fine) vs. “Must I believe it?” (no amount of evidence will do);
  • David Brin ridicules NASA’s new plan to build a Lunar base;
  • Laura Miller on how tech barons like Elon Musk love science fiction but misunderstand it completely;
  • Short items: Trump only knows what his staff shows him; Veterans are horrified that Trump is treating the war like a joke; Beware anyone who claims God has told them what to do.
  • Radiohead: Exit Music (For a Film).
– – –

Psychological biases and fallacies are most clearly demonstrated by conservatives.

Washington Post, Editorial Board, 24 Mar 2026: RFK Jr.’s hypocritical quackery, subtitled “FDA scientists warn that some popular peptides are ineffective and potentially dangerous.”

Beginning with the point:

No amount of rigorous academic research or testing ever seems good enough to quell Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s doubts about vaccines. Yet for products he favors, anything goes.

Continue reading

Posted in Music, Psychology, Science, science fiction | Comments Off on Can I? Must I?

Bobby Azarian: THE ROMANCE OF REALITY

Subtitled: How the universe organizes itself to create life, consciousness, and cosmic complexity.
(BenBella Books, June 2022, 306pp, including 26pp of acknowledgements, notes, and index)

This is the third of three books I read this past January, all with vaguely similar themes, but each quite different in intent and conclusions from the others. I began this book back in September 2024, but then, with the coincidental appearance of Harari’s NEXUS in that same month, and its reference to Hidalgo’s WHY INFORMATION GROWS (from 2017 but on my shelves), I set Azarian aside to read Hidalgo, that September (posted about in November) and eventually the Harari, read last July (and not yet posted). Then this January returned to Azarian.

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Cosmology, Epistemology, Science | Comments Off on Bobby Azarian: THE ROMANCE OF REALITY

Again, Living in History

  • How America has become a dangerous nation;
  • How Christian Nationalists really do want to destroy their political enemies;
  • What that poll about MAGA supporting Trump 100% really means;
  • Brief items about the Supreme Court, a quote from Kurt Andersen about Trump’s stupidity, how Trump voted by mail even though he thinks mail-in voting is cheating, how Trump fans think he is right about everything, how ICE at airports is about owning the libs, and how Stephen Miller doesn’t want to educated undocumented children.
– – –

This isn’t about Trump or MAGA per se. I suspect most people don’t realize how we’re all witnessing historic shifts in American and world politics in the past few years. What many of us are not noticing will be written up in future history books.

NY Times, opinion by Carlos Lozada, today: America Has Become a Dangerous Nation [gift link]

We had a good run — some eight decades or so — but it is clear by now that the United States has ceased to be the leader of the free world. A successor for that post has not been named, and it appears unlikely that the European Union, or NATO, or whatever constitutes “the West” these days will promote from within. The job might even be eliminated, one more reduction in force courtesy of President Trump.

Rather than leading the free world, the United States is striding across the globe seemingly free of restraint, forethought or strategy, exerting its power because it can. In a matter of months, the Trump administration has captured Venezuela’s president and tossed him into jail in Brooklyn and has pummeled Iran’s theocratic leadership in a war that is ricocheting across the Middle East and upending the global economy; now the president says he will have “the honor of taking Cuba” next. Trump in his second term is like Michael Corleone in “The Godfather,” settling all the family business.

Very long piece; gift link provided. A couple more samples.

The United States wants the benefits of hegemony, but without accepting the responsibilities — ensuring collective security, promoting economic openness, nurturing vital alliances — that come with it. Trump doesn’t care to be a superpower; he just likes to wield superpowers. He wants to operate in the world constrained only by “my own morality” and “my own mind,” as he told The Times recently.

Lozada recalls a similar transition: “when we were shifting from a Cold War stalemate to a period of unrivaled U.S. primacy”.

In this light, Trump’s fixation on how America is getting “ripped off” by the rest of the world — whether through trade deficits, the loss of manufacturing plants, or insufficient military spending by NATO members — is not just the mantra of a real-estate guy obsessed with negotiating a better deal. It is also the resentment that dominant powers always have toward weaker ones, as Robert Gilpin, an international relations theorist, explained in “War and Change in World Politics,” his classic 1981 study of what makes hegemons come and go.

… For Trump, the problem with leading the free world is that the free world gets a free ride.

Skipping a lot. The essay concludes:

We are not entering a post-American world, one in which the United States recedes from the stage or stops wielding its military might. Far from it. But we may be entering a post-America world, one in which the meaning of America, the principles and values the country has long stood for — sometimes in reality, sometimes in aspiration — are fading. And the loss of that America may prove just as damaging, and far more lasting, than any harm Donald Trump’s excursions can inflict.

And this last thought certainly echoes my repeated comments that modern conservatives, especially MAGA, are less and less interested in the principles upon which the US was founded, than they are in protecting themselves and oppressing others.

\\\

For example. They really do want to destroy non-Christians. None of this Constitutional nonsense for them.

Right Wing Watch, Kyle Mantyla, 23 Mar 2026: By Any Means Necessary: Christian Nationalists Call For The Destruction Of Their Political Enemies

Last week, Christian nationalists Joshua Haymes and Brooks Potteiger urged their fellow right-wing Christians to pray “imprecatory psalms” against James Talarico, the Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate from Texas.

Talarico is a Presbyterian seminarian who has openly cited his Christian faith in support of his progressive political positions, much to the outrage right-wing Christian nationalists.

Potteiger, who was the pastor at the church attended by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth in Nashville, Tennessee, and will soon take over the Washington, DC church founded by Christian nationalist Doug Wilson, warned that Talarico is “a wolf” who is working to “distort what Christianity is in order to lead people away from Christ, toward the teaching of demons.”

As such, Potteiger and Haymes encouraged the use of “imprecatory psalms” against Talarico, which are prayers asking God to pour out his destruction upon one’s enemies.

“I pray that God kills him,” Haymes declared. “Ultimately, that means killing his heart and raising him up to new life in Christ … If it would not be within God’s will to do so, stop him by any means necessary.”

And that’s just the first example. Anything not part of their fundamentalist religious ideology is “evil” and must be destroyed. (And other religions, like Islam, think other things are evil and must be destroyed. This is why religion is dangerous.)

\\\

Asking the question yet again.

Washington Post, opinion by Jim Geraghty, today: There’s a reason for MAGA’s 100% support of Trump, subtitled “MAGA is standing by Trump and his war, with help from a polling fault.”

Conservative journalist Christopher Caldwell, hitherto a strong supporter of Donald Trump, is so deeply disappointed with the president’s decision to launch a war against the Iranian regime that he concluded in the Spectator: “The attack on Iran is so wildly inconsistent with the wishes of his own base, so diametrically opposed to their reading of the national interest, that it is likely to mark the end of Trumpism as a project.”

And so on. Let’s jump down and see the writer identifies a reason for that poll (even if that result wasn’t really 100%).

Well, here’s what he finds. Basically: those who disapproved of Trump way back when stopped calling themselves MAGA, or even Republican, and so aren’t being counted in polls like this.

If you’re a Trump supporter who is upset or wary about the Iran war or the resulting impact on gas prices … maybe you’re not as inclined to identify as MAGA to a pollster lately.

That’s why we shouldn’t expect to find many MAGA supporters expressing their opposition to Trump’s decisions on Iran or much else. When people in this demographic disagree strongly enough, eventually they just stop calling themselves MAGA.

There is no “Trumpism” without Trump, and thus it is difficult to buy into Caldwell’s argument that the president is betraying some clear preexisting set of values. To the extent “Trumpism” as a philosophy exists, a core tenet appears to be: “Always trust the guy in charge, because he knows what he is doing and is playing seven-level chess.”

\\\

Briefly noted.

Posted in Conservative Resistance, History, Human Nature, Politics, Religion | Comments Off on Again, Living in History