Steven Pinker, THE BETTER ANGELS OF OUR NATURE, post 6

Subtitled “Why Violence Has Declined”
(Viking, Oct. 2011, xxvii + 802pp, including 106pp of notes, references, and index.)

 

Summary:

Chapter 8 concerns five forces that drive violence: Predation, Dominance, Revenge, Sadism, and Ideology. Humans are not innately aggressive, except in certain circumstances that trigger violence. So a dark side does exist (the human mind is not a blank slate, as Pinker established in an earlier book), but it’s not an ever-present mounting urge. A Moralization Gap describes how humans, subject to self-serving biases, create competing narratives of perpetrator and victim, depending on point of view, and how perpetrators often feel themselves to be victim; i.e. there’s no such thing as pure evil. For each of the five forces, Pinker identifies what drives them, and social developments in the 20th century have ameliorated them.

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Steven Pinker | Leave a comment

The Fog of War, Hurricanes, and Cave Man Mentality

  • JD Vance’s caveman rage against a lesbian stepmom;
  • Heather Cox Richardson about Trump’s decline in mental acuity, and Sen. Mark Kelly on Pete Hegseth;
  • Zack Beauchamp on how Trump is advancing the white nationalist worldview;
  • Hegseth’s misunderstanding of the metaphor “fog of war”;
  • Briefly noted items about hurricanes, affordability, unlawful orders, the Ten Commandments, and that “Bible Says So” essay in Oklahoma.
  • Preisner: Red.
– – –

Given the weightiness of the discussions summarized in the Steven Pinker posts this week, I think it entirely justified to balance things out with the latest lunacies from the Trump administration for today’s regular post.

(Also, I’m again tweaking my format here for posted items, to see it if works.)

– – –

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, conservatives, Politics, Religion | Comments Off on The Fog of War, Hurricanes, and Cave Man Mentality

Steven Pinker, THE BETTER ANGELS OF OUR NATURE, post 5

Subtitled “Why Violence Has Declined”
(Viking, Oct. 2011, xxvii + 802pp, including 106pp of notes, references, and index.)

Summaries:

Chapter 6, “The New Peace,” consider three types of organized violence: among groups citing “ancient hatreds,” ethnic cleansing, and terrorism. These too are in decline. The first applies to the world outside the major powers. Genocide arises from stereotyping and Hobbes’ basic trio of motives for conflict: gain, fear, and deterrence. They are often led by Utopian ideologies that figure, for the perfect good, no sacrifice of people is too great: the Bible, Homer, the Puritans, Cromwell, Marx, Hitler. Genocides in the 20th century derived from just three men: Stalin, Hitler, and Mao. Terrorism is overblown; actual numbers are quite small. The point is panic, and most terrorist groups fail in their ostensible goals. We’ll never win the “war on terror” anymore than we’ll “rid the world of evil.”

There are four further threats: war with Islam (Muslims missed the Enlightenment somehow); nuclear terrorism (again, less likely than many think); Iran; and climate change.

Chapter 7 describes how violence has been reduced via the various “Rights Revolutions,” which parallel the humanitarian revolution of two centuries earlier. These include civil rights and the decline of lynching and racial pogroms; women’s rights and the decline of rape and battering; children’s rights and the decline of infanticide, spanking, etc.; gay rights and the decriminalization of homosexuality; animal rights and the decline of cruelty to animals. This chapter cites a great many familiar events from the past 50 years, weaving them into cohesive patterns. They show that a moral way of life often requires a rejection of instinct, culture, religion, and standard practice, replaced by an ethics of empathy and reason. Progress results in today’s conservatives being more liberal than yesterday’s liberals. What brought them all about? Mobility of ideas and people, and the explosion of book publishing, which debunked ignorance and superstition, and resulted in a sort of intellectual agility that enables people to step outside the parochial constraints of their own birth and station.

Posts on this book: This page with quotes at the bottom; Post 1; Post 2; Post 3; Post 4; Post 5; Post 6; Post 7

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Steven Pinker | Comments Off on Steven Pinker, THE BETTER ANGELS OF OUR NATURE, post 5

The Human Struggle to Overcome Tribalism and Superstition

  • Revisiting Steven Pinker, and how the human race has struggled to escape tribalism and superstition (and violence) by way of progressive policies that conservatives to this day still resist;
  • Adam Lee on the continued secularization of American society;
  • How Christianity is struggling with empathy;
  • And how Trump demonizes anyone he thinks is not compatible with his idea of “Western Civilization”;
  • And how loyalty trumps everything else, in the matter of Pete Hegseth.
– – –

This week I’m revisiting Steven Pinker’s 2011 book THE BETTER ANGELS OF OUR NATURES, in part to catch up posting here notes on substantial books I’ve but not yet posted about, and in part to revisit one of the central books that has formed my worldview. I go on and on about the spectrum of human nature and the endpoints of conservativism and progressivism. At the extremes, cave-man tribalism, vs. a sort of science-fictional utopianism. The history of the human race has been a struggle to break away from the mentality of ancient humanity and find better goals and meanings for life than stultifying tradition and inter-tribal animus.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Human Struggle to Overcome Tribalism and Superstition

Steven Pinker, THE BETTER ANGELS OF OUR NATURE, post 4

Subtitled “Why Violence Has Declined”
(Viking, Oct. 2011, xxvii + 802pp, including 106pp of notes, references, and index.)

Here, a full eight years after I began, I’ll finish posting my outline and notes on Steven Pinker’s 2011 book. This is not, I stress again, a dry treatise about rates of violence over the centuries, but rather virtually a history of the human race, considering how the forces that have changed it have brought about a more peaceful and enlightened world. (And his almost-as-substantial follow-up book, ENLIGHTENMENT NOW, 2018, extends this book’s case.)

If there’s a grand theme of the book I can boil down into one sentence, it’s not about violence per se, it’s about how forces we would now call progressive have, throughout history, improved the human condition. And my observation: that these are forces that many conservatives to this day resist.

Posts on this book: This page with quotes at the bottom; Post 1; Post 2; Post 3; Post 4; Post 5; Post 6; Post 7

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Social Progress, Steven Pinker | Comments Off on Steven Pinker, THE BETTER ANGELS OF OUR NATURE, post 4

The Limitations of Human Cognition

  • Anti-Vaxxers and how it’s not about evidence;
  • Paul Krugman on Trump’s incoherent war on drugs;
  • Short takes on how Trump is elevating Sen. Mark Kelly; how Maga’s idea of Christianity implies a “cold-hearted Jesus”; and why a Bible-based essay on psychology was given a failing grade;
  • Connie Willis’ Trump Dementia Watch today.
– – –

Once again, I am thinking that the limits of cognitive ability, combined with the inclinations toward tribalism and intuitive superstition, may cap the progress of the human race.

NY Times, Rachael Bedard, 25 Nov 2025 (but in yesterday’s paper, 30 Nov): I Went to an Anti-Vaccine Conference. Medicine Is in Trouble.

It’s never about debating evidence. It’s about stories and belonging to a tribe. The writer seems to conclude that there’s no way to overcome this. Concluding,
Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Human Nature, Psychology | Comments Off on The Limitations of Human Cognition

Because It’s There, and Because We Can

Big Think, Ethan Siegel, 28 Nov 2025: Ask Ethan: What’s the point of exploring the Universe?, subtitled “There are so many problems, all across planet Earth, that harm and threaten humanity. Why invest in researching the Universe?”

(My first comment, something of an aside: The photo shows the so-called “Pillars of Creation” nebula first photographed in 1995, and more recently by the James Webb Space Telescope in mid-infrared and in near-infrared, left and right, shown here. I’ve always been slightly annoyed by the nomenclature “pillars” because they only way the term can apply is because the photo has been turned to make those nebular extensions seem to go upward. It’s an example of humans imposing our own biases on the universe at large. Even the ‘north’ indicator is arbitrary, since the way we view maps and the globe could just as well been the other way around.)
Continue reading

Posted in Astronomy, Conservative Resistance, Cosmology, Science | Comments Off on Because It’s There, and Because We Can

Incoherence

  • Trump presumes to close Venezuelan airspace, as part of his campaign against drug smugglers, while pardoning a former Honduran president sentenced to prison for drug smuggling;
  • About the new Connie Willis Daily website;
  • The global decline in murder;
  • Short takes on COVID vaccine deaths, Hitler Youth reborn, and Trump’s continued innumeracy.
– – –

By what possible authority can Trump say this and expect it to happen? Oh, I forgot, he thinks he’s a king.

NY Times, 29 Nov 2025: Trump Declares Venezuelan Airspace Closed, subtitled “President Trump said days earlier that the United States could ‘very soon’ expand its campaign of killing people at sea suspected of drug trafficking to attacking Venezuelan territory.”

Continue reading

Posted in Lunacy, Politics | Comments Off on Incoherence

Thanksgiving

  • Thanksgiving with an Asian family;
  • A Facebook graphic about hospitals and who gets the money;
  • Carl Sagan on Who Speaks for Earth?
  • Recalling quotes by E.O. Wilson and Robert A. Heinlein;
  • Don D’Ammassa on humanity’s death spiral;
  • NYT articles on Russia’s Nazi narrative about Ukraine, and how the UK public thinks immigration is up even as it’s down.
– – –

Another family get-together yesterday evening of course, after cooking and prepping until late afternoon. (Curious thing: the American style I grew up with would hold holiday dinners, on Thanksgiving and Christmas Day, at mid-afternoon, 2pm or 3pm. The Chinese/Asian extended families of my partners sit down to dinner at 5pm.) And we bought a Christmas tree today.

This year I am thankful that Trump and MAGA have not *quite* destroyed everything that America has been aspiring to for two and half centuries. And I’m grateful that, after two and a half years of intermittent work, my essay for Gary Westfahl has finally been published.

Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Narrative, Personal history, Politics | Comments Off on Thanksgiving

False Equivalences

  • Frank Bruni on people who excuse Trump’s outrageous behavior for the relatively minor sins of the previous administration, unable to tell the difference in magnitude;
  • Briefly noted items about Mark Kelly and Benedict Arnold; NYT on Trump’s fatigue and Trump’s resultant outrage; Republicans getting rid of auto safety features; Trump wants money so he can get into heaven; Liberty Counsel’s boycott list and what it means; how Trump is what the founders were fighting against; and how new US rules subvert the idea of human rights.
– – –

This is about motivated thinking, whataboutism, projection, and insensitivity to scale (i.e. black-and-white-ism). About seeing the speck in your brother’s eye…

NY Times, opinion by Frank Bruni, 24 Nov 2025: The Outrageous False Equivalences That Prop Up President Trump (gift link)
Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Human Nature, Lunacy, Politics, Psychology | Comments Off on False Equivalences