Conservative Reality, and Reality

  • The state of the American economy, vs. conservative dystopian fantasies;
  • How conservatives whitewash the events of January 6th, 2021;
  • How Meta is obeying in advance by removing fact-checkers, and wondering why conservatives object to fact-checkers (where the answer is obvious);
  • How the conservative notion of serving a higher cause excuses, in their minds, blatant lying, as with Mike Johnson’s recitation of a fake “Jefferson prayer”.
– – –

 

The question keeps coming up, does it matter if human perceptions have little do with reality? Is there a problem if humans live by made-up stories even when they’re obviously untrue? At what point does this behavior so collide with reality that it will cause real harm?

First of all, an example, yet again, of how the economy that Biden is leaving behind is not as bad as most conservative voters think. They are either being disingenuous, or short-sighted. From yesterday’s print edition.

NY Times, news analysis by Peter Baker, 5 Jan 2025: Trump Sees the U.S. as a ‘Disaster.’ The Numbers Tell a Different Story., subtitled “President Biden is bequeathing his successor a nation that by many measures is in good shape, even if voters remain unconvinced.” [gift link]

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, conservatives, Narrative, Politics | Comments Off on Conservative Reality, and Reality

George Lakoff, THE POLITICAL MIND

Subtitled “Why You Can’t Understand 21st-Century American Politics with an 18th-Century Brain”
(Viking, June 2008, 292pp, including 20pp of acknowledgements, notes, and index.)

Note that the paperback edition from 2009 changed the subtitle to “A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to Your Brain and Its Politics”

This is a fascinating book on two opposite counts. Lakoff is a professor at UC Berkeley, and I became aware of him through newspaper columns and Facebook posts and mentions of him by David Brin. I bought this 2008 book belatedly in 2019 from a 3rd-party dealer, via Amazon, for $10(!), and have now gotten around to reading it.

Briefly, the two opposite counts: his take is about politics, from the perspective of what we’ve learned about the brain [mind] since the 18th century, and his understandings are precisely those gathered from studies of the mind, principally that humans don’t think rationally, as everyone but especially the economists used to think. This is not a new discovery, but what’s new here is how Lakoff applies this to modern politics. Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Evolution, Human Nature, MInd, Politics | Comments Off on George Lakoff, THE POLITICAL MIND

Faith, Consolation, Reality

A couple weeks ago I noted, without any kind of deep analysis, a David Brooks essay about his experience of faith, and how it involved random emotional feelings of transcendence and nothing about perceiving the actual nature of reality.

OnlySky, Bruce Ledewitz, 3 Jan 2025: What David Brooks’s search for God can teach secularists, subtitled “Brooks’s essay is the kind that often exasperates nonbelievers. But is there something of value to secular civilization in his God-optional conclusions?”

Does he mean, is there some kind of rhetorical ploy that seculars can use to similarly appeal to peoples’ subjective senses of awe and meaning?

Continue reading

Posted in Evolution, Religion | Comments Off on Faith, Consolation, Reality

Knee-Jerk Conservative Reactions

  • Conservatives react to the incidents this past week in New Orleans and Las Vegas by blaming their favorite bogeymen. Immigrants! Diversity initiatives! Without evidence, or rationale.
  • As conservatives reject reality, reality-based scientists are rejecting the coming conservative administration, by moving overseas.
——

 

All right, let’s see what the conservative loonies are up to this week. Conservatives just can’t help themselves. Whatever happens in the world — this past week, an ISIS-inspired truck driver in New Orleans, and a Cybertruck driver in Las Vegas — they’re sure their favorite bogeymen are to blame. (Without evidence.) Immigrants! Diversity initiatives! These people are motivated by mindless fear.

Salon, Amanda Marcotte, 3 Jan 2025: New year, same Trump: MAGA pounces on New Orleans tragedy to spread disinformation, subtitled “The president-elect’s barrage of lies encourages his followers to reject reality even harder”

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Human Nature, Politics | Comments Off on Knee-Jerk Conservative Reactions

What Conservatives Want to Conserve

Another passage from Lakoff, with my interpolations. From page 68:

In its moral basis and its content, conservatism is centered on the politics of authority, obedience, and discipline. This content is profoundly antidemocratic, whereas our country was founded on opposition to authoritarianism. Yet conservatism also lays exclusive claim to patriotism. There is a contradiction here. How do conservatives get around it?

The answer can be found in the word “conservatism” itself. Those who call themselves by that label typically say they are in favor of conserving the best of past traditions. —

We could stop right there. Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, conservatives | Comments Off on What Conservatives Want to Conserve

Remembering Y2k; a Political Commentator admits he was wrong; Fallibilism; Reading Lakoff

Back to interesting ideas.

Heather Cox Richardson recalls Y2K, 25 years ago on January 1st, and how since the problem was fixed (by the scientists and tech guys) some people felt the problem had never been real. As always, she provides straightforward discussion of the background and circumstances, including the religious doomsayers who thought — as they did the previous millennium — that the world was about to end. Key point:

Heather Cox Richardson: January 1, 2025

Crises get a lot of attention, but the quiet work of fixing them gets less. Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Human Nature, Politics, Technology | Comments Off on Remembering Y2k; a Political Commentator admits he was wrong; Fallibilism; Reading Lakoff

Consolidations and Resolutions

More discussion today of what I got done in 2024, and about my ongoing project that will extend into 2025. This is to start consolidating all my writing ideas from the past decade into some overall framework. I’ve been doing that in one way or another in various files for a decade now. More seriously, I began that in a couple ways in 2024.

First, the essay I wrote for Gary Westfahl in 2023, Continue reading

Posted in Personal history, The Book | Comments Off on Consolidations and Resolutions

End of Year 2024

I don’t do this every year, but today I’m inclined to write about what’s gone on this past year, what if anything I’ve “accomplished,” and what if any “progress” I’ve made toward long-term goals.

About books read, settling Larry’s estate, current health and projects in work, music listened to, Y’s trip to China, and our two new cats.

First, a metric I’ve tracked for decades: how many books did I read this year? Continue reading

Posted in Personal history | Comments Off on End of Year 2024

Why People Believe True Things

  • A deep inspection of an essay linked by David Brooks in his essay linked yesterday, much aligned with my current themes, with a key takeaway about the idea of “misinformation”;
  • And links to two other pieces I’ll explore later.
——

Let’s look at this piece directly.

Dan Williams, 28 Jul 2024: Why do people believe true things?, subtitled “Ignorance and misperceptions are not puzzling. The challenge is to explain why some people see reality accurately.”

Continue reading

Posted in Psychology | Comments Off on Why People Believe True Things

End of Year Summaries

  • David Brooks’ favorite essays include one about how Trump’s people have no clue about how to fix complex problems, and one about why people believe *true* things;
  • Two pieces from The Atlantic about 77 facts from 2024, and important breakthroughs in 2024;
  • And Heather Cox Richardson’s take on the civil war among MAGA Republicans.
– – –

NY Times, Opinion by David Brooks, 26 Dec 2024: The Sidney Awards

These are “awards” that Brooks personally announces for his favorite essays of the past year, from “small and medium-size publications,” i.e. avoiding the big papers and magazines. I’m noting this to note a couple of his selections that appeal to me and my big themes. First this:

Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Politics, Science, Social Progress, Technology | Comments Off on End of Year Summaries