Film Reviews: La La Land and Hidden Figures

A couple belated capsule film reviews, from the holiday week — La La Land and Hidden Figures.

I loved La La Land, for its charming cheerful songs, its tour of LA locations — especially Griffith Park, that freeway ramp along the I-110, and that hillside road overlooking the valley lined with valet parked cars, where the first dance between Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone takes place — but especially for the alternate history time-loop that appears at a key point in the film. The theme of sacrificing for your dream is hardly unfamiliar, as is the self-reflective idea that maybe you just aren’t good enough to succeed (I think everyone feels that to some degree; it’s more about how long you keep trying), but that those ideas might undermine the film’s easy romance gives the film a slight edge.

We also saw that week Hidden Figures, the movie set in the early 1960s about several black women who played key roles in the early space program, working for NASA in an age when not only women, but certainly ‘colored’ people, were mostly unseen and disregarded by the white male wonks in central control. This is of the Hollywood genre that reflects on history through the filter of contemporary values, in such a blatant way that you can’t quite trust its retelling of history; and its three parallel narratives are obvious and too often played for laughs (as when Taraji P. Henson’s character has to repeatedly run to another building, 1/4 mile away, with the only available ‘colored’ restroom). At the same time, it’s great to see a film recalling our nation’s glory days, when we accomplished great things– launching men into space, later reaching the moon. (Despite my reservations — worth seeing.)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3783958/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4846340/

Posted in Films | Comments Off on Film Reviews: La La Land and Hidden Figures

Some Links from Facebook: Asimov; California; Google Sky; Haidt

I keep ‘saving’ links or posts on Facebook that I don’t get around to right away, to read or post. Here are a few from the dozen I’ve saved in the past month or so.

NPR: Adopting a Sci-Fi Way of Thinking About the Future.

Posted on January 2nd, on what has apparently become National Science Fiction Day as it correponds with Isaac Asimov’s birthday. The piece quotes a key excerpt from a 1978 Asimov essay:

No sensible decision can be made any longer without taking into account not only the world as it is, but the world as it will be — and naturally this means that there must be an accurate perception of the world as it will be. This, in turn, means that our statesmen, our businessmen, our Everyman, must take on a science fictional way of thinking, whether he likes it or not or even whether he knows it or not. Only so can the deadly problems of today be solved.

\\

On California, perhaps a refuge from Trumplandia, on Tim Rutten’s site: The Right’s Hatred of California Is Really Fear of a Future that Already Is Working.

What’s really at work in the right-wing’s demonization of California is not really loyalty to Trumpism or traditionalist devotion to the Electoral College. It’s fear of the future. When Trump vowed to “make America great again” the right read his rhetoric as a promise to take us back in time—to the years when white men went off to work and white women stayed home with the kids and minority races were just that, minorities who kept to themselves.

California, by contrast, already is what more of America will look like in the years to come. No single race is in the majority or enjoys a lock on political or economic power. Seventeen percent of all Americans live in California and 38% of them are non-Hispanic whites, 38.8% are Latinos, 14.7% are Asians, 6.5% are African American, 1.7% are Native Americans—numerically, the country’s largest concentration of indigenous people—and 3.8% describe themselves as of mixed race. More Californians—43%–speak a language other than English in their homes, though it will confound Trump supporters to know that immigration from Mexico slowed long ago and the majority of new immigrants come from Asia, mainly China.

And despite conversative fears of how the country is changing, it hasn’t harmed California:

If the Golden State were an independent country, according to the most recent World Bank ratings, it would have the globe’s sixth largest economy.

So there.

\\

Via David Brin: Google Sky

\\

Wall Street Journal: Jonathan Haidt (one of my favorite authors, based on the one book of his I’ve read) and Ravi Iyer on How to Get Beyond Our Tribal Politics. Have not read this, but I presume in condenses the lessons of his singular book.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Some Links from Facebook: Asimov; California; Google Sky; Haidt

Index to Reviews

I’ve built a page here for reviews, books and films, that I’ve posted here since mid-2013, when the “Views from..” blog was established, succeeding the earlier Locus Online editorial blog. The link is in the header above. I’ll go through the earlier blog eventually, though I don’t think there are nearly so many substantial reviews there. Also, I occasionally post film reviews on Facebook that aren’t always copied here; I’ll track those down too.

I might also add, for anyone who cares, that I read many more books than ever get written up here. I almost always take notes as I read, and type them up into a Word file (I’ve been doing this for 20 years), but I less often go the next step and condense my notes into any sort of posted review. (At the moment, I do intend a post or two about Robert Silverberg’s short fiction through 1975, which I read late last year, and which covered many books; and James Gleick’s recent nonfiction Time Travel, which I finished last week; and Hugo Gernsback’s notorious ‘classic’ SF novel Ralph 124C 41+, which I finished yesterday.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Index to Reviews

Blog ToC Updated

I spent a couple three hours this afternoon — as a storm moved in over the Bay Area — compiling my own Table of Contents to this blog, and updating that page. I thought I had not posted so much this past year, compared to earlier years, but that turns out only to be true through mid-year, when I got distracted from blogging, and reading, for several months by those video games The Witness and Obduction.

Everything on this blog is a draft for my imagined book — about reality v fantasy, narrative v reality, the human perception of the world v its reality, and how science fiction informs and explores that dissonance.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Blog ToC Updated

Christianity and the Sunk Cost fallacy

In the Christmas Day issue of the New York Times, columnist Nicholas Kristof has a chat with the evangelist Christian pastor and author Timothy Keller, asking Am I a Christian, Pastor Timothy Keller?.

Kristof admires the teachings of Jesus but is skeptical about the literal truth of the virgin birth, and resurrection, and so on. Does that mean he’s not really a Christian? Keller takes a hard line.

The Christian Church is pretty much inexplicable if we don’t believe in a physical resurrection.

Having read for myself how scant the Biblical ‘evidence’ is for a physical resurrection (in my commentaries on books of the New Testament, in 2016 on this blog), this strikes me both as special pleading, and an illustration of the Sunk cost fallacy. As I discussed in one of my earlier posts, the claims about the resurrection (and the virginity of Mary) are so scant and inconsistent, they would not persuade anyone who did not already have a deep, deep commitment to the Christian church — as much of Western society has had for two millennia now. To evaluate that evidence by any contemporary standard and draw the appropriate conclusion would require abandoning the vast investment that society has already been made — all those traditions, all those cathedrals. Unthinkable. So most people don’t think about it. Or obfuscate.

In the letters section a few days later, the writer John Teehan calls out the dangerous implications of such hard-line thinking, in an even broader context.

Mr. Kristof gets to the moral core of the problem with this evangelical theology: It condemns billions of non-Christians to eternal damnation for the simple fact of being non-Christian. The Rev. Timothy Keller’s response is clear: Yes, only those who believe in Jesus can be saved.

This belief is a pure distillation of one of the most dangerous elements of human psychology: the moral bias toward the in-group and against the “other.” This moral tribalism is not restricted to religion (see contemporary politics) but when couched in religious language becomes exceptionally potent.

I think I shall have to read Mr. Teehan’s book.

Posted in Bible, MInd, Religion | Comments Off on Christianity and the Sunk Cost fallacy

An Intelligent Design Video

Decent video that debunks “intelligent design”, triggered off Michael Behe’s claims of irreducible complexity and the human eye, showing evidence of partial eye evolution in other species.

And it pinpoints the human psychological issue– the “personal incredulity” fallacy, i.e., claiming that that you can’t possibly imagine how something could have happened naturally means God, therefore Jesus, therefore your specific faith.

What the video doesn’t do is point out the obvious fact that human eyes *aren’t* perfect, else why do so many of us need eyeglasses? Surely a truly *intelligent* designer could have done better.

(I’m way behind compiled interesting links, and for now I’ll try just posted them as I see them, and catch up eventually.)

Posted in Evolution | Comments Off on An Intelligent Design Video

George Michael

I did a Facebook post about my favorite George Michael songs — typically for me, the introspective ballads.

My favorite George Michael song– Mother’s Pride.

It’s only about the song; I’ve never seen the video until just now.

“And all the husbands, all the sons, all the lovers gone
They make no difference
No difference in the end
Still hear the woman say your daddy died a hero
In the name of god and man”

\\

Or perhaps this one, a later song very much in the mode of “Jesus to a Child” — “You Have Been Loved”.

“Take care my love, she said
You have been loved”

Reflecting on this, there are later lines that resonate, that speak to my own life:

“Well I’ve no daughters, I’ve no sons
Guess I’m the only one
Living in my life”

The swell and descent of the melody on that last line is heart-crushing.

Posted in Music | Comments Off on George Michael

Rereading Robert Silverberg, 1

I am fortunate that, in my “retirement” (from my day job, that is; I still keep my hand in posting on Locus Online once a day, and maintaining sfadb.com), I have the luxury to sit in my armchair each weekday and do what I always fantasized I might do in my retirement: read my library. Reread my favorite authors, catch up on authors I didn’t get to when their books came out, explore new interests, follow happenchance and synchronicity. I think it’s true that every reader acquires many more books than they ever have time to read, and I’m no exception, but currently I’m in the position to take advantage of the acquisitiveness of my earlier self. Now as I think about what I’d like to read, I am frequently surprised to check my shelves and discover, yes I do have that book!

And if I think of something I don’t find on my shelves — these days anything can be found on the internet. I use AbeBooks, mostly. Yes, it’s sad that the used bookshops I used to explore in the ’70s and ’80s are mostly gone. As in new bookstores, you discover things you weren’t necessarily looking for, wandering through dusty used books shops. Yes, I have plenty of books on my own shelves to keep me busy for years…and frankly, when I do wander through the several used book shops here in the Bay Area (more of them seem to have survived than those in SoCal), it’s rare that I find anything remarkable. My own collection, whether of SF, or books on cosmology and evolution, or religious studies, is better than those at any one of those….

So, in my retirement, these past couple years, I have begun revisiting my favorite science fiction authors, on my blog with posts about Clarke, and Asimov, and Heinlein. Not just to wallow in nostalgia, but to rethink and reconsider these authors in terms of my own “provisional conclusions”, which is to say, to reflect on how science fiction anticipated or explored ideas now being revealed by the latest results and thinking in science and human psychology. I find myself not trusting my reactions to books or stories of even three or four years ago, and needing to reread or revisit foundational texts.

Robert Silverberg played a significant role in my own growth as a reader and as an adult. (Some of this will be recounted in my “ways to buy a book” posts, not yet finished.) Asimov and Bradbury and Clarke and Heinlein were in some sense introductory SF/F authors, to me. But early in this history, long before I’d finished finding all the books by those authors, I happened to pick up a Silverberg collection — it was DIMENSION THIRTEEN — in 1969, off a newsrack in a small-town market, and liking it bought further Silverberg collections, and novels, as I found them, over the next few years. Silverberg was very prolific in those days, with roughly one or two story collections a year, and two or three novels every year (novels were much shorter in those days — typically about 200 pages each). Silverberg was, in two essential ways, far more mature than the ABCH starters: his prose was rich and imaginative in ways those earlier authors’ prose wasn’t; and Silverberg addressed adult themes, e.g. sex and drugs, in a way none of those earlier authors had done…

So now, beginning this past October, I’m rereading the two or three dozen collections of Robert Silverberg stories. I started, just before our October cruise, with BORN WITH THE DEAD, containing the title story, one of Silverberg’s pinnacle stories. Returning from the cruise, at the very end of October, I’ve gone back to revisit (or in a few cases visit for the first time), all the collections, beginning with a reread of DIMENSION THIRTEEN, and then returning to his very first, NEXT STOP THE STARS first published in 1962, and proceeding in chronological order, with GODLING, GO HOME!, TO WORLDS BEYOND, and so on.

Along the way I am acquiring, again through Abebooks, the nine-volume COLLECTED STORIES published over the past decade or so by Subterranean Press. I’d bought the first volume when it came out, but neglected later volumes on the grounds that I already had all the stories in those books, in all the earlier collections by Silverberg I’d acquired over the decades. With my new ambition of revisiting the entirety of Silverberg’s short work (novels will require a separate, likely somewhat limited, ambition), I realized, for one, that many of the stories he published in the 1990s and 2000s had not been collected anywhere else — and two, the detailed introductions to each story, throughout the entire series, was worth the price of acquiring the entire Subterranean set. (As of this writing, I have volumes 7, 8, and 9, and volumes 1 through 4, with the remaining two on order.)

And as of this writing, I’ve finished reading all the collections published up until 1975, i.e. the essential collections UNFAMILIAR TERRITORY, CAPRICORN GAMES, and (read earlier) BORN WITH THE DEAD, and along the way COLLECTED STORIES v4. Given imminent holiday priorities, I’ll not resume, with RS’s 1980s stories following his famous late ’70s ‘retirement’, until sometime in January.

The very short take on the significance of Silverberg’s short fiction is that it reflects, over the decades, in significant ways, the history of science fiction. Its ups, and downs, and refuge into corners; the literary heights it achieved for a while, the reconnaissance it sought as SF became pop culture. Further posts in the series will focus on how various ‘phases’ of Silverberg’s career illustrate this trajectory.

Posted in science fiction, Silverberg | Comments Off on Rereading Robert Silverberg, 1

Our New Post-Fact World

Again, I’m having trouble getting back up to speed on this blog, partly a matter of resuming a routine that was interrupted by our big European trip in October, but mostly a matter of the election results and the bizarre, post-factual world we now seem to be living in. It is hard to know where to start. I’ve been collecting links, and I’ll start going through them with comments.

For the moment, though, I have a thought about the “post-fact” existence that Trump and has team seem to be enforcing on the country — that whatever they say might be so, that claims from scientists and other experts can be dismissed, that anything anyone think *might* be true has equal claim to serious consideration. Pizzagate, and so on — a sizeable percentage of Trump supporters apparently really do believe that Hillary Clinton ran a child-sex ring out of pizza parlor, a claim the evidence shows was entirely *made up* by some immoral provocateur. That’s a trivial example. More serious are those who dismiss climate change — the best current example of motivated thinking, since those who dismiss it are invariably either supporters of the current energy industry relying on fossil fuels, or people relying on ‘common sense’ anti-intellectual rejection of authority and expertise.

It’s worth wondering, which I haven’t seen anyone do exactly, to what extent any of it *matters*. Immediately the pizzagate example shows how a person alarmed by that fake story might take the law into his own hands and come close to committing violence on others. Worse, imaginary, examples, might be the mobs shouting “lock her up” based on Trump’s repeated innuendo about a case that repeated (Republican) congressional investigations showed did not implicate Hillary — mobs don’t care, and Trump won through appeal to mobs.

And of course the existential threat example is Trump’s, and his selected cabinet’s, rejection of climate science, and presumably the subsequent inaction on the part of the US for some years to ameliorate that problem. As I’ve said before in this blog, I predict the climate change will in fact have devastating consequences, likely by the end of the 21st century, and it will take those consequences to appear before any of the deniers admit they might have been wrong, 50 years after they might have done something about it. (More likely, they will rationalize events and excuse themselves.)

So there are circumstances where denial of reality has grave consequences.

But my thought on this general topic is that most of humanity forever lives in a fact-denial reality — and it doesn’t matter. Most people claim supernatural religious beliefs, many many mutually inconsistent ones around the world over time, and nevertheless carry on their lives and live within societies that function, more or less, with a variety of such beliefs. Many people reject evolution, or cosmology, and nevertheless live out functional, even useful, lives. Human perception of reality is not accurate; humans live according to the parameters of what it takes to survive and reproduce as a human, which is quite different from understanding the real world.

This is one of my main themes, of course, and I will also note how concepts such as confirmation bias and motivated reasoning are increasingly becoming part of the common parlance of national conversation.

The difference now, now that humanity is filling up the planet and affecting its climate and bringing about the extinction of a large number of species — c.f. Elizabeth Kolbert’s THE SIXTH EXTINCTION — is that denial of reality may have real consequences within a human generation or two, that would in fact threaten our own species. (Not the planet. “The planet cleanses itself.”)

Links and comments soon.

Posted in Politics, Provisional Conclusions | Comments Off on Our New Post-Fact World

The Election

I have a huge backlog of links to link and comment upon, considering I haven’t done so in over a month, but for tonight I will confine myself to the two best essay reactions to the election of Donald Trump [cognitive dissonance–can those words be true??] that I saw today.

David Remnick of The New Yorker: An American Tragedy:

The election of Donald Trump to the Presidency is nothing less than a tragedy for the American republic, a tragedy for the Constitution, and a triumph for the forces, at home and abroad, of nativism, authoritarianism, misogyny, and racism. Trump’s shocking victory, his ascension to the Presidency, is a sickening event in the history of the United States and liberal democracy. On January 20, 2017, we will bid farewell to the first African-American President—a man of integrity, dignity, and generous spirit—and witness the inauguration of a con who did little to spurn endorsement by forces of xenophobia and white supremacy. It is impossible to react to this moment with anything less than revulsion and profound anxiety.

And Paul Krugman in New York Times: Paul Krugman: Our Unknown Country:

There turn out to be a huge number of people — white people, living mainly in rural areas — who don’t share at all our idea of what America is about. For them, it is about blood and soil, about traditional patriarchy and racial hierarchy. And there were many other people who might not share those anti-democratic values, but who nonetheless were willing to vote for anyone bearing the Republican label.

I don’t know how we go forward from here. Is America a failed state and society? It looks truly possible. I guess we have to pick ourselves up and try to find a way forward, but this has been a night of terrible revelations, and I don’t think it’s self-indulgent to feel quite a lot of despair.

More later as I continue to process this.

Posted in Politics | Comments Off on The Election