Oliver Sacks, THE MAN WHO MISTOOK HIS WIFE FOR A HAT

Like the Pinker and Wilson volumes I’ve covered here recently, this is another classic nonfiction book, one I first read years ago without taking notes (maybe before I began taking notes on my reading). So I skimmed through it again last week to capture essential points. This won’t be a detailed summary/review, like I did for those other two.

Subtitled: “and Other Clinical Tales.” (First published 1985 by Summit Books. Edition shown is trade paperback reprint, Perennial Library, 1987. x + 243pp, including 10pp chapter-by-chapter bibliographic notes.)

Sacks, who died in 2015, was a clinical neurologist who specialized in neurological disorders. He was famous for this book, with its intriguing title, and for previous book Awakenings, which was made into a movie in 1990 starring Robin Williams and Robert DeNiro. He wrote numerous other books too, including one about music. (Also, he was a burly guy with a huge beard, a bodybuilder, and gay, though he was celibate for 40 years.)

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, MInd, Psychology, science fiction | Comments Off on Oliver Sacks, THE MAN WHO MISTOOK HIS WIFE FOR A HAT

How Humans Live by Stories, and Myths

  • A NYT essay that wonders if, given how political persuasions are aligned with community, we actually ever think for ourselves;
  • An example from the fringe about a Republican who wants to outlaw “chemtrails”;
  • A review of a book about the idea of finding a new mythology for the United States;
  • And mention of a forthcoming book by Fareed Zakaria about progress and backlash.

*

The point here is valid, sorta, but I think he over-simplifies.

NY Times, guest essay by Neil Gross, 24 Mar 2024: When It Comes to Politics, Are Any of Us Really Thinking for Ourselves?

Continue reading

Posted in Culture, History, Narrative, Psychology | Comments Off on How Humans Live by Stories, and Myths

An Anthropologist from Mars Considers the Evidence

  • What would a hypothetical anthropologist from another planet conclude about humanity from these several items today?
  • Charlie Kirk insists Christians must vote Republican; a former ESPN anchor thinks Satan knocked out her teeth; Charlie Kirk thinks Haiti is infested with demonic voodoo that turns people into cats;
  • Amanda Marcotte on how evangelicals like raunch, for themselves, but not sex, for others;
  • PolitiFact supports the claim that 96% of job growth since 1989 has been under Democratic presidents;
  • Paul Krugman on politics in Ohio: how Trump’s trade war didn’t benefit them, while Biden’s policies have.
  • And considering how the visiting anthropologist would rate human intelligence.

What conclusions would be drawn from the following news items?

Hemant Mehta, Friendly Atheist, 22 Mar 2024: Charlie Kirk echoes thoughtless claim that you can’t “be a Christian and vote Democrat”, subtitled “Who needs theology when you have Trump?”

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, conservatives, Economics, Lunacy | Comments Off on An Anthropologist from Mars Considers the Evidence

Putting Things Into Perspective: Science, Expertise, Liberalism

Items today are follow-ups to items from the past couple days, it turns out.

  • Ethan Siegel at Big Think puts that dark matter claim into the perspective of how science works;
  • Tom Nichols’ update of The Death of Expertise aligns with yesterday’s piece about America’s decline;
  • A new book by Fareed Zakaria attempts to explain the backlash to the liberal revolution of the past three decades.

First of all, a very thorough response to that study that claimed to disprove the idea of dark matter, which I last wrote about here.

Big Think, Ethan Siegel, 22 Mar 2024: Ask Ethan: Has a new study disproven dark matter and dark energy?, subtitled “There are a wide variety of theoretical studies that call our standard model of cosmology into question. Here’s what they really mean.”

Continue reading

Posted in Astronomy, Science, science fiction | Comments Off on Putting Things Into Perspective: Science, Expertise, Liberalism

Exceptionalism, and Science Fiction

  • A screed by Brian Karem at Salon about how “America has lost its collective mind”;
  • How ideas of American exceptionalism have been reflected in 20th century science fiction;
  • Examples about “don’t say gay” laws; Trump’s fascist rhetoric; Trump’s dementia; how Trump fans will take his “bloodbath” comment literally; a North Carolina politician who calls for the public executions of Biden and Obama; and Charlie Kirk promising to fight if the election doesn’t go his way.

No doubt America is exceptional, in the size of its defense budget at least. (And, actually, in the number of its Nobel-Prize winning scientists, too.) But the word ‘exceptional’ has other connotations…

*

About this piece, I wonder, in what sense are all Americans to blame? But it does suggest how this applies to science fiction.

Salon, Brian Karem, 21 Mar 2024: We have met the enemy and he is us, subtitled “And with no sense of humor, the joke is on us”

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, conservatives, Politics, science fiction | Comments Off on Exceptionalism, and Science Fiction

That Potential Revolutionary Scientific Reinterpretation? Never Mind.

  • That Potential Revolutionary Scientific Reinterpretation I posted about four days ago does not seem to have played out (but that’s how science works);
  • A nice summary of the top five astronomical discoveries of all time (so far);
  • And a dicier list of “17 astounding mysteries that researchers can’t yet solve”;
  • All these pieces are about the balance between the media and actual science; true scientific advances are very rare.

First of all, I’ve seen no positive follow-up to the news of a week or so ago about the revolutionary new interpretation of data that eliminates the notion of “dark matter” and implies that the universe is twice as old as long-thought. In searching for the researcher’s name (Rajendra Gupta), and most authoritative source I found was this. And it’s from last August!? Why did this story bubble up into my Google News feed — via many sources — last week? Don’t know. But it always pays to be skeptical, and follow-up, and check the sources.

Astronomy.com, Paul Sutter, 7 Aug 2023: Is the universe twice as old as we thought?, subtitled “A recent paper suggests our understanding of the cosmos is wrong and proposes a different model. Could this new idea be right? In a word: No.”

Continue reading

Posted in Astronomy, Science | Comments Off on That Potential Revolutionary Scientific Reinterpretation? Never Mind.

EO Wilson, CONSILIENCE, 11

Earlier posts: Post 1; Post 2; Post 3; Post 4; Post 5; Post 6; Post 7; Post 8; Post 9; Post 10.

Chapter 12, To What End?

Wilson’s final chapter ponders options for humanity’s future, and comes down on the side of “existential conservatism.” And since it is about humanity’s future, the chapter has some things to say about the themes of science fiction.

Key points in this chapter:

  • The big questions are: what we are, where do we come from, and how shall we decide where we go. Neither theology nor western philosophy has done well answering them.
  • There are two risks in gaining this understanding. One: knowledge leads to increase in numbers, the diminishment of the natural world, and technology become a prosthesis. Two: it brings the prospect of altering the biological nature of the human species.
  • Natural selection isn’t really still at work among humans. What is happening is a global homogenization.
  • We face an age of ‘volitional’ evolution, in which with gene therapy we can both cure diseases and engineer improvements. What ‘improvements’ will people choose?
  • The answer will reflect our environment ethic: do we think we are adapted to one specific environment? Or that we are outside the natural world and are able to overcome any limits?
  • Wilson summarizes the current state of the environment [remember this is 1998]: global population rising, eating up the planet’s resources, nearing the limits of food and water supplies, changing the environment. Exceeding the carrying capacity of the planet.
  • It’s too late to return to Paleolithic serenity; the goal must be sustainability. Economists, who preach endless growth and pretend the environment doesn’t exist, are part of the problem.
  • Wilson pleads for preserving “Creation,” i.e. the environment, the biodiversity. Humanity is driving other species to extinction.
  • “The legacy of the Enlightenment is the belief that entirely on our own we can know, and in knowing, understand, and in understanding, choose wisely.”
  • What does it all mean? Considering our deepest roots, Wilson comes down on the side of existential conservatism. “This is what it all means. To the extent that we depend on prosthetic devices to keep ourselves and the biosphere alive, we will render everything fragile. To the extent that we banish the rest of life, we will impoverish our own species for all time. And if we should surrender our genetic nature to machine-aided ratiocination, and our ethics and art and our very meaning to a habit of careless discursion in the name of progress, imagining ourselves godlike and absolved from our ancient heritage, we will become nothing.”

Comments:

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Human Progress, Morality, Psychology, Science, science fiction | Comments Off on EO Wilson, CONSILIENCE, 11

The Economy, the Deep State, and Conservative Denial of Reality

  • How conservatives have won their war against social media in order to keep spreading disinformation;
  • A reality check on what the “Deep State” actually consists of;
  • Two more takes on why so many people don’t realize how good the American economy is;
  • Notes from the fringe: Republican politicians taking credit for infrastructure bills they voted against; how MAGA fans fail the most basic civics; Fox & Friends praying on TV and promoting a prayer app; and the “evangelicalese” used by Project 2025.

*

To the reality-based observer, the “conservative views” that conservatives claim are being suppressed are disinformation, i.e. lies.

Front page of NYT two days ago.

NY Times, 17 Mar 2024: How Trump’s Allies Are Winning the War Over Disinformation, subtitled “Their claims of censorship have successfully stymied the effort to filter election lies online.”

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Economics, Politics | Comments Off on The Economy, the Deep State, and Conservative Denial of Reality

Ancient and Modern Morality, Examples

  • David French and Stephen Breyer on originalism;
  • Short items about how Trump is out of his mind (from Robert Reich), his “blood bath” comments, and his threat to shut down the media;
  • Jamelle Bouie on how the election isn’t about Biden and Trump, so much as two differing visions of American government — whether it exists to help people, or to rule over others;
  • An article about GOP hypocrisy, on moral matters, specifically about LGBTQ+ people threaten “vicarious immortality,” as I’ve been saying for years.

Here’s a brief opinion piece (on the paper’s website’s “The Point” blog) that relates to yesterday’s post about the Supreme Court’s motivated reasoning.

NY Times, David French, 18 Mar 2024: Justice Breyer Is Only Partly Right About Originalism

Continue reading

Posted in Morality, Politics, Religion | Comments Off on Ancient and Modern Morality, Examples

EO Wilson, CONSILIENCE, 10

Chapter 11, Ethics and Religion

The chapter in the book that would most challenge conservatives, or anyone who thinks morality and religion are handed down from on high.

Key points in this chapter:

On ethics:

  • Author summarizes arguments on both sides, the transcendental and the empirical, for the origin of ethical sentiments.
  • Theologians see natural law as an expression of God’s will, despite allowing the faithful to justify war, slavery, and genocide.
  • Wilson is an empiricist, of course. “The primary origin of the moral instincts is the dynamic relation between cooperation and defection.” That is, our moral instincts arose as rules to solve ethical dilemmas in the primitive environment, e.g. regarding money, status, power. Thus we evolved cooperation, remorse, shame. The dark side of these sentiments is xenophobia.
  • “Ethical and religious beliefs are created from the bottom up, from people to their culture. They do not come from the top down, from God or other non-material source to the people by way of culture.”
  • And yet moral sentiments can change — as a result of new knowledge and experience; certain rules may be relaxed, others devised. That’s why we find things like slavery unpalatable today.
  • Ultimately ancient sentiments will adapt for the conditions of modern life. Wilson sees the result as likely democratic, to the detriment of rival ideologies and religions, though it will be slow.

On religion:

  • Religions are born, grow, compete, reproduce, and eventually die. They begin as cults. They involve a creation myth and a mystery only devotees have access to.
  • The religious drive arises from the survival instinct, i.e. fear of death. It provides an understanding and control of life, explained via mythic narratives, and the supernatural as evidence of another world so desperately desired.
  • Humans are easily seduced by confident, charismatic leaders, especially in religious organizations.
  • People are attracted by transcendentalism since empiricism seems sterile and inadequate. But passion and desire are not the same as truth.
  • Theology is a history of abstractions: the Hebrews resolved the pantheon into a single person; later philosophers have moved away from God as a literal person.
  • “The essence of humanity’s spiritual dilemma is that we evolved genetically to accept one truth and discovered another.”
  • We’re learning too much about how the world works for this contradiction to remain.
  • Yes, people need sacred narratives. And so religion must incorporate the discoveries of science in order to remain credible. The result will be the secularization of the human epic, and of religion itself.

\\

Comments:

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Human Progress, Morality, Science | Comments Off on EO Wilson, CONSILIENCE, 10