Longtermism

A key aspect of (good) science fiction is that it takes a long term view, of the species, of the universe, as so few individual people do.

Continue reading

Posted in Human Progress, science fiction | Comments Off on Longtermism

Paperback Sets: Asimov’s Foundation Novels

I’m going to begin a series of posts capturing photos of some of the many sets of matching paperbacks that appeared in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when I began buying books, that I have acquired (some when published and some over time).

Continue reading

Posted in Paperback Sets, science fiction | Comments Off on Paperback Sets: Asimov’s Foundation Novels

Walter Jon Williams: “Surfacing” + 2

This week’s story being consider by the Facebook Best Science Fiction and Fantasy Short Fiction group, for its reading of the big Gardner Dozois book shown here, is the second story in that book, a 1988 novella by Walter Jon Williams called “Surfacing.” It’s about 60 pages in a typical book, fewer pages in this anthology with its tiny print. In this post I’m also reviewing two other notable stories by Williams, from 1999 and 2003.

Continue reading

Posted in science fiction, Short Fiction | Comments Off on Walter Jon Williams: “Surfacing” + 2

Facebook Memes: Conspiracy Theories; Ignorant People

Quick post for this afternoon; I’m working a long post about the next story my Facebook reading group will address on Sunday, concerning a novella by Walter Jon Williams, and I’m taking the opportunity while revisiting these older stories by also rereading additional stories by the same authors. So tomorrow I’ll have a post about three stories by Walter Jon Williams.

For today, two Facebook memes. I’ve seen both before; they’re still apt. The first is about conspiracy theories.

Continue reading

Posted in Culture | Comments Off on Facebook Memes: Conspiracy Theories; Ignorant People

David McRaney, HOW MINDS CHANGE

How Minds Change: The Surprising Science of Belief, Opinion, and Persuasion (Portfolio/Penguin, June 2022, 330pp)

Almost a decade ago I discovered two books by David McRaney, YOU ARE NOT SO SMART (2011) and YOU ARE NOW LESS DUMB (2013) that were popularizations of the discoveries of psychology over the previous decade or two. All about cognitive biases, how people commit logical fallacies, how they use heuristics. From his books, and others of the past two decades by Dan Ariely, Tom Gilovich, Daniel Kahneman, Jonathan Haidt, and others, I’ve learned a great about the difference between what people believe is true and what actually is true – a theme that dovetails with the notions of science fiction that suggest humans do not or cannot perceive more than our immediate experience, that a larger reality is out there for us to discover, if we can just think our way to it.

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Psychology | Comments Off on David McRaney, HOW MINDS CHANGE

Abortion Votes and Republicans on Parenting

When I opened Facebook this morning the first 10 items were all about the election results in Kansas (from news sources or friends citing them), in which an attempt to remove protections for abortion *failed* rather dramatically — by 60% over 37% or thereabouts. And here I just quoted this para from that Slate article about the New York Times, yesterday:

But most Americans—57 percent, according to Pew Research and 63 percent according to a more recent CNN poll—disapprove of the repeal of Roe. Treating the minority that embraces it with more curiosity and empathy than the majority who opposes it will lead it to skewed perceptions of the reality on the ground.

Thus, all today:
Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Evolution, Politics | Comments Off on Abortion Votes and Republicans on Parenting

Bothsidesism and Media Bias

Here’s an odd headline. What could this be about?

Slate, Savannah Jacobson, 1 Aug 2022: Why the New York Times’ Post-Roe Abortion Coverage Has Felt a Little Off, subtitled, “It’s the same problem that always plagues the Times.”

Continue reading

Posted in Politics, Psychology | Comments Off on Bothsidesism and Media Bias

Randy Olson, HOUSTON, WE HAVE A NARRATIVE

This is an interesting book that I’m disappointed by only because it’s not the book I wanted to read. That is, not the author’s fault. An interesting, useful, book nonetheless.

(University of Chicago Press, 2015, trade paperback, 260pp)

Olson’s book is about narrative, and science — but only science in terms of writing paper abstracts and press releases. About telling the ‘story’ of new scientific results.

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Narrative, Science | Comments Off on Randy Olson, HOUSTON, WE HAVE A NARRATIVE

Recent Doonesbury and Utopian Ideologies

Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy, Politics, science fiction | Comments Off on Recent Doonesbury and Utopian Ideologies

Demographic Studies: Red v Blue, Abortions, Social Services, and Mortality Gaps

Two items today that fit neatly together. They are illustrations of demographic trends that seem always to align. Red states, religion, support for authoritarian politicians, disapproval of abortion, disapproval of certain books, distrust of science, and lack of social services. And higher death rates.

Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Science | Comments Off on Demographic Studies: Red v Blue, Abortions, Social Services, and Mortality Gaps