And only another unknown horseman; there are some things I just will not eat

Posting Thursday evening:

Saturday evening we are going to a performance by the LA Philharmonic of Philip Glass’ 1984 music for ‘the CIVIL warS’. It’s one of my favorite Glass pieces — along with Symphony #5, the early operas Satyagraha and Akhnaten, and the three ‘qatsi film soundtracks — Koyaanisqatsi (1982), Powaqqatsi (1988) and Naqoyqatsi (2002). And the Kundun soundtrack. And the String Quartet #5. And La Belle et la Bete. And maybe a few others — The Hours soundtrack now springs to mind. There are hundreds of compositions and nearly as many recordings of Philip Glass music, and many of them do seem repetitive and too similar to other compositions, but a small dozen or two stand out as brilliant pieces that will withstand the tests of time.

The Civil Wars music by Glass has an interesting history; it was composed for a grand concert to be performed at the 1984 Olympics, in Los Angeles, staged by Robert Wilson, but funding fell through and it was never staged as intended. (A daylong piece by various composers; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Civil_Wars:_A_Tree_Is_Best_Measured_When_It_Is_Down.) The then LA Phil performed it a year or two later, and in my Philip Glass zeal (I had discovered his LP Glassworks 2 years earlier, and had heard “Einstein on the Beach” on KPFK at some point), I tape recorded the concert off the radio, and listened to that recording on a cassette for years and years until the first CD recording came out, on Nonesuch, in 1999.

An anecdote I’ve always remembered is that members of the then LA Philharmonic, especially the string players, in 1984 or so, so objected to the perceived simplistic repetitiveness of Glass’ music, that they, the string players, deliberately turned their pages very noisily during that concert I recorded off the radio.

Times have changed, somewhat. While Glass symphonies or operas are hardly a staple of professional orchestras or opera companies, his music is in fact alive and well, as evidenced by this second or third ‘Minimalist Jukebox’ series of concerts being staged this month by the LA Philharmonic.

(On the other hand, looking at the complete list of Glass compositionns on Wikipedia, it’s still remarkable how many of these pieces, especially the operas, have never been recorded. Two operas based on Doris Lessing novels?? No recordings; I’ve never heard them. The recent opera about Walt Disney? NY Times coverage, but no recording, yet.)

And, listening to this piece again right now — yes, the strings play these repetitive arpeggios. But the vocal lines above them are soaring, lyrical, and gorgeous. This is possibly the most distinctive trait of Glass’ music. It’s a magnificent and moving work of music.

The Civil Wars: A Tree Is Best Measured When It Is Down – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Posted in Music | Comments Off on And only another unknown horseman; there are some things I just will not eat

Interesting Links This Weekend

There’s *another* great science show running [in addition to “Cosmos”], “Your Inner Fish”, based on the book by Neil Shubin, which explores the physiological resemblances among animals, from fishies to humans, that are of course one of the many lines of evidence that support biological evolution. Shubin’s story is especially interesting since he not only *predicted* that a certain type of fossil would be found, and where it would be found, but that fossil, dubbed Tiktaalik by the local Inuits, is one of the key ‘missing links’ of all time — the amphibian with legs that crawled up out of the sea.

Chris Mooney at Slate has a nice write-up about the show, with obligatory notice of reactions of creationists, who simply shrug and dismiss any evidence that doesn’t conform to biblical worldviews.

(Episodes are available online: Your Inner Fish.)

//

There seem to be a handful of articles every week about science and religion and how the right-wing of American culture is trying to undercut scientific understanding that threatens religious worldviews. Am I just more sensitive to these lately, given the development of my thematic interests in the past year, or do these articles signify a true cultural shift that reflects the fracturing of American culture into echo-chamber tribes?

In any case, here is Andrew O’Hehir at Salon on America: Stupidly stuck between religion and science.

This is an overview of many current issues, worth reading; here is a passage the struck me:

William Jennings Bryan, although revered as a forefather by today’s creationists, would have had nothing in common with them politically and very little theologically. (Bryan would have told you that the Bible was “true,” but he didn’t mean that God created the universe in six literal 24-hour days.) Islamic fundamentalism, the particular bugaboo of Dawkins and Harris, is more recent still, a metaphysical uprising against late modernism and the global force of Western consumer culture.

//

Next, this very reasonable article at Salon about how science isn’t a matter of “authority” of one or any number of scientists; it’s about what the evidence actually says. With a particular target about those who misrepresent such evidence.

Fox News hates science: How the media misrepresents “authority”

//

And finally for today, another book excerpt at Salon, Stop twisting the Bible: There is no message against same-sex marriage

Which Salon subtitles: “Moses and Paul are being misinterpreted: They were against gang rape and pederasty, not loving relationships”.

A subject visited by many writers, among them John Corvino. But there are so many who don’t want to hear it. Or, to take an entirely different angle — how generations throughout history pick and choose and interpret those passages of holy books that conform to their ways of life, or conform to their ideas of the ‘others’ they want to condemn. It’s a human tradition.

Posted in Culture, Evolution, Religion, Science, The Gays | Comments Off on Interesting Links This Weekend

Mind/Brain and Mathematical Intelligence

Several interesting links today to articles I’ve not yet had a chance to read, but I’ll defer those to note this review in Entertainment Weekly of a book called Struck by Genius by Jason Padgett (and Maureen Seaberg… probably the actual author); subtitled, “How a Brain Injury Made Me a Mathematical Marvel”.

There are numerous cases in medical history of how brain injuries – via concussions, or objects thrust into the skull – change a person’s personality utterly, sometimes causing them to lose critical skills. This book, about which I’ve only read this review, is about an opposite case: a man who, assaulted in a bar fight and suffering a concussion, became a mathematical prodigy.

This strikes a chord as yet another example of how the mind is inextricably bound with the brain, or more correctly, to acknowledge that they are one and the same. There is no numinous ‘mind’ or ‘soul’ that is distinct from the functioning of the brain, as far as decades of neuroscience have been able to determine. (I have an unread book on my shelf called We Are Our Brains.) If traumatic examples like this one aren’t sufficient evidence of this equivalence, you’d think everyday experiences in which alcohol, caffeine, or other drugs change brain chemistry and thus influence the personality and the way one’s ‘mind’ interacts with the world would be obvious evidence as well.

(The example in this book also implicates the philosophical question of whether mathematics is an inherent truth about the world, or a creation of the human brain. The subject of this book “describes hours spent eagerly conversing with customers about the way he understands pi or how fractals work.” A change in the functioning of his brain changed the way he understood these ideas.)

Despite which, the mind/brain distinction, ever since clarified by Descartes, persists in common culture, and religious doctrine. In science fiction, a common theme for decades (through the 1960s, at least) was about telepathy, premonitions, and other forms of ESP (‘extra-sensory perception’) – a theme I have the impression has much faded since then, except perhaps in media SF, as the evidence for the reality of such phenomena has conspicuously failed to materialize and their existence has become more a matter of wish-fulfillment.

I’ve long had a notion – which I may have picked up from reading somewhere, or which may be an original thought – that a sign of a truly advanced intelligence (e.g. some non-human, independently evolved, intelligence) would be the extent to which mathematical truths were obvious. Humans, even the mathematicians, need to construct proofs of the Pythagorean theorem, for example; would a relatively superior intelligence see this as trivially true, the way we realize that two non-parallel lines in the same plane can intersect at only a single point? Not to mention the vast realms of higher mathematics, number theory, group theory, analytical analysis, and so many other fields for which humans need to carefully construct elaborate, logically rigorous proofs, an ultimate example of which might be the enormously detailed proof by Andrew Wiles of Fermat’s Last Theorem. Would all of that be obvious to a vaster intelligence than ours?

Posted in Culture, MInd, Science, Thinking | Comments Off on Mind/Brain and Mathematical Intelligence

Today’s Favorite Song: Mr. Little Jeans, Good Mistake

Have now heard it often enough on KCRW‘s Morning Becomes Eclectic program that it’s embedded itself in my mind.

Posted in Music | Comments Off on Today’s Favorite Song: Mr. Little Jeans, Good Mistake

Diversity in Science Fiction, Two Examples

I’ve noted here and on Facebook that science fiction generally aligns with progressive values; science fiction is typically about speculating how things might be different, celebrating discoveries of what is new and celebrating conceptual breakthroughs of understanding, rather than reflexively rejecting anything new and different as a threat to traditional, conservative values. But science fiction is not a monolithic subculture any more than any other subculture is. A couple examples turned up today.

Here is an essay in today’s Guardian by regular reviewer Damien Walter, Science fiction needs to reflect that the future is queer, which recalls adventurous 1960’s and ’70’s work by Joanna Russ, Samuel R. Delany, Ursula K. Le Guin, and others about variants in heteronormative human sexuality [which when I read these books, back then, greatly expanded my understanding of the subject], and then cites reactionary responses to a recent essay on the subject:

When author and historian Alex Dally Macfarlane made a call earlier this year for a vision of post-binary gender in SF, her intelligent argument was met with predictably intractable ignorance from conservative sci-fi fans. For writers and fans like Larry Correia, whose virulent attack on MacFarlane was excellently dissected by Jim C Hines, sex is a biological imperative and the idea of gender as a social construct is a damn liberal lie! But Correia boils it down to a much simpler argument. However accurate a queer future might be, SF authors must continue to pander to the bigotry of conservative readers if they want to be “commercial”.

I cite this only as an example of the diversity of thought among science fiction writers and thinkers, and make no attempt to address that particular issue, except to note I am probably (since I haven’t read all the arguments) not on Correia’s side.

Coincidentally on two counts –- since I’ve started rereading some early Arthur C. Clarke, as I mentioned on Facebook, and since it reflects a similar divide in the SF field, though along completely different lines, no wait, three counts, since it’s also in the Guardian –- is a vintage book review column reposted at the Guardian site a couple days ago, a column from 1965, in which J.G. Ballard dismisses a volume of Clarke reprints thusly:

An Arthur C Clarke Omnibus (Sidgwick and Jackson, 30s) contains two novels, “Childhood’s End” and “Prelude to Space,” and a short-story collection, “Expedition to Earth.” Reprinted after a ten-year lapse, they illustrate the failure of traditional science fiction. Wholly concerned with an outer space seen in terms of the crudest extrapolations, these stories are dated not only by their superficial scientific gimmickry, but by the trivial dialogue and characterisation. The difference between the old and new science fiction is the point where invention ends and imagination begins.

The issues here are also vast and I won’t try to address them right now. Suffice to say for the moment there are various standards for what constitutes success or failure in any kind of artistic field, especially literature, especially science fiction.

Posted in Culture, Personal history, science fiction | Comments Off on Diversity in Science Fiction, Two Examples

A belated favorite song – DJ Koze, Homesick

Heard this a lot late last year, on KCRW, and thought about it as the “hee hee” song, for the background accents.

Posted in Music | Comments Off on A belated favorite song – DJ Koze, Homesick

The Need to Feel Special

The scientific kerfuffle of the past couple days has been about a documentary supporting geocentrism (as if the creationists are not crazy enough), the idea that the Earth is the center of the universe, immovable, and that the sun and stars rotate around it. An idea that has been pretty thoroughly been debunked for, like, 500 years now. The documentary includes interview excerpts from prominent scientists, including Lawrence Krauss and Michio Kaku, and has narration by Kate Mulgrew, known to science geeks as the captain in one of the Star Trek series (Star Trek Voyager, a show I never watched).

Lawrence Krauss speculates in Slate how snips of interviews he’s done might have ended up in this documentary, and explains that he categorically disavows his implied support for the film’s premise.

The trailer for the film implies that NASA is engaged in a conspiracy to suppress the evidence the Earth is really the center of everything. You know, there’s a Flat Earth society too. No idea is so outlandish or discredited that someone somewhere doesn’t still believe it. There will always be people immune to reason and evidence who cling to ideas that flatter oneself.

Why would anyone put any stock in geocentrism, despite hundreds of years of scientific evidence otherwise?

It’s all about the need to feel special, it seems; this idea is evoked several times in the film’s trailer. “We are in a special place” created by God, we hear, revealing the obvious religious motivation.

The snips of Krauss and Michio Kaku and others are vague takes on the idea that physics and cosmology are changing, selectively edited without their approval to support the filmmaker’s take. This has happened before. Presumably the filmmakers are not Christians who take seriously the commandment to not bear false witness.

The narrator of this ‘documentary’, Kate Mulgrew, also disavows her apparent support for this, via a Facebook post reproduced by Think Progress, which also notes that “This is not the first time scientists have been taken out of context to advance a far-right political agenda….”

Why do I bother mentioning this, since Phil Plait and Lawrence Krauss suggest simply ignoring it, not giving it any publicity?

Because it fascinates me as yet another example of how humans have this need to feel special, to the point of denying the evidence of the world around them and the conclusions reason would dictate, in preference to fantasies of one sort or another that appeal to human vanity. It is an extension, as I described in a previous post, of the childish need to feel oneself at the center of the world, and never growing up out of this attitude.

Here’s Gawker’s take.

[last full para revised 10apr14 3.30pm]

Posted in Cosmology, Culture, Lunacy, Religion, Science | Comments Off on The Need to Feel Special

Bring Her Back to Me

I thought I had posted about this song before, perhaps on Facebook, but cannot find the link. So let me add it here with a ‘music’ tag for future reference.

Which is to say, my past year’s favorite song: Frank Ocean, Pyramids. An epic, two-part song about black women and history.

Rapgenius has an informative exegesis, in the right sidebar.

[Corrected YouTube link 11apr14; this is the full song, though without a video.]

Posted in Music | Comments Off on Bring Her Back to Me

The Water’s Clear and Innocent

Today’s favorite song: Codex, by Radiohead, from their 2011 album The King of Limbs.

It’s a beautiful, desolate song, possibly about the temptation of suicide, probably about something more subtle.

Ever since I first heard it, I think of Convict Lake, along the east side of the Sierra, a place we stopped at once on one of the annual trips to Mammoth Mountain I took in the 1990s, when I hung out with a ski group. (I was never much of a skier, but I liked the trips.) The lake is beautiful, still, cold, utterly deserted. It’s infamous as the site of a 1990 incident in which a couple camp counselors and several teenagers fell through thin winter ice and were drowned.

More images at Google.

Posted in Music, Personal history | Comments Off on The Water’s Clear and Innocent

This Week’s Favorite New Song – Lykke Li

(Aside from all the tracks on the new Beck album)

Posted in Music | Comments Off on This Week’s Favorite New Song – Lykke Li