Things That Are Not True, and Immorality

Catching up on interesting items from the past few days, about the Christian right’s embrace of a “lying libertine,” how faith healers who kill their children get away with it in some states, how Republicans who lose elections react to the point to shooting up Democrats, the need to find a villain behind COVID, and the mature idea of being able to change one’s mind based on changing evidence. All, today, filtered through Michael Shermer’s notion that false beliefs about the world lead to immorality.

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Morality, Science | Comments Off on Things That Are Not True, and Immorality

Michael Shermer: THE MORAL ARC

Subtitled: How Science and Reason Lead Humanity toward Truth, Justice, and Freedom

(Henry Holt, January 2015, 541pp, including 55pp of notes, 30pp of bibliography, and 15pp of acknowledgments and index)

This is Michael Shermer’s magnus opus, perhaps, culminating a running theme in his earlier books from WHY PEOPLE BELIEVE WEIRD THINGS in 1997 (reviewed here), HOW WE BELIEVE in 2000 (here), THE SCIENCE OF GOOD & EVIL (which I haven’t read yet), and THE BELIEVING BRAIN in 2011 (ditto). Not to mention WHY DARWIN MATTERS in 2006 (here) and other books about the territory between science and irrationality. Shermer was founder and editor of Skeptic magazine, and his perspective is interesting because for a while in high school he was a born-again-Christian until, as he put it in the Darwin book, “The scales fell from my eyes! It turned out that the creationist literature I was reading presented a Darwinian cardboard cutout that a child could knock down.” Also, he was a cross-country bicyclist for a while.

The book is spiritual kin to Steven Pinker’s THE BETTER ANGELS OF OUR NATURE (partial summary) and I even sat down to read this Shermer book soon after it came out, until seeing in the opening pages Shermer himself crediting Pinker’s book. Eventually I did read Pinker’s book, and its sequel, and so eventually just last month, despite not having read a couple of Shermer’s earlier books in that thread above, plowed through this one, his longest.

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Morality, Science | Comments Off on Michael Shermer: THE MORAL ARC

Robert Lanza and Nancy Kress, OBSERVER

(The Story Plant, January 2023, 380pp)

This is a hard science fiction thriller that impressed me in many ways, though I’m not a regular reader of thrillers per se and perhaps am not in a position to judge the book as a thriller. (Just as SF novels written by literary writers often fail in ways literary readers don’t realize, not knowing the standards of SF.) But it does have many of the elements that have made Kress a preeminent hard SF writer for decades now, a point I made when I reviewed her 1991 novella “Beggars in Spain,” here. She does hard science, and she does characters and plot very well too.

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, science fiction | Comments Off on Robert Lanza and Nancy Kress, OBSERVER

A Fundamental Theological Question, via Jerry Coyne

Only time for a quick post today, again, ironically about a fundamental theological issue. What is the essential difference between science and religion, between a way of thinking and a way of not thinking but merely conforming to community traditions, or “believing’ whatever makes you feel good? (In a deep sense this difference, or conflict, comes from not asking the right questions. But that’s a subject for another time.)

Continue reading

Posted in Religion, Science | Comments Off on A Fundamental Theological Question, via Jerry Coyne

Optimism about Science and Tech, Alternative Math, and Political Topics

Another optimistic take on part of current affairs (not politics). Plus: alternative math, and political items.

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Lunacy, Mathematics, Science, Technology | Comments Off on Optimism about Science and Tech, Alternative Math, and Political Topics

Crosby, Stills, and Nash: Daylight Again

So David Crosby died today. I only acquired a couple three of this group’s albums over the years, and from them, this is my favorite song.

Update 23 Jan 23: This post here and on Fb may strike some as inappropriate, because though David Crosby sang these songs, he did not write them, and I didn’t realize that. Numerous sites in recent days that have compiled the best David Crosby songs, which of course don’t include these. This Wikipedia page for the album reveals that this song was written by Stephen Stills.

Continue reading

Posted in Music, Personal history | Comments Off on Crosby, Stills, and Nash: Daylight Again

Atmospheric Rivers and A Coding Conundrum


As has been widely reported on the news, even nationally, California has experienced a nearly unprecedented series of storms moving in from the Pacific in what are called “atmospheric rivers,” some ten storms since late December, with only partial day breaks in between. Continue reading

Posted in Personal history | Comments Off on Atmospheric Rivers and A Coding Conundrum

Alcohol and Civilization, and other recent items

How civilization might have been driven by the desire for alcohol; about the NYT interviewing Republicans; the perspective on conspiratorial thinking from an American living in Britain; paranoia and the GOP; DeSantis’ war on “wokeness”; Paul Waldman on 6 things people believe about politics that are wrong.

And pasta.

Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Human Progress, Psychology | Comments Off on Alcohol and Civilization, and other recent items

Optimism About America, and other recent items

David Brooks on how America is on the right track; Ezra Klein on the fractured Republican Party; and items about gas stoves, red states and their blue cities, the partisan divide in COVID deaths, and how politics doesn’t do nuance.

Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Politics | Comments Off on Optimism About America, and other recent items

The Erratic March of Scientific Progress

Vox, Kelsey Piper, 11 Jan 2023: Why is science slowing down?, subtitled “Science is the engine of society, and the decline of truly disruptive research is a warning sign for all of us.”

Is this really a new problem? Or one of those issues that keeps welling up in popular media because the answer is not well-understood?

Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Science | Comments Off on The Erratic March of Scientific Progress