Five items about Robert M. Sapolsky and his new book, Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will. Which I haven’t read yet.
——

Robert M. Sapolsky, who published a big meaty book six years ago called Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst, has a new book just out this week, Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will, about the contentious issue of whether humans (or any other animals) have “free will.” The recent consensus is that we don’t, not in the way we think we do, but it may be OK to *think* that we do, given the consequences — even if we don’t, in the literal sense that we think we do.
This is one of those ideas that fascinates me because it pits human intuitions against the apparent objective reality of the world. Do humans believe in free will because it’s evolutionarily advantageous for us to do so? (Otherwise we would descend into despair, etc.) And how if accepting do we feel we have any agency in our own lives? To what extent does society expect people to be responsible for their actions? This is what I’m looking forward to Sapolsky exploring.
Continue reading →